Wow, I hope you’re making lots of money because your college education didn’t include reading comprehension, much less critical thinking! |
+100 |
Some of us have different definitions of elite. Those who are dumping on both Chicago and, earlier in the thread, Oberlin (which I attended), come across as anti-intellectual. Both of these schools have a track record of drawing kids who are notably smart and--equally notably--uninterested with money and with following the herd. Both are wildly overrepresented (esp Oberlin, given its size) among Macarthur "genius" grant recipients https://www.macfound.org/media/files/MacArthur_Fellows_-_Undergraduate_Degrees_1.pdf Both schools rank high in percent of students who go on to earn doctorates--so do Carleton and Grinnell: https://www.swarthmore.edu/institutional-research/doctorates-awarded And both are really not for everyone. Which is fine. But in my field and my world, both schools have a reputation for being pretty special. |
This is correct. |
I grew up in the Midwest, and no one would rank ND in the same class as UChicago and Northwestern. It's interesting, though. Discussions about where to apply here on DCUM always include UChicago and UMich. Northwestern is barely mentioned...and Wash U and ND almost never. Not sure what that means... But I would pick UChicago and UMich overall. UIUC for engineering only. Purdue for engineering, but lower than the other three. Grinnell and Carleton for LACs. |
Carleton and Grinnell do a lot better than Oberlin. |
|
Forbes has ND as number 2 in the midwest, behind only Chicago.
https://www.forbes.com/top-colleges/list/#tab:rank |
Snort |
It means ND is a Catholic school so only Catholics rank it high. It's like saying BYU is the best in the mid-west/Utah area. Yes, it's a premier destination for those in the faith but not so much for others. |
| Northwestern for smart, well rounded, happy kids. |
UChicago has a relatively poor HHI student body. UChicago boosters wish they had a far wealthier student body. UChicago boosters try to claim the student body is poor because of some unique noble mission (barf ) when really it’s because the college is most appealing to poor and middle class grinds, many Indian and Asian — not the smart and rich HHI who flock to more prestigious campuses.
|
|
Notre Dame isn’t known for being intellectual but to the masses it has a lot of cachet. Especially in the Midwest.
Nobody gives a damn about Chicago. Most have never heard of it. |
| Has our drunk-typing troll really submitted "barf" as an argument? |
Our family is mostly from Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas and parts of lower Michigan. The PP's post is exactly reflective of the perspective of our friends and relatives! They look at Notre Dame, a few Big 10 schools (Northwestern, Michigan, Wisconsin or Minnesota), Creighton, and then they look to schools on both coasts. STEM types in Michigan also look at Michigan Tech. Medical types also look at Minnesota for post-grad work b/c of Mayo. If they have heard of it, most of them would never even consider looking at Chicago. After reading the posts by the Chicago booster/s, I completely agree with them! |
This is such complete BS. There is no comparison between BYU and ND, just as there is no comparison between Catholics and Mormons in the US. There are more than 20 self-identified Catholics in this country per Mormon -- Catholicism is by far the largest single religion in the US and has a very diverse membership. Unlike BYU, ND is also by every quantifiable measure, one of the elite undergraduate institutions in this country. Its endowment, admissions statistics, and geographical distribution of its students are top 10-15 -- its endowment is larger than Chicago, Cornell, Duke and Wash U. MIT isn't attractive to most non-STEM students. Does that mean that MIT isn't a "premiere institution?" I smell bigotry . . . |