Met Gala fashion, anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This dress is AMAZING. Love.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

If I never had to see this face again it would be too soon. Repulsive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bee Carrozzini, Wintour's daughter, looking great too. I like how the threads of the embroidery are left hanging loose at the bottom. It's a passing nod to the assignment.

Beautiful and unique. I love ths shade of red.

I love this dress and it looks great on her

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If I never had to see this face again it would be too soon. Repulsive.

I thought this was a real housewife at first. Yikes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Boring makeup boring hair boring dress.

It's the point. In recent weeks, she's had a series of high profile hit pieces criticizing her enjoyment of ill-gotten riches, and her penchant for cosmetic enhancements and sartorial get ups. This is her answer: I can be boring too. Except that the bosom will out and she couldn't resist the mermaid look.

I get what you're saying, but to me the antidote to those stories is to show up looking elegant and discreet. This look doesn't move her reputation forward at all.

Ha. This IS her version of elegant and discreet, PP. She is at heart a vulgar person, and her body is a little wide for the usual "slim elegance" looks. If she were to cover that bosom with a flowy top, she'd look fat. She's also very warm and kind-hearted in real life, BTW, so I don't want to be too mean. I don't mean vulgar in a moral sense, but in a visual sense. She just doesn't understand subtlety and restraint.

She is vulgar in ever sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Boring makeup boring hair boring dress.

And if she did something over the top, people would be b itching about how she's gaudy, nouveau riche, etc.

Don't get me wrong, it's still gaudy with the neckline, but a very boring look overall. I get people shouldn't hate on her for no reason, but this is the Met gala and presumably she lobbied to be the main sponsor. Her look is disappointing.

For no reason? You're kidding, right?

Not kidding. This is the beauty and fashion forum and we are critiquing her look (which I think is a miss.). You're free to hate on her for moral or other reasons in another forum (or here I guess if you want, but it would be OT).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Boring makeup boring hair boring dress.

I like this dress, the color and jewel strap especially. It's plain and chic. I think this is one of her best looks. The problem is that her figure is so cartoonish. She is not built like a model/mannequin! She doesn't have a lot of options with breasts that large. She is a real life Jessica Rabbit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Beyonce

WTAF?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Boring makeup boring hair boring dress.

I like this dress, the color and jewel strap especially. It's plain and chic. I think this is one of her best looks. The problem is that her figure is so cartoonish. She is not built like a model/mannequin! She doesn't have a lot of options with breasts that large. She is a real life Jessica Rabbit.

Trying to channel the John Singer Sargent portrait was a bad idea. She's not built *at all* like a Sargent model or the ideal of the time, so the dress looks cartoonish rather than elegant. Also, the hair is wrong for the look and so boring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Very Blake

This was pretty triumphant. She must feel like a 4,000 lb weight has been lifted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure if this is on theme, but Carey Mulligan's dress has a cool effect.

I was about to post almost the same comment! Cool dress. I guess its like wearing abstract art.

This is absolutely darling. I love the dress, her hair, and her smile. She looks great!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very Blake

This was pretty triumphant. She must feel like a 4,000 lb weight has been lifted.

This picture doesn’t even do the dress justice, the train was extra extravagantly, beautiful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How does she have such a narrow waist after 3 kids?!!

She can and has bought everything about her appearance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Boring makeup boring hair boring dress.

It's the point. In recent weeks, she's had a series of high profile hit pieces criticizing her enjoyment of ill-gotten riches, and her penchant for cosmetic enhancements and sartorial get ups. This is her answer: I can be boring too. Except that the bosom will out and she couldn't resist the mermaid look.

I get what you're saying, but to me the antidote to those stories is to show up looking elegant and discreet. This look doesn't move her reputation forward at all.

Ha. This IS her version of elegant and discreet, PP. She is at heart a vulgar person, and her body is a little wide for the usual "slim elegance" looks. If she were to cover that bosom with a flowy top, she'd look fat. She's also very warm and kind-hearted in real life, BTW, so I don't want to be too mean. I don't mean vulgar in a moral sense, but in a visual sense. She just doesn't understand subtlety and restraint.

Do you know her in real life? She doesn't seem to understand philanthropy or giving back, which is a big indicator of being kind-hearted. She does seem sort of fun though

[Anonymous]

It's like no one has ever moved on from the camp theme