"A ton of student loans" means that they are not Top or Upper Class since those loans wouldn't exist if there was substantial inherited wealth. Since that $350k income is earned income and not passive income (and hence would stop if the person stopped working), the person would be Upper Middle Class. If the $350k was a one-time occurrence, the person could be Middle Class or lower. |
It is, but the context was that this $350k family lives in $1M home, flashy cars, and taking first-class trips to Europe. That's really not the representative lifestyle of people making $350k/year in this area. Yes, $1M homes, but usually they're spending $ on childcare, private schools, and saving for retirement and investing (hopefully). |
I'm the $365K poster.
We're early 40's and have only had this income level for the past 3 years. Prior to that we were at $250K. If I'm being totally -our house is worth 1.3K, purchased for 975K with no prior equity (just a downpayment). -we also just bought a beach house for $350K. -we have 3 kids in public school -we just returned from 2 weeks in Asia and kids have been to Europe twice the last 2 years. -We max out 2 401ks and save aggressively for college. -2 of our kids play travel sports at ~$2-3K a year EACH. -2 of our kids take piano lessons at $1600 a year EACH. -we still save ~50K a year. All this on 2 years at $365k income. Prior to that we had a $250K income for 10 years. Prior to that we made about $130K since age 25 NO inherited money. ~$100k in student loans that we paid off by living very, very frugally the first year out of grad school at age 30. We were making $250K and paid off $100K that year. Anyway, i consider ourselves upper middle class. No one will convince me that we're not. We have more money than we need. We own a second home. We vacation internationally yearly. And yes, we could afford to fly first class. |
Of course not, but you ain't starting in the mailroom at $22K if you're making $350k while your kids are still in school. At some point, right before you're having that first kid and moving to the million dollar neighborhood you're making at least a very significant fraction of that $350k. If you're making $150K plus, are saddled with loans (and are concerned that you can't live the future lifestyle you want with those payments), and are contemplating that move to North Arlington or Tenleytown - take a break, live simply, ditch the BMW for the bus, get a room in a group house in Petworth or wherever is cheap, put all your money towards your loans and you will easily pay them off in a couple years. I don't know if you ever did start at the bottom, but I did. My first job out of college paid $30K in 2010. I could easily go back to living that lifestyle and if I did it with a $150K income I could put $70K a year towards loans. Or more realistically, maintain that 1BR lifestyle you probably already had when you first entered the workforce and put all your income gains into your loans and when that time comes to start a family they will have been long gone. |
In my opinion that still makes them pretty well off -- but YMMV. |
NP but just wanted to say that I'm a teacher and I'd love to make 80k! Probably will never make that much in my career. And I have a master's degree and certifications in 7 different grade/subject areas. |
If you were making six figures starting at age 25, of course you can afford all of the above! I believe I was at $36k. |
By assuming this vast wealth is "normal," you're making yourselves objectively less happy and raising your children to be unable to participate normally in the workplace and society. My family makes half of what people are talking about on here, and we never spend a minute thinking we don't have enough or we wish we had as much as our neighbors. You are seriously stressing yourselves out with all this crap about "we're just getting by." And you're teaching your children that the only possible careers are law, medicine, or private equity or else they won't be able to "get by." This is beyond whining, you are actually causing yourselves harm living in a world where you think $350k or $400k is not enough. |
Yes, pretty well off = comfortable. |
It's more than comfortable. |
Comfortable is pretty subjective. If you think you are JUST comfortable with a million dollar home, fully funding retirement and college accounts AND investing - then so be it. Nothing I can say is going to change your mind. Pretty sad honestly. |
"And how do you think this type of out-of-touch bubble thinking is received by the real middle class in America, earning $80k combined, living in a 1500 square foot home built 50 years ago, paying the bills, and maybe....maybe....being able to afford a week at the beach?
Or, what about the lower-middle and working class, making do on $50k, and renting an apartment in a so-so neighborhood, and staying in a Motel 6 during vacation? Because that group comprises the largest voting block, and they are turned off by the bubble talk." So how should people with $200K + HHI appeal to the vast majority voting bloc? |
You don't always know other people's situations. . . they could have family that is sick that relies on them for medical and other financial support . . . very common these days. |
If you're busting your ass billing 2000+ hours per year, "comfortable" isn't exactly the word I'd use. It's definitely a lot of income, but there's no freedom if you can't walk away from your job. Comfort would be having the $350k in passive income from investments. That level of wealth (as opposed to income) is difficult to achieve. You need about 25 times your annual spending in investments to achieve it. |
Right? We're at $330k, two income household. DH drives 1.5 hours each way every day to get that paycheck. And yes, he could look for another job, but he just started this job 1/2 year ago after leaving a job that required him to travel 100%. Are we thankful every day for the opportunities we've been given? Yes. Do we feel like we're living the life of luxury? No. |