WTAF is up with Sentebale's latest lawsuit against Prince Harry?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

+1. When you’re earning £25m/year while a fifth of your country struggles with poverty (no kidding, look it up), you really need to do something. I guess constitutionally he can’t get involved with policy, so cutting ribbons it is.

England imported a ton of poverty, culture clashes and dependency over the past decade.

That is a political issue, not a royal family issue.

Ugh, gross. Tell is without telling us that a lot of the anti-Meghan hate is race-based.

But you're not even answering the question. If anything, an increasingly brown and black population is going to relate to the monarchy even less.

You don't speak for anyone. But caring about "Meghan" isn't an issue most Brits care about. She's an American, living in America. Not their problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

Britain needs to have a conversation with itself about what the monarchy needs to do to stay relevant and keep its position. Making racist arguments about the country's poverty being down to immigration doesn't begin to solve the monarchy's specific viability problem.

Polling repeatedly shows that 1/3 or more of Britain's population doesn't support the monarchy. This climbs a lot higher for younger Brits. So when you see that 70% like Charles, or something, usually that's 70% of people who support the monarchy, and a true figure for Charles' own support would need to be scaled down by 1/3 to under 50%. And the problem is only going to get worse as the royalists die out. So the monarchy needs to figure it out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

Britain needs to have a conversation with itself about what the monarchy needs to do to stay relevant and keep its position. Making racist arguments about the country's poverty being down to immigration doesn't begin to solve the monarchy's specific viability problem.

Polling repeatedly shows that 1/3 or more of Britain's population doesn't support the monarchy. This climbs a lot higher for younger Brits. So when you see that 70% like Charles, or something, usually that's 70% of people who support the monarchy, and a true figure for Charles' own support would need to be scaled down by 1/3 to under 50%. And the problem is only going to get worse as the royalists die out. So the monarchy needs to figure it out.

So you want them to ignore the big problems and focus on the little ones because you're mad Harry and Meghan got the boot?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And there it is. It's often said that the Venn diagram of MAGA and royalists/Sussex haters is a circle.

That's ridiculous. I'm the opposite of MAGA - I curse the MAGAs I see and can't wait to see them out of power. I canvassed door-to-door for Harris.

I also think H&M are big grifters who didn't think twice about using those poor cancer kids FACES for H&M's publicity, yet refuse to show their own children's faces on social media. Such hypocrites. So much for them claiming they want privacy - they want the complete opposite!

You can call me a Sussex hater if you want (just because I notice obvious grifting) but please don't call me MAGA!

Hit a nerve? Sure, we all know lots of racist liberals who blame immigration for the US' problems.

Not.

I didn't care for Meghan's show. But liars like you make me feel sorry for her. The photo showed the back of the cancer kid's head, so you could only see Meghan's face (and derangers like you tried to turn Meghan's face into an evil, calculating look, but whatever). You're forgetting that Kate was the one who used a cancer kid's actual face last year. And the Sussexes never said they want privacy--that's a lie and you can't find a source for that--they said they wanted boundaries and for the press to stop tapping their phones. Learn the difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

Britain needs to have a conversation with itself about what the monarchy needs to do to stay relevant and keep its position. Making racist arguments about the country's poverty being down to immigration doesn't begin to solve the monarchy's specific viability problem.

Polling repeatedly shows that 1/3 or more of Britain's population doesn't support the monarchy. This climbs a lot higher for younger Brits. So when you see that 70% like Charles, or something, usually that's 70% of people who support the monarchy, and a true figure for Charles' own support would need to be scaled down by 1/3 to under 50%. And the problem is only going to get worse as the royalists die out. So the monarchy needs to figure it out.

So you want them to ignore the big problems and focus on the little ones because you're mad Harry and Meghan got the boot?

Stop deflecting and lying. We ARE discussing the monarchy here, we're not trying to solve Britain's 1/5th poverty rate (again, look that up) on an American mom's website. Also, the Sussexes didn't get the boot. They left voluntarily because the tabloid-palace press in Britain was making their lives unbearable and causing Meghan to consider suicide.

So: Why are you caping for William when you're so out of step with Britain's own polls and economic situation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

Britain needs to have a conversation with itself about what the monarchy needs to do to stay relevant and keep its position. Making racist arguments about the country's poverty being down to immigration doesn't begin to solve the monarchy's specific viability problem.

Polling repeatedly shows that 1/3 or more of Britain's population doesn't support the monarchy. This climbs a lot higher for younger Brits. So when you see that 70% like Charles, or something, usually that's 70% of people who support the monarchy, and a true figure for Charles' own support would need to be scaled down by 1/3 to under 50%. And the problem is only going to get worse as the royalists die out. So the monarchy needs to figure it out.

That is not exactly how math and stats work...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

Britain needs to have a conversation with itself about what the monarchy needs to do to stay relevant and keep its position. Making racist arguments about the country's poverty being down to immigration doesn't begin to solve the monarchy's specific viability problem.

