ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So many trolls on here.

It's now well established that the poor woman was trying to flee and hurt no one.

The fact that she hurt no one is irrelevant. When a car is coming at you there is a threat of bodily harm. That’s all that’s necessary to retaliate.

Jumping out of the way is WAY quicker than raising a handgun.

Why was he so very ready to use it? When the car was only partially blocking the road.

The narrative they're trying to spin is absurd. He "jumped out of the way to avoid imminent death"...but somehow unholstered his gun and shot her in the face at point blank. It's just such stupid spin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work on K Street in DC near the White House and wanted takeout the other day instead of the lunch I brought. Guess what, I decided it wasn’t worth it to walk out since there is a chance, albeit small, I could come upon ICE or national guard, etc. and be shot. So I don’t leave the building from the moment I pull into the garage to the end of the day. And I’m white. In the United States. This could happen to any of us. Be safe out there.

DP.

This post demonstrates that humans are terrible at assessing risk.

You are more likely to be struck by lightning or hit by a bus than shot by ICE or National Guard.

DP you post shows what that you live in a fantasy world. Just stop trying to do math and science. You republicans are incapable of that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So many trolls on here.

It's now well established that the poor woman was trying to flee and hurt no one.

The fact that she hurt no one is irrelevant. When a car is coming at you there is a threat of bodily harm. That’s all that’s necessary to retaliate.

Video clearly shows that the agent was not in the path of the vehicle when he fired. Why is ICE hiring such chicken$hits?

Because POTUS Miller wants big numbers. That's it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So many trolls on here.

It's now well established that the poor woman was trying to flee and hurt no one.

The fact that she hurt no one is irrelevant. When a car is coming at you there is a threat of bodily harm. That’s all that’s necessary to retaliate.

Jumping out of the way is WAY quicker than raising a handgun.

Why was he so very ready to use it? When the car was only partially blocking the road.

The narrative they're trying to spin is absurd. He "jumped out of the way to avoid imminent death"...but somehow unholstered his gun and shot her in the face at point blank. It's just such stupid spin.

The guy walked in front of the car with his weapon drawn, stopped, step closer, carefully aimed for her head and murdered her. Anyone who defends this is an amoral a$$hole who will rot in hell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fleeing is illegal, and it is more illegal if you have to drive into an ICE agent to do it, which she did. And if he had been a mind reader, he would have known she was fleeing, but instead, all the information he had was that a criminal suspect was driving her car into him at the moment.

Police are told not to shoot at fleeing vehicles/people.

+1 Tennessee v Garner is 40 years old, people.

This is another precedence the federal society and the Supreme Court are working to overturn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work on K Street in DC near the White House and wanted takeout the other day instead of the lunch I brought. Guess what, I decided it wasn’t worth it to walk out since there is a chance, albeit small, I could come upon ICE or national guard, etc. and be shot. So I don’t leave the building from the moment I pull into the garage to the end of the day. And I’m white. In the United States. This could happen to any of us. Be safe out there.

DP.

This post demonstrates that humans are terrible at assessing risk.

You are more likely to be struck by lightning or hit by a bus than shot by ICE or National Guard.

DP you post shows what that you live in a fantasy world. Just stop trying to do math and science. You republicans are incapable of that.

Ha. Not a Republican. Just have low tolerance for hysteria.

Suggest you do the math: compare DC deaths from lightning strikes to DC deaths from ICE shootings.

Guess which one’s higher?

[Anonymous]

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.


George Orwell, 1984

[Anonymous]

Anyone going about their business(going to the store, getting gas, driving to pick up your kids, driving car pool to soccer, going to work, etc) are at risk of being murdered by Trump and the Republicans.

We now have American ISIS murdering people on the street. This is domestic terrorism.

The democrats leadership better step up and call it terrorism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work on K Street in DC near the White House and wanted takeout the other day instead of the lunch I brought. Guess what, I decided it wasn’t worth it to walk out since there is a chance, albeit small, I could come upon ICE or national guard, etc. and be shot. So I don’t leave the building from the moment I pull into the garage to the end of the day. And I’m white. In the United States. This could happen to any of us. Be safe out there.

DP.

This post demonstrates that humans are terrible at assessing risk.

You are more likely to be struck by lightning or hit by a bus than shot by ICE or National Guard.

DP you post shows what that you live in a fantasy world. Just stop trying to do math and science. You republicans are incapable of that.

Ha. Not a Republican. Just have low tolerance for hysteria.

Suggest you do the math: compare DC deaths from lightning strikes to DC deaths from ICE shootings.

Guess which one’s higher?

Okay ISIS. We know what side you are on.

[Anonymous]

Good god a woman is murdered in broad daylight.

What will you ugly goons not defend? What does it have to come to?

[Anonymous]

Harrowing footage from the scene showed the unidentified woman in tears over the shooting death of 37-year-old poet Renee Nicole Good, as she admitted encouraging her spouse to confront agents.

'I made her come down here, it’s my fault,' she could be heard saying at one point, through tears. 'They just shot my wife.'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.


George Orwell, 1984

Agree that there is a lot of effort on this thread of that. Encouragingly though, it doesn’t seem Americans are buying. Thousands are protesting and those numbers will grow as more people see the video. It is shocking and careless behavior.

The people hysterically arguing that the shooter was hit by her car probably won’t change their minds. But they are a smaller and smaller part of the population every day. Unless you’re a billionaire, the Trump administration has not done a thing for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work on K Street in DC near the White House and wanted takeout the other day instead of the lunch I brought. Guess what, I decided it wasn’t worth it to walk out since there is a chance, albeit small, I could come upon ICE or national guard, etc. and be shot. So I don’t leave the building from the moment I pull into the garage to the end of the day. And I’m white. In the United States. This could happen to any of us. Be safe out there.

DP.

This post demonstrates that humans are terrible at assessing risk.

You are more likely to be struck by lightning or hit by a bus than shot by ICE or National Guard.

DP you post shows what that you live in a fantasy world. Just stop trying to do math and science. You republicans are incapable of that.

Ha. Not a Republican. Just have low tolerance for hysteria.

Suggest you do the math: compare DC deaths from lightning strikes to DC deaths from ICE shootings.

Guess which one’s higher?

Okay ISIS. We know what side you are on.

Snort. I’m on the side of facts. You?

[Anonymous]

The disturbing way MAGA is trying to psint this ICE thugs as a police officer is telling

No,
One is regulated. Imperfectly maybe but there are laws.

ICE can be manipulated by whoever is in power. How did we not see it coming?

ICE is a terrorist group released to the cities to do Trump/Miller's bidding

Dems better do what they can to shut down the funding

[Anonymous]

The image the MAGAs in this thread are citing as "proof" that the agent was IN FRONT of the vehicle was a manipulated image.