The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate isn’t going to the statute unveiling after all. Very suspicious.

Yep. PH put his foot down - no Royal Rota and no Kate.

Source? I don’t think you have one. If you noticed, it was a very small ceremony attended by People who actually knew Diana (aka her sons, relatives and close friends)

+100

US weekly is saying that the royal family as a whole decided it would be better for it to just be about the sons. I personally think William didn’t want her there because he would not be shy about letting people know if it was just Harry’s idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The male pattern baldness gene is strong with these brothers. Yikes. Not even 40 and both sporting chrome domes.

They both were balding in their 20s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate isn’t going to the statute unveiling after all. Very suspicious.

Yep. PH put his foot down - no Royal Rota and no Kate.

Source? I don’t think you have one. If you noticed, it was a very small ceremony attended by People who actually knew Diana (aka her sons, relatives and close friends)

The Royal Rota itself spilled the beans. I hope the Editor for The Mail on Sunday at the Daily Mail is good enough for you.

They’re very salty at being banned from money-making pictures with the People’s Prince.

DP. How does banning Kate = banning the royal rota? Is she moonlighting as a reporter now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe the Cambridges should lay off the Scottish tours and hop over the Atlantic to Canada before it gets worse…

Why? They have no political appointment/influence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe the Cambridges should lay off the Scottish tours and hop over the Atlantic to Canada before it gets worse…

Why bother? As soon as the Queen dies all of these places are clearly bouncing. If they even make it that long.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate isn’t going to the statute unveiling after all. Very suspicious.

Yep. PH put his foot down - no Royal Rota and no Kate.

Harry is a petulant loser.

You think Harry came up with that in his own ? Meg, sweetie. She holds the puppet strings in that marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The male pattern baldness gene is strong with these brothers. Yikes. Not even 40 and both sporting chrome domes.

It’s so, so bad. Yuck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate isn’t going to the statute unveiling after all. Very suspicious.

Yep. PH put his foot down - no Royal Rota and no Kate.

Source? I don’t think you have one. If you noticed, it was a very small ceremony attended by People who actually knew Diana (aka her sons, relatives and close friends)

The Royal Rota itself spilled the beans. I hope the Editor for The Mail on Sunday at the Daily Mail is good enough for you.

They’re very salty at being banned from money-making pictures with the People’s Prince.

DP. How does banning Kate = banning the royal rota? Is she moonlighting as a reporter now?

They’re 2 examples of people who don’t belong there. How is this hard to understand?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate isn’t going to the statute unveiling after all. Very suspicious.

Yep. PH put his foot down - no Royal Rota and no Kate.

Source? I don’t think you have one. If you noticed, it was a very small ceremony attended by People who actually knew Diana (aka her sons, relatives and close friends)

The Royal Rota itself spilled the beans. I hope the Editor for The Mail on Sunday at the Daily Mail is good enough for you.

They’re very salty at being banned from money-making pictures with the People’s Prince.

Where does it say Harry banned Kate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate isn’t going to the statute unveiling after all. Very suspicious.

Yep. PH put his foot down - no Royal Rota and no Kate.

Source? I don’t think you have one. If you noticed, it was a very small ceremony attended by People who actually knew Diana (aka her sons, relatives and close friends)

The Royal Rota itself spilled the beans. I hope the Editor for The Mail on Sunday at the Daily Mail is good enough for you.

They’re very salty at being banned from money-making pictures with the People’s Prince.

DP. How does banning Kate = banning the royal rota? Is she moonlighting as a reporter now?

They’re 2 examples of people who don’t belong there. How is this hard to understand?

You’re just making up stories. Where’s your proof Kate was banned?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The male pattern baldness gene is strong with these brothers. Yikes. Not even 40 and both sporting chrome domes.

It’s so, so bad. Yuck.

Just stop with the body shaming. It's just as unacceptable when it's done to men as when it's done to women. And, there is nothing wrong with baldness.

[Anonymous]

I thought Kate didn’t attend because they were keeping the numbers down due to the pandemic. Aren’t they still quarantining in England?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought Kate didn’t attend because they were keeping the numbers down due to the pandemic. Aren’t they still quarantining in England?

Outdoors? Nope. Giant, packed stadiums with no masks

[Anonymous]

DP: As long as we’re speculating wildly, perhaps Kate didn’t want to be put in the middle, didn’t want her presence to highlight Meghan’s absence — or the absences of Charles and Camilla, and/or wanted to leave it up to the two brothers to sort things out on their own terms. In any event, it was a great decision that was probably made by Kate. The decision to eliminate the noxious press was also, IMO, an excellent one. I also appreciate the effort that William and Harry made to issue a joint statement that they could both support.

[Anonymous]

Kate at Wimbledon.