GDS college enrolmments

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a GDS parent. We’re just getting underway re this. While I don’t love the cap, it has logic. Kids we know at other schools are applying to 18-22 colleges. That seems pretty nutty. I would be surprised if these kids can really execute successfully on that many school applications. Plus there are cases where top students run the table on all the top schools making it harder for everyone else. Sidwell does seem to have joined the private school-to-uchicago thing quite effectively as have some NY private schools. Beyond that, there are a lot of hooked kids in all these private schools for the Ivy League in particular. So I, at least, take the whole thing w a degree of humility. I certainly wouldn’t have picked another school for my kids based on this.

Oooh, is that why WIS sends so many to UChicago? That was one of the things that surprised me on their matriculation list. I expected more of an international spread (with, of course, the usual Ivies and top American schools), but UChicago showed up a lot. I had no idea it was "a thing".

WIS does not send that many kids to UChicago. Maybe 1 per year.

According to their school profile, they sent 15 in the past 3 years... I would say that is enough to surprise me

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a GDS parent. We’re just getting underway re this. While I don’t love the cap, it has logic. Kids we know at other schools are applying to 18-22 colleges. That seems pretty nutty. I would be surprised if these kids can really execute successfully on that many school applications. Plus there are cases where top students run the table on all the top schools making it harder for everyone else. Sidwell does seem to have joined the private school-to-uchicago thing quite effectively as have some NY private schools. Beyond that, there are a lot of hooked kids in all these private schools for the Ivy League in particular. So I, at least, take the whole thing w a degree of humility. I certainly wouldn’t have picked another school for my kids based on this.

Oooh, is that why WIS sends so many to UChicago? That was one of the things that surprised me on their matriculation list. I expected more of an international spread (with, of course, the usual Ivies and top American schools), but UChicago showed up a lot. I had no idea it was "a thing".

WIS does not send that many kids to UChicago. Maybe 1 per year.

According to their school profile, they sent 15 in the past 3 years... I would say that is enough to surprise me

https://washingtonintl.static.amais.com/WIS_Profile_Fall25_update-2550.pdf?version=638935447193530000

[Anonymous]

A lot of WIS students have parents at the World Bank and IMF, who will obviously encourage their kids to consider UChicago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a GDS parent. We’re just getting underway re this. While I don’t love the cap, it has logic. Kids we know at other schools are applying to 18-22 colleges. That seems pretty nutty. I would be surprised if these kids can really execute successfully on that many school applications. Plus there are cases where top students run the table on all the top schools making it harder for everyone else. Sidwell does seem to have joined the private school-to-uchicago thing quite effectively as have some NY private schools. Beyond that, there are a lot of hooked kids in all these private schools for the Ivy League in particular. So I, at least, take the whole thing w a degree of humility. I certainly wouldn’t have picked another school for my kids based on this.

Oooh, is that why WIS sends so many to UChicago? That was one of the things that surprised me on their matriculation list. I expected more of an international spread (with, of course, the usual Ivies and top American schools), but UChicago showed up a lot. I had no idea it was "a thing".

WIS does not send that many kids to UChicago. Maybe 1 per year.

According to their school profile, they sent 15 in the past 3 years... I would say that is enough to surprise me

It’s 4 years, not 3.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What were the college placements at NCS?

Holton and NCS are pretty much the same — mix of Ivies, Ivy+, and hard to get into state schools like Michigan.

Stone Ridge is right behind but not quite as many top schools.

As a parent at one of the above schools I can say Sidwell did better than all three of the girls’ schools. Really impressive.

NCS is much much better than Holton this year. Definitely not the same. I see 1 Ivy or Ivy+ admit at Holton in the RD round. The rest is state schools or third tier

This year, Holton has about 20 percent of the class going to Ivy+ schools and about 35 percent to top 20 schools (Ivy+, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, UMichigan and WashU)

There are girls going to Yale, Princeton, Duke, UChicago, Cornell, UPenn who haven’t posted their results yet.

How do you know? 20% going to Ivy? Based on the 70+ students who posted in IG I do not see this. What is Ivy+? U Chicago?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A lot of WIS students have parents at the World Bank and IMF, who will obviously encourage their kids to consider UChicago.

Oh I thought the PP was implying there was some sort of new private school push to go to UChicago, that makes sense too if there is a relationship between UChicago and World Bank & IMF.