Polling repeatedly shows that 1/3 or more of Britain's population doesn't support the monarchy. This climbs a lot higher for younger Brits. So when you see that 70% like Charles, or something, usually that's 70% of people who support the monarchy, and a true figure for Charles' own support would need to be scaled down by 1/3 to under 50%. And the problem is only going to get worse as the royalists die out. So the monarchy needs to figure it out.

I have no clue what the answer is. It may just be cutting ribbons. The late Queen said the royals needed to be seen to be believed, and she might have had a point.

Maybe downsizing a bit. They don't need £25m/year. Maybe they open up royal finances to daylight, so we can see what's up with the royal gift shops and royal warrants, and what tax rate they're paying, if any.

Maybe finding real passions. The public can see straight through the charades of caring about homelessness and the environment when the Waleses just claimed their umpteenth palace and fly everywhere in helicopters, including to a soccer game last week. And those patronizing quarterly 2-minute nature videos, put together by someone else while they sign off from the comfort of their palaces, are not it either. I dunno, but they haven't found it yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

Britain needs to have a conversation with itself about what the monarchy needs to do to stay relevant and keep its position. Making racist arguments about the country's poverty being down to immigration doesn't begin to solve the monarchy's specific viability problem.

Polling repeatedly shows that 1/3 or more of Britain's population doesn't support the monarchy. This climbs a lot higher for younger Brits. So when you see that 70% like Charles, or something, usually that's 70% of people who support the monarchy, and a true figure for Charles' own support would need to be scaled down by 1/3 to under 50%. And the problem is only going to get worse as the royalists die out. So the monarchy needs to figure it out.

That is not exactly how math and stats work...

OK. You tell us. If 2/3 of the Brits support the monarchy (1/3 don't support), and of those two-thirds 70% like a particular royal, then it sure looks like 46.2% (=.70*.66) of the TOTAL British population support that particular royal.

Now show your own math. We'll wait!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And there it is. It's often said that the Venn diagram of MAGA and royalists/Sussex haters is a circle.

That's ridiculous. I'm the opposite of MAGA - I curse the MAGAs I see and can't wait to see them out of power. I canvassed door-to-door for Harris.

I also think H&M are big grifters who didn't think twice about using those poor cancer kids FACES for H&M's publicity, yet refuse to show their own children's faces on social media. Such hypocrites. So much for them claiming they want privacy - they want the complete opposite!

You can call me a Sussex hater if you want (just because I notice obvious grifting) but please don't call me MAGA!

Hit a nerve? Sure, we all know lots of racist liberals who blame immigration for the US' problems.

Not.

I didn't care for Meghan's show. But liars like you make me feel sorry for her. The photo showed the back of the cancer kid's head, so you could only see Meghan's face (and derangers like you tried to turn Meghan's face into an evil, calculating look, but whatever). You're forgetting that Kate was the one who used a cancer kid's actual face last year. And the Sussexes never said they want privacy--that's a lie and you can't find a source for that--they said they wanted boundaries and for the press to stop tapping their phones. Learn the difference.

You're the liar. I just googled and found at least 5 photos of H&M and the hospital kids full faces. Apparently I can't post the link here, but it's easy to find them. They come up right at the top of the search.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And there it is. It's often said that the Venn diagram of MAGA and royalists/Sussex haters is a circle.

That's ridiculous. I'm the opposite of MAGA - I curse the MAGAs I see and can't wait to see them out of power. I canvassed door-to-door for Harris.

I also think H&M are big grifters who didn't think twice about using those poor cancer kids FACES for H&M's publicity, yet refuse to show their own children's faces on social media. Such hypocrites. So much for them claiming they want privacy - they want the complete opposite!

You can call me a Sussex hater if you want (just because I notice obvious grifting) but please don't call me MAGA!

Hit a nerve? Sure, we all know lots of racist liberals who blame immigration for the US' problems.

Not.

I didn't care for Meghan's show. But liars like you make me feel sorry for her. The photo showed the back of the cancer kid's head, so you could only see Meghan's face (and derangers like you tried to turn Meghan's face into an evil, calculating look, but whatever). You're forgetting that Kate was the one who used a cancer kid's actual face last year. And the Sussexes never said they want privacy--that's a lie and you can't find a source for that--they said they wanted boundaries and for the press to stop tapping their phones. Learn the difference.

You're the liar. I just googled and found at least 5 photos of H&M and the hospital kids full faces. Apparently I can't post the link here, but it's easy to find them. They come up right at the top of the search.

Of course you can post the pictures here. Click on the "img" (for PDFs or PNGs) or "url" (for weblinks) right above your post, making sure to click before and after your links.

I mean, even if you did find children's faces, is that so bad? Your beloved Kate does it all the time. What about Kate using cancer patient Liz Hatton repeatedly, and showing Liz's face on the royal insta page?

Also, surely the parents signed something. The Sussexes must be very well aware that one of their previous visits to sick children ended up with haters like you sending hate tweets to the sick childrens' parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And there it is. It's often said that the Venn diagram of MAGA and royalists/Sussex haters is a circle.

