Trump replaced Maguire with Grenell after raging over House briefing on 2020 election threats

[Anonymous]

Grennell won't even last a Scaramucci.

[Anonymous]

The ODNI's annual "Worldwide Threat Assessment" has reportedly not been briefed to Congress because Trump may not like it. This annual report is essential to informing lawmakers about global trends and their impact on our country.
https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2020/02/07/intel-threats-meeting-trump-112236?__twitter_impression=true

[Anonymous]

Even sniveling wieners like Collins know they’ll just be fired on Twitter in a month with nothing to show for it.
They are scraping the bottom of the barrel, and pretty soon there won’t be any takers.
Every thing Trump touches dies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even sniveling wieners like Collins know they’ll just be fired on Twitter in a month with nothing to show for it.
They are scraping the bottom of the barrel, and pretty soon there won’t be any takers.
Every thing Trump touches dies.

John Bolton is about to become a millionaire through his book sales. This is the backup plan of everyone in the administration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It looks like Richard Grenell may have violated FARA while trying to whitewash one of the most corrupt figures the post-Soviet space has ever produced.

Another criminal in Trump's orbit.

So how can he get a security clearance to be in charge of all our national intelligence?
Is Richard Burr fidget spinning while the Republic burns?

[Anonymous]

The only explanation for Trump firing Maguire is that he was afraid Maguire wouldn't stop trying to defend our country from Russian interference. Just like how he had to fire Comey because he wouldn't stop the 2016 Russia investigation.

From Admirial McRaven:

I have known Joe for more than 40 years. There is no better officer, no better man and no greater patriot. He served for 36 years as a Navy SEAL. In 2004, he was promoted to the rank of rear admiral and was chosen to command all of Naval Special Warfare, including the SEALs. Those were dark days for the SEALs. Our combat losses from wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were the highest in our history, and Joe and his wife, Kathy, attended every SEAL funeral, providing comfort and solace to the families of the fallen.

But it didn’t stop there. Not a day went by that the Maguires didn’t reach out to some Gold Star family, some wounded SEAL, some struggling warrior. Every loss was personal, every family precious. When Joe retired in 2010, he tried the corporate world. But his passion for the Special Operations soldiers was so deep that he left a lucrative job and took the position as the president of the Special Operations Warrior Foundation, a charity that pays for educating the children of fallen warriors.

In 2018, Joe was asked to be the director of the National Counterterrorism Center, a job he knew well from his last assignment as a vice admiral. He accepted, but within months of his arrival came the announcement of Coats’s departure as director of national intelligence. Maguire didn’t seek to fill the job; he was asked to do it by the president. At first he declined, suggesting that Sue Gordon, Coats’s deputy, would be better suited for the job.

But the president chose Maguire. And, like most of these good men and women, he came in with the intent to do his very best, to follow the rules, to follow the law and to follow what was morally right. Within a few weeks of taking the assignment, he found himself embroiled in the Ukraine whistleblower case. Joe told the White House that, if asked, he would testify, and he would tell the truth. He did. In short order, he earned the respect of the entire intelligence community. They knew a good man was at the helm. A man they could count on, a man who would back them, a man whose integrity was more important than his future employment.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/william-mcraven-if-good-men-like-joe-maguire-cant-speak-the-truth-we-should-be-deeply-afraid/2020/02/21/2068874c-5503-11ea-b119-4faabac6674f_story.html?utm_campaign=wp_main&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter#comments-wrapper

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even sniveling wieners like Collins know they’ll just be fired on Twitter in a month with nothing to show for it.
They are scraping the bottom of the barrel, and pretty soon there won’t be any takers.
Every thing Trump touches dies.

John Bolton is about to become a millionaire through his book sales. This is the backup plan of everyone in the administration.

Except Trump is blocking the book. Bolton should have testified when he could.

[Anonymous]

This doesn't bode well for Grennell

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/21/grenell-trump-critic-116648

[Anonymous]

To no one’s surprise, Devin Nunes was the HPSCI member who ran to the White House to tell Trump what was in Maguire’s briefing.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/02/21/politics/intelligence-briefing-republican-behind-the-scenes/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To no one’s surprise, Devin Nunes was the HPSCI member who ran to the White House to tell Trump what was in Maguire’s briefing.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/02/21/politics/intelligence-briefing-republican-behind-the-scenes/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

No, he didn't.

California Rep. Devin Nunes said he intends to sue the Washington Post over a report that said he informed President Trump about a classified briefing about Russian interference in the 2020 election.

Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, made the announcement during a Friday evening interview on Fox News's The Story with Martha MacCallum, which was guest-hosted by Harris Faulkner.

“I don’t know what planet the Washington Post is on," Nunes said. "But they’ll have an opportunity in federal court in the next couple weeks to explain who their sources are, because I’m going to have to take them to court because I didn't go to the White House. I didn't talk to President Trump, Harris. So, this is the same garbage."