I don't know much about UChicago, it just popped put of me because of the number.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:IDK if people know this, but GDS limits the amount of colleges you're allowed to apply to at 12, and 5 of them have to be "safety/foundational" schools if you hit the max. This means that people really think about where they want to apply to and if they like the school! I don't know a single person at GDS that's upset with where they're going to college and I feel like that's all that really matters

-GDS senior

GDS’ college application cap is one of the reasons we turned it down, after my son was admitted (there were other reasons as well). It’s a stupid rule, and none of the administrators could offer a reasonable explanation. My son is a junior at Sidwell now, and he can’t even think of 2 safety schools he wants to attend/are good fits for what he’s looking for in a college. I’m baffled why anyone would need to apply to more than 2-3 safeties—they’re called safeties for a reason.

I wouldn't be on such a high horse if my son were a junior at Sidwell right now. That grade (class of '27) is known for rampant cheating and misbehavior. The Science department has been left traumatized. I'm sure the college outcomes at Sidwell will dip next year because of how many kids were sent to the Honor Committee or reported to the school for cheating on assessments.

There’s no high horse here. I don’t have a problem acknowledging the good and the bad at Sidwell. Rampant cheating in my son’s grade has definitely been an issue (and not just in the science department). Thankfully, my son doesn’t cheat and he’s never been called before the Honor Committee. That said, let’s return to the topic at hand: GDS’ 2026 college results generally, and the application cap specifically. The point I was trying to make is that I think GDS’ application cap (which includes a 5 safety school minimum) is doing a disservice to students. They should raise the cap to at least 15, and reduce the safety requirement to 2-3 schools.

The cap has changed over the years, but currently it's up to 7 non-safety schools ("Reach" and "Target") and 3 to 5 safeties ("Foundation"). I'd prefer the non-safety cap be 8 or 9, but not sure if more beyond that is truly helpful. We'll see.

But isn’t safety is differnt for everyone? If some student is super good, then Dartmouth or Michigan could be a safety?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:IDK if people know this, but GDS limits the amount of colleges you're allowed to apply to at 12, and 5 of them have to be "safety/foundational" schools if you hit the max. This means that people really think about where they want to apply to and if they like the school! I don't know a single person at GDS that's upset with where they're going to college and I feel like that's all that really matters


-GDS senior

GDS’ college application cap is one of the reasons we turned it down, after my son was admitted (there were other reasons as well). It’s a stupid rule, and none of the administrators could offer a reasonable explanation. My son is a junior at Sidwell now, and he can’t even think of 2 safety schools he wants to attend/are good fits for what he’s looking for in a college. I’m baffled why anyone would need to apply to more than 2-3 safeties—they’re called safeties for a reason.

I wouldn't be on such a high horse if my son were a junior at Sidwell right now. That grade (class of '27) is known for rampant cheating and misbehavior. The Science department has been left traumatized. I'm sure the college outcomes at Sidwell will dip next year because of how many kids were sent to the Honor Committee or reported to the school for cheating on assessments.

There’s no high horse here. I don’t have a problem acknowledging the good and the bad at Sidwell. Rampant cheating in my son’s grade has definitely been an issue (and not just in the science department). Thankfully, my son doesn’t cheat and he’s never been called before the Honor Committee. That said, let’s return to the topic at hand: GDS’ 2026 college results generally, and the application cap specifically. The point I was trying to make is that I think GDS’ application cap (which includes a 5 safety school minimum) is doing a disservice to students. They should raise the cap to at least 15, and reduce the safety requirement to 2-3 schools.

The cap has changed over the years, but currently it's up to 7 non-safety schools ("Reach" and "Target") and 3 to 5 safeties ("Foundation"). I'd prefer the non-safety cap be 8 or 9, but not sure if more beyond that is truly helpful. We'll see.

But isn’t safety is differnt for everyone? If some student is super good, then Dartmouth or Michigan could be a safety?

Yup! I think it is to get the kids to think in terms of framing...cause there is no line

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:IDK if people know this, but GDS limits the amount of colleges you're allowed to apply to at 12, and 5 of them have to be "safety/foundational" schools if you hit the max. This means that people really think about where they want to apply to and if they like the school! I don't know a single person at GDS that's upset with where they're going to college and I feel like that's all that really matters


-GDS senior

GDS’ college application cap is one of the reasons we turned it down, after my son was admitted (there were other reasons as well). It’s a stupid rule, and none of the administrators could offer a reasonable explanation. My son is a junior at Sidwell now, and he can’t even think of 2 safety schools he wants to attend/are good fits for what he’s looking for in a college. I’m baffled why anyone would need to apply to more than 2-3 safeties—they’re called safeties for a reason.

