Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Vindman hasn't done much research on current events and Biden, it appears.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Vindman hasn't done much research on current events and Biden, it appears.

Hasn't done much research on 4chan conspiracy theories now peddled by Nunes and our president, you mean?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Vindman hasn't done much research on current events and Biden, it appears.

There is no "Biden-Burisma" - seriously, there just isn't a there, there. It is manufactured BS that was concocted as a distraction.

[Anonymous]

I am not going to tell you who the WB is! Give it up Nunes.

[Anonymous]

Nunes is crazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nunes is crazy.

There's a method to his madness.

But he's an idiot, yes.

[Anonymous]

It's Castor time! Love this guy for entertainment value.

[Anonymous]

Also, hottie alert in the background. (off topic?)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's Castor time! Love this guy for entertainment value.

He put on a jacket today.

[Anonymous]

"Actually, it's Lt Col. Thank you Ranking Member Nunes"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also, hottie alert in the background. (off topic?)

The dude behind caster.. to the left?

[Anonymous]

Steve Castor is wholly ineffective, and it's frustrating to watch because he focuses too much on small details. It seems like the GOP has really no where to go on their defense but to focus on stupid extraneous details or simply keep saying "Biden" and "Burmisa" in their questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Actually, it's Lt Col. Thank you Ranking Member Nunes"

Good moment. Nunes, you're an a$$hole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Steve Castor is wholly ineffective, and it's frustrating to watch because he focuses too much on small details. It seems like the GOP has really no where to go on their defense but to focus on stupid extraneous details or simply keep saying "Biden" and "Burmisa" in their questions.

Bingo.

There's no real dispute about all of the events or descriptions of phone calls. The only Republican defense is that "it's fine when Trump does it". Which is nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Steve Castor is wholly ineffective, and it's frustrating to watch because he focuses too much on small details. It seems like the GOP has really no where to go on their defense but to focus on stupid extraneous details or simply keep saying "Biden" and "Burmisa" in their questions.

He's ineffective because there is no defense. The facts are not on the GOP's side. Castor can only do so much.