“They build a narrative, they plant a narrative, they write fake news stories about it of things that shouldn’t even be talked about, you know, this classified information," Nunes said. "And then, they run these stories. Who the hell is leaking this?”

The Washington Post did not immediately return a request for comment.

Jack Langer, Nunes' communications director, told the Washington Examiner: “The Washington Post has been a crucial instrument used by resistance leakers for three years to perpetuate the Russia collusion hoax. Now they’ve published more false information about Rep. Nunes, so they’ll get a chance to make their case in federal court. Honestly, sometimes it seems like the Post’s anonymous sources are Republican plants feeding them false information in order to further discredit their reporting.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devin-nunes-vows-to-sue-washington-post-for-garbage-report-on-classified-russia-briefing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To no one’s surprise, Devin Nunes was the HPSCI member who ran to the White House to tell Trump what was in Maguire’s briefing.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/02/21/politics/intelligence-briefing-republican-behind-the-scenes/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

No, he didn't.

California Rep. Devin Nunes said he intends to sue the Washington Post over a report that said he informed President Trump about a classified briefing about Russian interference in the 2020 election.

Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, made the announcement during a Friday evening interview on Fox News's The Story with Martha MacCallum, which was guest-hosted by Harris Faulkner.

“I don’t know what planet the Washington Post is on," Nunes said. "But they’ll have an opportunity in federal court in the next couple weeks to explain who their sources are, because I’m going to have to take them to court because I didn't go to the White House. I didn't talk to President Trump, Harris. So, this is the same garbage."

“They build a narrative, they plant a narrative, they write fake news stories about it of things that shouldn’t even be talked about, you know, this classified information," Nunes said. "And then, they run these stories. Who the hell is leaking this?”

The Washington Post did not immediately return a request for comment.

Jack Langer, Nunes' communications director, told the Washington Examiner: “The Washington Post has been a crucial instrument used by resistance leakers for three years to perpetuate the Russia collusion hoax. Now they’ve published more false information about Rep. Nunes, so they’ll get a chance to make their case in federal court. Honestly, sometimes it seems like the Post’s anonymous sources are Republican plants feeding them false information in order to further discredit their reporting.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devin-nunes-vows-to-sue-washington-post-for-garbage-report-on-classified-russia-briefing

That Nunes sure loves his frivolous law suits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To no one’s surprise, Devin Nunes was the HPSCI member who ran to the White House to tell Trump what was in Maguire’s briefing.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/02/21/politics/intelligence-briefing-republican-behind-the-scenes/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

No, he didn't.

California Rep. Devin Nunes said he intends to sue the Washington Post over a report that said he informed President Trump about a classified briefing about Russian interference in the 2020 election.

Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, made the announcement during a Friday evening interview on Fox News's The Story with Martha MacCallum, which was guest-hosted by Harris Faulkner.

“I don’t know what planet the Washington Post is on," Nunes said. "But they’ll have an opportunity in federal court in the next couple weeks to explain who their sources are, because I’m going to have to take them to court because I didn't go to the White House. I didn't talk to President Trump, Harris. So, this is the same garbage."

“They build a narrative, they plant a narrative, they write fake news stories about it of things that shouldn’t even be talked about, you know, this classified information," Nunes said. "And then, they run these stories. Who the hell is leaking this?”

The Washington Post did not immediately return a request for comment.

Jack Langer, Nunes' communications director, told the Washington Examiner: “The Washington Post has been a crucial instrument used by resistance leakers for three years to perpetuate the Russia collusion hoax. Now they’ve published more false information about Rep. Nunes, so they’ll get a chance to make their case in federal court. Honestly, sometimes it seems like the Post’s anonymous sources are Republican plants feeding them false information in order to further discredit their reporting.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devin-nunes-vows-to-sue-washington-post-for-garbage-report-on-classified-russia-briefing

Hmmmm.... who to believe, an award winning newspaper or a corrupt politician with a record of lying?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To no one’s surprise, Devin Nunes was the HPSCI member who ran to the White House to tell Trump what was in Maguire’s briefing.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/02/21/politics/intelligence-briefing-republican-behind-the-scenes/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

No, he didn't.

California Rep. Devin Nunes said he intends to sue the Washington Post over a report that said he informed President Trump about a classified briefing about Russian interference in the 2020 election.

Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, made the announcement during a Friday evening interview on Fox News's The Story with Martha MacCallum, which was guest-hosted by Harris Faulkner.

“I don’t know what planet the Washington Post is on," Nunes said. "But they’ll have an opportunity in federal court in the next couple weeks to explain who their sources are, because I’m going to have to take them to court because I didn't go to the White House. I didn't talk to President Trump, Harris. So, this is the same garbage."

“They build a narrative, they plant a narrative, they write fake news stories about it of things that shouldn’t even be talked about, you know, this classified information," Nunes said. "And then, they run these stories. Who the hell is leaking this?”

