Kavanaugh Accuser reveals her Identity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he really was sort of a rich jerk drunken teen, how the heck did he get into Yale in the 80s? Correct me if I'm wrong but he's not Bush family rich & connected, is he?

He can be smart and be a complete misogynist a-hole. See Rob Porter.

He went to Georgetown Prep. Not exactly “salt of the earth.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And the next person nominated? Me too. And the next? Me too. And the next? Me too.

See the pattern here?

Keep destroying your credibility liberals.

Merrick Garland.

Point proven.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no statute of limitations in Maryland for sexual assault. The Maryland DA should investigate this charge, now that this woman has come forward publicly. There should be a trial.

Is there a source for this? I tried looking it up, but all I could find is that the victim has twenty years to file a charge for sexual assault after she turns 18.

The victim was a sophomore so she wasn’t 18.

That doesn't matter, according to this:

https://www.marylandaccidentattorneyblog.com/maryland-lengthens-statute-limitations-victims-childhood-sexual-abuse/

If that's the case, well, lucky for Kavanaugh!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Polygraph conducted by the FBI demonstrated she was being truthful.

This is very credible.

Will "Bart O'Kavanaugh" take a polygraph? Hell no!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no statute of limitations in Maryland for sexual assault. The Maryland DA should investigate this charge, now that this woman has come forward publicly. There should be a trial.

He should be jailed. He should have to give up custody of his daughters too. If his wife defends him the kids need to go into foster care.

STFU

If the MD DA determines the victim is credible, Kavanaugh should be charged and tried.

I agree. I said his kids need to be taken away unless his wife divorces him. Why should the authorities trust him around his girls, right?

Again, STFU.

Credible claims need to be taken seriously. Stop the badgering.

[Anonymous]

Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 52 year old man who chose to deny the event ever happened. For that lie, he should be held accountable.

This sort of behavior was so commonplace that I bet he didn't think anything of it. He will say she was flirting with him and they were just horsing around. That's if he even remembers it. He and his buddy sound like heavy drinkers who might have blacked out.

If he has an ounce of honor, he will remove himself from consideration and spare his family and this woman from any further investigation.

He has already denied it ever happened. If he now backtracks to say they were just horsing around, it further erodes what little credibility he has. He used his daughters as props, he has lied about many issues before the Senate.

Surely our country can do better.

We did. The GOP is the one that sucks. If Trump withdraws this douchecanoe and nominates, oh, Merrick Garland, he’ll have a normal confirmation in his hands. Easy win, Donnie!

Just do as we say. Because we aren’t the fascists. Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even the White House is not standing by Kavanaugh. They provided "no comment" - normally, they would reaffirm support and claim the nominee did nothing wrong.

So if Trump isn't standing by him, why is anyone here standing by him?

Not an official statement, but per Politico:

A lawyer close to the White House said the nomination will not be withdrawn. “No way, not even a hint of it. If anything, it’s the opposite. If somebody can be brought down by accusations like this, then you, me, every man certainly should be worried.”


Ok, so the suggestion is, every man has done this. Uh, no. Only in GOP Trump World is this the case.

What is astonishing is this lawyer close to the white house is not arguing that it is not true, but that men need to stick up & defend this

Does this really surprise you?

This is classic conservative spin. Everyone questioning the character of the victim is a republican. They basically believe any BS their party feeds them. Everything is fake news and liberal lies.

While the WH might want to move forward, Kavanaugh will not. He won't put his family through this. They'll spin it to preserve his reputation, but they won't proceed with the Supreme Court nomination.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even the White House is not standing by Kavanaugh. They provided "no comment" - normally, they would reaffirm support and claim the nominee did nothing wrong.

So if Trump isn't standing by him, why is anyone here standing by him?

Not an official statement, but per Politico:

A lawyer close to the White House said the nomination will not be withdrawn. “No way, not even a hint of it. If anything, it’s the opposite. If somebody can be brought down by accusations like this, then you, me, every man certainly should be worried.”


Ok, so the suggestion is, every man has done this. Uh, no. Only in GOP Trump World is this the case.

What is astonishing is this lawyer close to the white house is not arguing that it is not true, but that men need to stick up & defend this

That is your interpretation. Mine is "If somebody can be brought down by simply by unsubstantiated accusations that happened 35 years ago then you, me, every man certainly should be worried.” But perhaps I'm a little sensitive since my brother lost his job, his professional and community reputation and his home because of exactly this kind of rush to judgment and was found to have not done what some woman claimed he had.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no statute of limitations in Maryland for sexual assault. The Maryland DA should investigate this charge, now that this woman has come forward publicly. There should be a trial.

He should be jailed. He should have to give up custody of his daughters too. If his wife defends him the kids need to go into foster care.

I assume this is sarcasm.

Nope. Serious. Need to take this to the limit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even the White House is not standing by Kavanaugh. They provided "no comment" - normally, they would reaffirm support and claim the nominee did nothing wrong.

So if Trump isn't standing by him, why is anyone here standing by him?

Not an official statement, but per Politico:

A lawyer close to the White House said the nomination will not be withdrawn. “No way, not even a hint of it. If anything, it’s the opposite. If somebody can be brought down by accusations like this, then you, me, every man certainly should be worried.”

Ok, so the suggestion is, every man has done this. Uh, no. Only in GOP Trump World is this the case.

What is astonishing is this lawyer close to the white house is not arguing that it is not true, but that men need to stick up & defend this

That is your interpretation. Mine is "If somebody can be brought down by simply by unsubstantiated accusations that happened 35 years ago then you, me, every man certainly should be worried.” But perhaps I'm a little sensitive since my brother lost his job, his professional and community reputation and his home because of exactly this kind of rush to judgment and was found to have not done what some woman claimed he had.

Well, anonymous. I don’t believe you. Or your brother.

[Anonymous]

I would be happy to see Kavanaugh’s nomination fall apart because of this so long as we charge every underage black girl caught for shoplifting as an adult, along with every black and Hispanic minor who assaults a white person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grassley needs to delay the vote. There is no way this nomination should move forward without a thorough investigation of this allegation. The woman sounds credible. If she's lying, she needs to be found out. Hold hearings.

Disagree. Vote Kavanaugh in tomorrow. This alleged event occurred over thirty years when Justice Kavanaugh was a teenager. It’s not remotely relevant today. Not. Remotely.
Impressive Dem Hail Mary though.

I said upthread that doing this as a teenager is bad enough. Lying about it now is worse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he really was sort of a rich jerk drunken teen, how the heck did he get into Yale in the 80s? Correct me if I'm wrong but he's not Bush family rich & connected, is he?

He can be smart and be a complete misogynist a-hole. See Rob Porter.

Porter was/is connected. His dad was a big shot professor at Harvard.