I wouldn't be on such a high horse if my son were a junior at Sidwell right now. That grade (class of '27) is known for rampant cheating and misbehavior. The Science department has been left traumatized. I'm sure the college outcomes at Sidwell will dip next year because of how many kids were sent to the Honor Committee or reported to the school for cheating on assessments.

There’s no high horse here. I don’t have a problem acknowledging the good and the bad at Sidwell. Rampant cheating in my son’s grade has definitely been an issue (and not just in the science department). Thankfully, my son doesn’t cheat and he’s never been called before the Honor Committee. That said, let’s return to the topic at hand: GDS’ 2026 college results generally, and the application cap specifically. The point I was trying to make is that I think GDS’ application cap (which includes a 5 safety school minimum) is doing a disservice to students. They should raise the cap to at least 15, and reduce the safety requirement to 2-3 schools.

The cap has changed over the years, but currently it's up to 7 non-safety schools ("Reach" and "Target") and 3 to 5 safeties ("Foundation"). I'd prefer the non-safety cap be 8 or 9, but not sure if more beyond that is truly helpful. We'll see.

But isn’t safety is differnt for everyone? If some student is super good, then Dartmouth or Michigan could be a safety?

Yup! I think it is to get the kids to think in terms of framing...cause there is no line

You are probably not very close to this process if you think that Dartmouth or Michigan are a safety for anyone. I think generally they are considered schools with a over 40% admit rate or at least 30%. It's not 1990

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:IDK if people know this, but GDS limits the amount of colleges you're allowed to apply to at 12, and 5 of them have to be "safety/foundational" schools if you hit the max. This means that people really think about where they want to apply to and if they like the school! I don't know a single person at GDS that's upset with where they're going to college and I feel like that's all that really matters


-GDS senior

GDS’ college application cap is one of the reasons we turned it down, after my son was admitted (there were other reasons as well). It’s a stupid rule, and none of the administrators could offer a reasonable explanation. My son is a junior at Sidwell now, and he can’t even think of 2 safety schools he wants to attend/are good fits for what he’s looking for in a college. I’m baffled why anyone would need to apply to more than 2-3 safeties—they’re called safeties for a reason.

I wouldn't be on such a high horse if my son were a junior at Sidwell right now. That grade (class of '27) is known for rampant cheating and misbehavior. The Science department has been left traumatized. I'm sure the college outcomes at Sidwell will dip next year because of how many kids were sent to the Honor Committee or reported to the school for cheating on assessments.

There’s no high horse here. I don’t have a problem acknowledging the good and the bad at Sidwell. Rampant cheating in my son’s grade has definitely been an issue (and not just in the science department). Thankfully, my son doesn’t cheat and he’s never been called before the Honor Committee. That said, let’s return to the topic at hand: GDS’ 2026 college results generally, and the application cap specifically. The point I was trying to make is that I think GDS’ application cap (which includes a 5 safety school minimum) is doing a disservice to students. They should raise the cap to at least 15, and reduce the safety requirement to 2-3 schools.

The cap has changed over the years, but currently it's up to 7 non-safety schools ("Reach" and "Target") and 3 to 5 safeties ("Foundation"). I'd prefer the non-safety cap be 8 or 9, but not sure if more beyond that is truly helpful. We'll see.

But isn’t safety is differnt for everyone? If some student is super good, then Dartmouth or Michigan could be a safety?

Yup! I think it is to get the kids to think in terms of framing...cause there is no line

You are probably not very close to this process if you think that Dartmouth or Michigan are a safety for anyone. I think generally they are considered schools with a over 40% admit rate or at least 30%. It's not 1990

If your dad went to Dartmouth, but your aiming for Harvard, it could be a safety

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:IDK if people know this, but GDS limits the amount of colleges you're allowed to apply to at 12, and 5 of them have to be "safety/foundational" schools if you hit the max. This means that people really think about where they want to apply to and if they like the school! I don't know a single person at GDS that's upset with where they're going to college and I feel like that's all that really matters


-GDS senior

GDS’ college application cap is one of the reasons we turned it down, after my son was admitted (there were other reasons as well). It’s a stupid rule, and none of the administrators could offer a reasonable explanation. My son is a junior at Sidwell now, and he can’t even think of 2 safety schools he wants to attend/are good fits for what he’s looking for in a college. I’m baffled why anyone would need to apply to more than 2-3 safeties—they’re called safeties for a reason.