The Washington Post did not immediately return a request for comment.

Jack Langer, Nunes' communications director, told the Washington Examiner: “The Washington Post has been a crucial instrument used by resistance leakers for three years to perpetuate the Russia collusion hoax. Now they’ve published more false information about Rep. Nunes, so they’ll get a chance to make their case in federal court. Honestly, sometimes it seems like the Post’s anonymous sources are Republican plants feeding them false information in order to further discredit their reporting.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devin-nunes-vows-to-sue-washington-post-for-garbage-report-on-classified-russia-briefing

Hmmmm.... who to believe, an award winning newspaper or a corrupt politician with a record of lying?

I believe Nunes over any anonymous source the WaPo credits with their information.
After the last 3 years, Nunes has proven himself to be honest - the WaPo - not so much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To no one’s surprise, Devin Nunes was the HPSCI member who ran to the White House to tell Trump what was in Maguire’s briefing.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/02/21/politics/intelligence-briefing-republican-behind-the-scenes/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

No, he didn't.

California Rep. Devin Nunes said he intends to sue the Washington Post over a report that said he informed President Trump about a classified briefing about Russian interference in the 2020 election.

Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, made the announcement during a Friday evening interview on Fox News's The Story with Martha MacCallum, which was guest-hosted by Harris Faulkner.

“I don’t know what planet the Washington Post is on," Nunes said. "But they’ll have an opportunity in federal court in the next couple weeks to explain who their sources are, because I’m going to have to take them to court because I didn't go to the White House. I didn't talk to President Trump, Harris. So, this is the same garbage."

“They build a narrative, they plant a narrative, they write fake news stories about it of things that shouldn’t even be talked about, you know, this classified information," Nunes said. "And then, they run these stories. Who the hell is leaking this?”

The Washington Post did not immediately return a request for comment.

Jack Langer, Nunes' communications director, told the Washington Examiner: “The Washington Post has been a crucial instrument used by resistance leakers for three years to perpetuate the Russia collusion hoax. Now they’ve published more false information about Rep. Nunes, so they’ll get a chance to make their case in federal court. Honestly, sometimes it seems like the Post’s anonymous sources are Republican plants feeding them false information in order to further discredit their reporting.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devin-nunes-vows-to-sue-washington-post-for-garbage-report-on-classified-russia-briefing

Hmmmm.... who to believe, an award winning newspaper or a corrupt politician with a record of lying?

I believe Nunes over any anonymous source the WaPo credits with their information.
After the last 3 years, Nunes has proven himself to be honest - the WaPo - not so much.

Also Nunes has shown himself to be extremely litigious and dishonest (his family farm).

WaPo can and does retract stories. Because they're a good newspaper.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To no one’s surprise, Devin Nunes was the HPSCI member who ran to the White House to tell Trump what was in Maguire’s briefing.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/02/21/politics/intelligence-briefing-republican-behind-the-scenes/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

No, he didn't.

California Rep. Devin Nunes said he intends to sue the Washington Post over a report that said he informed President Trump about a classified briefing about Russian interference in the 2020 election.

Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, made the announcement during a Friday evening interview on Fox News's The Story with Martha MacCallum, which was guest-hosted by Harris Faulkner.

“I don’t know what planet the Washington Post is on," Nunes said. "But they’ll have an opportunity in federal court in the next couple weeks to explain who their sources are, because I’m going to have to take them to court because I didn't go to the White House. I didn't talk to President Trump, Harris. So, this is the same garbage."

“They build a narrative, they plant a narrative, they write fake news stories about it of things that shouldn’t even be talked about, you know, this classified information," Nunes said. "And then, they run these stories. Who the hell is leaking this?”

The Washington Post did not immediately return a request for comment.

Jack Langer, Nunes' communications director, told the Washington Examiner: “The Washington Post has been a crucial instrument used by resistance leakers for three years to perpetuate the Russia collusion hoax. Now they’ve published more false information about Rep. Nunes, so they’ll get a chance to make their case in federal court. Honestly, sometimes it seems like the Post’s anonymous sources are Republican plants feeding them false information in order to further discredit their reporting.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devin-nunes-vows-to-sue-washington-post-for-garbage-report-on-classified-russia-briefing

Hmmmm.... who to believe, an award winning newspaper or a corrupt politician with a record of lying?

I believe Nunes over any anonymous source the WaPo credits with their information.
After the last 3 years, Nunes has proven himself to be honest - the WaPo - not so much.

Also Nunes has shown himself to be extremely litigious and dishonest (his family farm).

WaPo can and does retract stories. Because they're a good newspaper.

The WaPo was among many MSM that hailed the FISA memo written by Schiff, which proved to be a bunch of BS, and criticized the memo written by Nunes, which was proven accurate.
After that, and their entire coverage of Russia gate, I have little confidence in their reporting, particularly when they use anonymous sourcing.