That's ridiculous. I'm the opposite of MAGA - I curse the MAGAs I see and can't wait to see them out of power. I canvassed door-to-door for Harris.

I also think H&M are big grifters who didn't think twice about using those poor cancer kids FACES for H&M's publicity, yet refuse to show their own children's faces on social media. Such hypocrites. So much for them claiming they want privacy - they want the complete opposite!

You can call me a Sussex hater if you want (just because I notice obvious grifting) but please don't call me MAGA!

Hit a nerve? Sure, we all know lots of racist liberals who blame immigration for the US' problems.

Not.

I didn't care for Meghan's show. But liars like you make me feel sorry for her. The photo showed the back of the cancer kid's head, so you could only see Meghan's face (and derangers like you tried to turn Meghan's face into an evil, calculating look, but whatever). You're forgetting that Kate was the one who used a cancer kid's actual face last year. And the Sussexes never said they want privacy--that's a lie and you can't find a source for that--they said they wanted boundaries and for the press to stop tapping their phones. Learn the difference.

You're the liar. I just googled and found at least 5 photos of H&M and the hospital kids full faces. Apparently I can't post the link here, but it's easy to find them. They come up right at the top of the search.

Of course you can post the pictures here. Click on the "img" (for PDFs or PNGs) or "url" (for weblinks) right above your post, making sure to click before and after your links.

I mean, even if you did find children's faces, is that so bad? Your beloved Kate does it all the time. What about Kate using cancer patient Liz Hatton repeatedly, and showing Liz's face on the royal insta page?

Also, surely the parents signed something. The Sussexes must be very well aware that one of their previous visits to sick children ended up with haters like you sending hate tweets to the sick childrens' parents.

* sorry, forgot to mention, Liz was a child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

Britain needs to have a conversation with itself about what the monarchy needs to do to stay relevant and keep its position. Making racist arguments about the country's poverty being down to immigration doesn't begin to solve the monarchy's specific viability problem.

Polling repeatedly shows that 1/3 or more of Britain's population doesn't support the monarchy. This climbs a lot higher for younger Brits. So when you see that 70% like Charles, or something, usually that's 70% of people who support the monarchy, and a true figure for Charles' own support would need to be scaled down by 1/3 to under 50%. And the problem is only going to get worse as the royalists die out. So the monarchy needs to figure it out.

That is not exactly how math and stats work...

OK. You tell us. If 2/3 of the Brits support the monarchy (1/3 don't support), and of those two-thirds 70% like a particular royal, then it sure looks like 46.2% (=.70*.66) of the TOTAL British population support that particular royal.

Now show your own math. We'll wait!

Kate and William's fans here are dumb as bricks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.

I don’t see William as lazy at all. Sounds like Sussex camp feeding the media

DP. You can look up the numbers yourself and see that William did substantially less work than his dad has while dealing with cancer and did less than 202 royal engagements in 2025. When you consider a countable thing is a zoom meeting with staff then that is basically nothing.

I think that you can argue that the royal work they do is basically useless and stupid but if you accept the job then it’s lazy not to do the work.

+1. When you’re earning £25m/year while a fifth of your country struggles with poverty (no kidding, look it up), you really need to do something. I guess constitutionally he can’t get involved with policy, so cutting ribbons it is.

England imported a ton of poverty, culture clashes and dependency over the past decade.

That is a political issue, not a royal family issue.

DP. How does this follow? Because they’re wasting money on one set of people best to ignore another set they are wasting money on?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

+100

This is how I see it too. The gossip mags may print unflattering things about stripping titles, but this just seems like more media lies.

I dunno. Tom Sykes claims to be well-connected, although as is often the case, his "sources" could just be his own whims. https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-william-plots-bonfire-of-royal-titles-when-he-becomes-king/

I hope he strips h and m titles. They claimed they wanted out but continue to try to use it to make money.

Taking the titles away isn’t going to do anything unless it also causes mass amnesia as to who they are related to. The bulk of the entertainment market is Americans it’s meaningless to them to no longer be Duke and Duchess of Sussex. The mistake was not enticing them to stay in the fold in order to maintain control.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

+100

This is how I see it too. The gossip mags may print unflattering things about stripping titles, but this just seems like more media lies.

I dunno. Tom Sykes claims to be well-connected, although as is often the case, his "sources" could just be his own whims. https://www.thedailybeast.com/prince-william-plots-bonfire-of-royal-titles-when-he-becomes-king/

I hope he strips h and m titles. They claimed they wanted out but continue to try to use it to make money.

I mean, Charles has any number of gift shops at his various residences, where he sells jam, china, dog bowls, and Burberry. The money goes into his pockets too, and not into renovations which are still picked up by British taxpayers. Zara Tindall has multiple brand deals. How is this different?

Charles and Zara both actually serve and respect the people of England.

How does Zara serve the people of England?