Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DP. Luring someone else’s dog to you with a treat is bizarre at best and threatening at worst. What was he going to do, force her to leash the dog?
Yes. That’s exactly the point.
No, he was trying to scare her, to punish her for ignoring the leash laws. (While video recording her.)
It worked, too.
The implication was that the treat was poisoned. Anyone with a dog knows that there are sickos that do this (and it’s why I trained my dog to never take a treat unless commanded and why I keep my dog on leash).
Please explain the "implication...that the treat was poisoned". I've read this a lot in these comments, with absolutely nothing to support it. Are poisoned dog treats some kind of thing?
+1. Why would anybody’s 1st or even 9th thought be, here’s someone who must have poison dog treats in his pocket? How weird that pp’s mind goes there.
I just can't with stupid people. He, by his own effing admission said he told her "fine, I'm going to handle it my way and you're not going to like it". That is an ominous statement. Are you stupid or just blinded by wanting to be right? Yes, she's a racist pig, but holy crap, admit he implied he was going to do something nefarious. Without that, I can't even listen to your other arguments because you've proven you're jaded and will spout out only what suits your agenda. You want people to see your point, then show you're able to see other points of view too!
And i can't stand people who are trying fabricate threats just to blame the victim. Look at the start of the video, he was over 20 feet away from the woman and the dog. She takes seven strides that are about 2-3 feet long before he warns her to stay back, and she is still more than arms length and more than the social distancing limit of 6 feet away when he asks her not to come closer. So, how much of a threat is a man who is over 20 feet away to her dog. If he's making a threat, why would she not just hold her dog by the collar, put the leash in her hand on or walk away. Instead, if she perceived this to be a threat, why would she actually walk more than 15 feet TOWARDS him and get almost within arms reach from him? She clearly did not perceive him to be threat to her dog or she would not have walked that distance to him. I don't understand how you can make this about a threat unless you are taking his statement completely out of context. The context is that he asked her to leash, she refused. He offered her alternatives that included going to a nearby area of the park without leash laws. She refused. He said if she was going to whatever she wanted he could do the same, even if she didn't like it. He called the dog from 20 feet away. She blew him off again saying the dog wouldn't come. If she felt threatened in any way, she would not have responded belligerently; she would have taken the dog and left. He said, "don't be so sure" and reached into his pocket. She's over 20 feet away. Even if you believe the ludicrous fiction that there are people out there carrying poison in their pockets, HE'S OVER 20 FEET AWAY. She can hold the dog, leash the dog or walk away. He's near 60 and graying. She's nearly 20 years younger. Does she really think she can't get away from him? It's ridiculous the lengths some of you will go to contort and spin the facts to blame the victim. If she felt threatened by him, why would she then stand 10 feet away from him to call the police. Who doesn't retreat from a threatening situation. Who stands there and calls the police? Who then doesn't wait for the police to show? She did not feel threatened. The only people who think she was threatened are entitled dog owners who believe that they have more right to the world than anyone else and that laws and rules like leash laws are for other people, not them.