It is often necessary to pay over ask to get a home in the DMV. I'm not sure that your speculation about the agent is warranted although it may be. However, I do completely encourage people to write truthful reviews about their experiences with agents who were incompetent or bad in whatever way. It's really the only way to protect other people from having a bad experience too. |
I want to know too! 7 pages of bs yet no one has answered this. I call total bs. |
|
OOPP now 9 pages no answer.
Lies, all lies. |
No ones answering this at all. I don't think this is true... |
You really need instructions on how to get a commission rebate? Interview agents and ask for it. Use Upnest. Call some of the agents people have recommended. Type buyers agent commission rebate into google. If you need this degree of handholding, a rebating agent is probably not for you. |
Is that why NAR - your industry - is repeatedly guilty of violating antitrust law, fraud, market manipulation, and anti-consumer practices? Because the industry is about adding value to real estate transactions? If value occurs, it’s not by design. It's an exception. If you don’t like well-deserved, contemptible reputation the industry has inflicted on itself, find a new source of income. |
|
+1. And probably true for the dude who doesn't understand simple math and percentages. |
Best price? Agents get paid more when the house sells for more. Your interest are 180 degrees opposite from your clients. If you were a lawyer, that fee structure would be malpractice. How do you protect anyone’s interest? If there are contingencies, the buyer chooses whether or not to sign off (often with pressure from the agent to sign off). It’s not like you can write anything extra into a boilerplate contract - at least nothing extra that a seller would accept |
I think the divergent interests comes from the fact that the faster an offer if accepted, the less work it is for the agent. Which is why agents often encourage buyers to bid above asking -- it increases the chance of getting the deal done. I don't think the incremental amount of money from a higher offer is the motivating factor (though it doesn't hurt). Lawyers have fee structures which often are not aligned with clients also. Consider this, if a defense lawyer wins a big case on a motion to dismiss, the case is over -- no more hours to bill. But if they lose the motion to dismiss, it means millions of dollars spent doing labor-intensive document discovery and depositions. So losing the motion is actually best for the lawyers' financial interests in an hourly billing system. Same thing later in the case at summary judgment. Losing means more fees because the case goes to trial, which means millions more in billables. It's actually a deeply flawed system. Not defending agents here, but just think it's important to be clear about how the incentives work. |
You obviously didnt understand any thing that I said. |
Maybe your sisters divorce lawyer is being paid by the other adverse party? Oh wait, that conflict of interest wouldn't be allowed. That's only allowed in the corrupt real estate industry, because "value". |
| This is not a thing. |
|
This is very common. I ended up buying 2 properties in Virginia and used Subba Kolla as my agent and ended up getting back everything above 1% from the commission he received.
Most of the agents don't do significant work to deserve 2 or 3% commission and it's about time they started sharing |