How can you not understand that literally no one is suggesting her seizures were PTSD episodes? But her seizures are obviously linked to her PTSD, as the character herself said. It was speculated before she revealed her epilepsy diagnosis that her strange behavior may have been related to PTSD, and it was. No one suggested PTSD caused absence seizures, we didn't even know that's what was going on at the time. People thought it might be flashbacks. Turns out it's possible it was both. It is so weird you are still fighting about this. |
It's clearly the character is worried that stress and her PTSD from a more recent event might be triggering the recurrence if her seizures. Especially two in one day which she is obviously freaked out by. PTSD and epilepsy are different diagnoses but PTSD flashbacks could 100% cause an epileptic seizure in someone who already has epilepsy. |
Agree. Disliked that. |
The thread has already moved on and you’re bringing it up again? You need to go back and read the original comment then. Have a good day. |
This is the original idea. This poster thought Hashimi was having a dissociative episode due to PTSD when she was actually having an absence seizure due to epilepsy. This poster also thought she sees a neurologist to mange her PTSD but that is also not correct. She’s sees one to manage her epilepsy. We really don’t know if she’s treating her PTSD. I’m not disagreeing that Hashimi doesn’t have PTSD or that it can contribute to her seizures but this poster didn’t know about the epilepsy or the absence seizure. |
Their ideas were good and based on the available knowledge at the time. NOW we know: Al-Hashimi contracted viral meningitis at age 5 leaving her with absence seizures, but she had been seizure free for a year UNTIL Baby Jane Doe triggered her PTSD which triggered an absence seizure Can we stop arguing about who pinpointed exactly what at what moment WE ARE ON THE VERGE OF DETENTE WITH SANTOS AND LANGDON FANS Let’s not throw that away |
+100000000000 |
| I’ll go first. I have loathed the Langdon character and really invested in Santos. I’m willing to look at how they are alike and the possibility that he’s not simply a manipulative addict and that he and Santos have some things in common. |
Agreed. Langdon is every “good” white boy who overindulged. He should have been reported and his sobriety is far too new to be challenged in the environment he was using in. The light slap and expectation of his peers not needing time to process his return are challenging. I don’t trust him yet. Santos could improve her people skills to put it briefly. Both are brilliant and could be excellent. Both need to work on personal issues before going deeper into their careers. |
I’m the PP and I believe it or not I do agree with this as well! |
lol. Love this! |
Ha ha, yes. I love both Santos AND Langdon ... it is possible! |
For the first time, I am giving Langdon the benefit of the doubt and empathizing with what it would be like to return to your high pressure work environment with everyone knowing that you had an addiction issue (even though they don't know the worst of it). One of the scenes in the finale that bothered me most was giving his urine sample. I thought he was so rude to the nurse who had to observe him and that fit with my general assessment of Langdon being an arrogant jerk. Looking with empathy I am imagining his humiliation and stress level and snapping in the moment. Are they any reforming Santos haters? Maybe you're not falling in love but can you see her differently than you did before? |
Yes. The karaoke scene helped. Also, she didn’t snap at Langdon when he was near her. He laughed at one of her jokes. I see progress. I’ve been saying all along I want them to form a friendship. |
|
Ok I’m just going to go out on a limb here…
Kumbaya my love…kumbaya! |