Rapes in Israel Gaza.

[Anonymous]

I bet this is just empty threats. Imagine all the horrific things that would come out about Israel's sexual violence at discovery time if a lawsuit lawsuit went through.

[Anonymous]

Regarding the Kristof column. Let’s put aside the dog rape stuff and focus on one additional specific example of why it was such poor and indefensible journalism. There were two named victims of sexual assault by Israeli soldiers in Kristof’s column.

One of them Issa Amro. He was detained and interrogated for 10 hours on 10/7.

The only problem? He himself put out the below video about what happened to him that day. I will link to it in this week’s newsletter. In the video, he claims his hands were tied tightly, they cursed at him, and he was hit several times. But at no point does he suggest anything even close to sexual assault.

Two weeks later, he was interviewed by ABC news. Again, no mention of sexual assault. He would later be interviewed by the Washington Post and would claim he was threatened with sexual assault (but not that it occurred). This person repeatedly talked about the events that day and never once claimed sexual assault except when it became convenient to fit Kristof’s narrative to provide evidence of a systemic problem. And no, it’s not a coincidence that this activist has done a ton of media.

Did Kristof know that there was a contemporaneous account from one of the two named alleged victims that does not claim sexual assault? Did the NYT editors know the person being cited changed their story?

Was Amro even asked why his story changed?

None of this seemed to matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I bet this is just empty threats. Imagine all the horrific things that would come out about Israel's sexual violence at discovery time if a lawsuit lawsuit went through.

I doubt they are empty threats. I hope he does sue and wins big.
This story is a work of fiction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Regarding the Kristof column. Let’s put aside the dog rape stuff and focus on one additional specific example of why it was such poor and indefensible journalism. There were two named victims of sexual assault by Israeli soldiers in Kristof’s column.

One of them Issa Amro. He was detained and interrogated for 10 hours on 10/7.

The only problem? He himself put out the below video about what happened to him that day. I will link to it in this week’s newsletter. In the video, he claims his hands were tied tightly, they cursed at him, and he was hit several times. But at no point does he suggest anything even close to sexual assault.

Two weeks later, he was interviewed by ABC news. Again, no mention of sexual assault. He would later be interviewed by the Washington Post and would claim he was threatened with sexual assault (but not that it occurred). This person repeatedly talked about the events that day and never once claimed sexual assault except when it became convenient to fit Kristof’s narrative to provide evidence of a systemic problem. And no, it’s not a coincidence that this activist has done a ton of media.

Did Kristof know that there was a contemporaneous account from one of the two named alleged victims that does not claim sexual assault? Did the NYT editors know the person being cited changed their story?

Was Amro even asked why his story changed?

None of this seemed to matter.

It's possible he added to his original statement, and it's possible he did not. PP, how many sexual assault victims have you actual set down and talked with. For some of us, it takes years to come to terms with what happened and say it out loud. It takes feeling safe and encouragement to speak our truths. As I am not a man, I can only imagine that it is twice as difficult. But of course, YMMV with your own sexual assault recovery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I bet this is just empty threats. Imagine all the horrific things that would come out about Israel's sexual violence at discovery time if a lawsuit lawsuit went through.

I doubt they are empty threats. I hope he does sue and wins big.
This story is a work of fiction.

What makes you so confident in saying that?

The IDF's own Chief JAG was forced to resign because she tried to prosecute a gang rape that was caught on film.

Israeli detention facilities are under the control and leadership of Ben Gvir, leader of the Jew Power party (that's ita actual name). He was convicted by Israeli courts of inciting terrorism, regularly leads chants of "Kill the Arabs", celebrated settlers that murdered a Palestinian baby by cooking it in an oven, etc etc

This does not seem to be at all unusual.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Regarding the Kristof column. Let’s put aside the dog rape stuff and focus on one additional specific example of why it was such poor and indefensible journalism. There were two named victims of sexual assault by Israeli soldiers in Kristof’s column.

One of them Issa Amro. He was detained and interrogated for 10 hours on 10/7.

