Rapes in Israel Gaza.

[Anonymous]

I find it interesting to see the other thread right next to this one re opening the October 7 discussion on rapes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The lunatics are trying to claim that dogs can’t rape as if the one holding the leash wouldn’t be the one who’s actually using the dog to penetrate. Suddenly bestiality doesn’t exist at all. It’s amazing how these demons just move the goal posts, meanwhile, Pinochet’s Chile and Nazis did it, so I guess now we can question that the Nazis did it since the very people currently claiming it’s a lie are saying Jews lied about Nazis doing it, right?

All you have to do is watch the translation of Israeli TV. These demons admit everything that they do with smiles on their faces, They’re depraved monsters.

Zionist best argument is canine rape is impossible, despite the many Palestinians who have described it, and that at least three different medical journal articles discuss rectal injuries in humans from anal penetration by dogs. It was also used in Pinochet’s prisons.

Despite the many Jewish Holocaust survivors who claimed it happened to them and other Jewish prisoners, these same descendants are implying their ancestors lied about their treatment under Nazi Germany.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting to see the other thread right next to this one re opening the October 7 discussion on rapes

The report just came out. This story was to counter the anticipated release of the report.

[Anonymous]

Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.

[Anonymous]

Israelis don't consider themselves to be raping people because they don't view Palestinians as people but rather as something subhuman. Not unexpected from a state that is an apartheid system

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.

There were 12 firsthand accounts of the rape. Given the nature of the Israeli regime, I'm far more inclined to believe this is inline with their behavior. If you're willing to genocide a population, then raping them is pretty acceptable in their view.

[Anonymous]

Rape of Palestinians prisoners has been widely reported and documented for years. Israelis openly praised the Sde Teiman rapists as heroes. Even as it was filmed on camera for the world to see.

Plus, Israel blocks Red Cross access to these prisons as required by the Geneva Conventions. Indicating a coverup.

[Anonymous]

Ironically this person is denying parts of the Holocaust

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.

STOP WITH THE LIES.

I have had enough of you dragging that good man’s name in the mud. Just stop it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.

STOP WITH THE LIES.

I have had enough of you dragging that good man’s name in the mud. Just stop it.

The NYT typically has good fact checking and certainly would have perfected it for this piece

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.

STOP WITH THE LIES.

I have had enough of you dragging that good man’s name in the mud. Just stop it.

You have to understand that Netanyahu said the spend millions of dollars to pay influencers aka trolls to flood social media with positive Israeli tales, and negative ones about anyone disagreeing with Israel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.

STOP WITH THE LIES.

I have had enough of you dragging that good man’s name in the mud. Just stop it.

The NYT typically has good fact checking and certainly would have perfected it for this piece

It is really disorienting to see the same people who loudly excoriated the NYT for its reporting about the rape and torture of women on 10/7 now praising the NYT lavishly, while their counterparts have switched their positions. Opposite Day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.

STOP WITH THE LIES.

I have had enough of you dragging that good man’s name in the mud. Just stop it.

The NYT typically has good fact checking and certainly would have perfected it for this piece

It is really disorienting to see the same people who loudly excoriated the NYT for its reporting about the rape and torture of women on 10/7 now praising the NYT lavishly, while their counterparts have switched their positions. Opposite Day.

Why can’t both be true? Right now it’s in Israel’s hands to stop. And the US could link funding to not violating international law.

[Anonymous]

Israel will go down as one of history’s greatest villains.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kristof mentions two people with firsthand accounts. One of them Isso Amro, has changed his story. His initial accounts on multiple occasions have no mention of sexual assault. The New York Times was apparently ignorant of this, or just didn't care.

STOP WITH THE LIES.

I have had enough of you dragging that good man’s name in the mud. Just stop it.

The NYT typically has good fact checking and certainly would have perfected it for this piece

It is really disorienting to see the same people who loudly excoriated the NYT for its reporting about the rape and torture of women on 10/7 now praising the NYT lavishly, while their counterparts have switched their positions. Opposite Day.

But that is not happening here at all. Why do you always always lie? I didn’t lavish praise on the NYT. I merely said they are known as good fact checkers but like every org breaking huge news (the few that are left), mistakes are made.