I wouldn't be on such a high horse if my son were a junior at Sidwell right now. That grade (class of '27) is known for rampant cheating and misbehavior. The Science department has been left traumatized. I'm sure the college outcomes at Sidwell will dip next year because of how many kids were sent to the Honor Committee or reported to the school for cheating on assessments.

There’s no high horse here. I don’t have a problem acknowledging the good and the bad at Sidwell. Rampant cheating in my son’s grade has definitely been an issue (and not just in the science department). Thankfully, my son doesn’t cheat and he’s never been called before the Honor Committee. That said, let’s return to the topic at hand: GDS’ 2026 college results generally, and the application cap specifically. The point I was trying to make is that I think GDS’ application cap (which includes a 5 safety school minimum) is doing a disservice to students. They should raise the cap to at least 15, and reduce the safety requirement to 2-3 schools.

The cap has changed over the years, but currently it's up to 7 non-safety schools ("Reach" and "Target") and 3 to 5 safeties ("Foundation"). I'd prefer the non-safety cap be 8 or 9, but not sure if more beyond that is truly helpful. We'll see.

But isn’t safety is differnt for everyone? If some student is super good, then Dartmouth or Michigan could be a safety?

Yup! I think it is to get the kids to think in terms of framing...cause there is no line

You are probably not very close to this process if you think that Dartmouth or Michigan are a safety for anyone. I think generally they are considered schools with a over 40% admit rate or at least 30%. It's not 1990

For the GDS process, they have stated that any school under 20% cannot be considered a "safety". Doesn't matter how competitive you are, it can't be a foundational school. Everything above that can be considered a target or safety, depending on your stats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of WIS students have parents at the World Bank and IMF, who will obviously encourage their kids to consider UChicago.

Oh I thought the PP was implying there was some sort of new private school push to go to UChicago, that makes sense too if there is a relationship between UChicago and World Bank & IMF.

I don't know much about UChicago, it just popped put of me because of the number.

I am the pp and yes I was implying that there is a rigorous private school connection to UChicago. UChicago loves these kids as they tend to be full pay (chicago having some financial issues) and they are well prepared for the academics. There are some private schools that send a lot - including St. Albans and Sidwell. Horace Mann in NY - a national top private - sends about 20 a year out of a class of 150 or so.

It's often the kids who don't get have connections/legacy into other top schools or sometimes after they get deferred from their ED1 at an Ivy. It's a great school, but it's not random that 15 kids are going from sidwell this year - or the 20 from Horace Mann.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A lot of WIS students have parents at the World Bank and IMF, who will obviously encourage their kids to consider UChicago.

Oh I thought the PP was implying there was some sort of new private school push to go to UChicago, that makes sense too if there is a relationship between UChicago and World Bank & IMF.

I don't know much about UChicago, it just popped put of me because of the number.

Haha I was just making a fun conjecture because UChicago is the birthplace of most economic theory, and the Bank and IMF are hubs of economists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like getting into ivies is more about rich and powerful families than about which school you attend

This is shocking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What were the college placements at NCS?

Holton and NCS are pretty much the same — mix of Ivies, Ivy+, and hard to get into state schools like Michigan.

Stone Ridge is right behind but not quite as many top schools.

As a parent at one of the above schools I can say Sidwell did better than all three of the girls’ schools. Really impressive.

NCS is much much better than Holton this year. Definitely not the same. I see 1 Ivy or Ivy+ admit at Holton in the RD round. The rest is state schools or third tier

This year, Holton has about 20 percent of the class going to Ivy+ schools and about 35 percent to top 20 schools (Ivy+, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, UMichigan and WashU)

There are girls going to Yale, Princeton, Duke, UChicago, Cornell, UPenn who haven’t posted their results yet.

How do you know? 20% going to Ivy? Based on the 70+ students who posted in IG I do not see this. What is Ivy+? U Chicago?

Ivy+: the Ivy League schools plus Stanford, MIT, UChicago, Duke, and sometimes Johns Hopkins.