The only problem? He himself put out the below video about what happened to him that day. I will link to it in this week’s newsletter. In the video, he claims his hands were tied tightly, they cursed at him, and he was hit several times. But at no point does he suggest anything even close to sexual assault.

Two weeks later, he was interviewed by ABC news. Again, no mention of sexual assault. He would later be interviewed by the Washington Post and would claim he was threatened with sexual assault (but not that it occurred). This person repeatedly talked about the events that day and never once claimed sexual assault except when it became convenient to fit Kristof’s narrative to provide evidence of a systemic problem. And no, it’s not a coincidence that this activist has done a ton of media.

Did Kristof know that there was a contemporaneous account from one of the two named alleged victims that does not claim sexual assault? Did the NYT editors know the person being cited changed their story?

Was Amro even asked why his story changed?

None of this seemed to matter.

Give it a rest. Israel has been raping since its inception and there's video, independent investigations and testimony by Zionists themselves. You wrote all of this crap for nothing. Coupled w/ the fact that you never do this when it comes to the obvious lies of Israel incl that preposterous report written about mass rape by Hamas w/ recycled lies, by a known liar, no one takes any of you seriously.

You know what you monsters are doing once again? You're doing the same thing as when there was debate over who bombed ONE hospital as you ignored Israel had bombed every other hospital, university, school, etc etc etc.

What do you think you're even accomplishing when none of you has had the guts to say anything about "Screams without words" written by a f***ing IOF being published as NEWS and to this day, the NYT hasn't had the guts to retract. I'm actually glad the NYT is going through this attack by rabid Zionists. It's well-deserved for having laundered the crimes of Israel for 80 years.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Today is Nakba day ironically. Israeli historians Benny Morris and Illan Pappe have well documented the mass rapes, along with innumerable other war crimes, committed by Zionist forces.

Almost a 80 years later, nothing much has really changed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

You seem to have skipped over who came up with that idea

[Anonymous]

Mileikowsky doesn’t want Israel to be vilified after decades of such horrific treatment of Palestinians. Of course they will somehow play the victim in all of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The lunatics are trying to claim that dogs can’t rape as if the one holding the leash wouldn’t be the one who’s actually using the dog to penetrate. Suddenly bestiality doesn’t exist at all. It’s amazing how these demons just move the goal posts, meanwhile, Pinochet’s Chile and Nazis did it, so I guess now we can question that the Nazis did it since the very people currently claiming it’s a lie are saying Jews lied about Nazis doing it, right?

All you have to do is watch the translation of Israeli TV. These demons admit everything that they do with smiles on their faces, They’re depraved monsters.

Zionist best argument is canine rape is impossible, despite the many Palestinians who have described it, and that at least three different medical journal articles discuss rectal injuries in humans from anal penetration by dogs. It was also used in Pinochet’s prisons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I bet this is just empty threats. Imagine all the horrific things that would come out about Israel's sexual violence at discovery time if a lawsuit lawsuit went through.

I doubt they are empty threats. I hope he does sue and wins big.
This story is a work of fiction.

Lol. Funny. Highly unlikely they’d sue. Please explain their legal argument and position if you think it’s possible.

And no way they’d win. Ever.

[Anonymous]

Any updates on this purported lawsuit that Israel will be filing? Coming from a nation killing hundreds of thousands of civilians most of them are children and women and still have the audacity to talk about law and justice

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I bet this is just empty threats. Imagine all the horrific things that would come out about Israel's sexual violence at discovery time if a lawsuit lawsuit went through.

I doubt they are empty threats. I hope he does sue and wins big.
This story is a work of fiction.

Israel is a work of fiction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I bet this is just empty threats. Imagine all the horrific things that would come out about Israel's sexual violence at discovery time if a lawsuit lawsuit went through.

I doubt they are empty threats. I hope he does sue and wins big.
This story is a work of fiction.

Israel is a work of fiction.

Israel is a terrorist organization that is openly funded by multiple countries. Child trafficking, blackmail, institutionalized rape, illegal organ harvesting, and genocide are just a normal aspect of its existence.