NVSL Athlete Eligibility

[Anonymous]

NVSL provides some money that the pool then uses to purchase things do the event. The money making really comes from concessions. That’s why the past two years have netted such low profits for pools- they got stormed out. This year the plan is to start ASR first thing in the morning, which allows more time for delays. Because of this, the host pool should be able to make a lot more money. In the past it’s been around $8-10,000. This new fee would be money on top of that.

[Anonymous]

Pinecrest here - the league gives "seed" money of 10k to the host pool. That is in theory, only supposed to cover the additional necessities of hosting: porta potties, police for traffic assistance, officials luncheon, etc.... Those necessities usually take the entire 10k. Concessions if done well is where teams can make their money. We were fortunate enough to get the porta potties donated, so that allowed us to keep a significant portion of the 10k. With concessions and other sponsorships on top of that, we were able to clear 12-15k each year.
Just food for thought if anyone else is thinking of hosting. We were not the perfect pool, but we did our best.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pinecrest here - the league gives "seed" money of 10k to the host pool. That is in theory, only supposed to cover the additional necessities of hosting: porta potties, police for traffic assistance, officials luncheon, etc.... Those necessities usually take the entire 10k. Concessions if done well is where teams can make their money. We were fortunate enough to get the porta potties donated, so that allowed us to keep a significant portion of the 10k. With concessions and other sponsorships on top of that, we were able to clear 12-15k each year.
Just food for thought if anyone else is thinking of hosting. We were not the perfect pool, but we did our best.

You guys were a great host, thank you!

[Anonymous]

Pinecrest was awesome, thank you for stepping up to host!

[Anonymous]

Why don’t we force teams who send the most swimmers, to host??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pinecrest here - the league gives "seed" money of 10k to the host pool. That is in theory, only supposed to cover the additional necessities of hosting: porta potties, police for traffic assistance, officials luncheon, etc.... Those necessities usually take the entire 10k. Concessions if done well is where teams can make their money. We were fortunate enough to get the porta potties donated, so that allowed us to keep a significant portion of the 10k. With concessions and other sponsorships on top of that, we were able to clear 12-15k each year.
Just food for thought if anyone else is thinking of hosting. We were not the perfect pool, but we did our best.

That amount would be a helpful boon for our club.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t we force teams who send the most swimmers, to host??

Logistics, it's only a week between Divisional relays and Allstar relay carnival. Plus, swim team does not own the pool (members do) to do whatever they want.

[Anonymous]

I don't have strong feelings about ASR or IAS. I do think there's case for making both 14U as a way to reduce the logistical burden and length of the meets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't have strong feelings about ASR or IAS. I do think there's case for making both 14U as a way to reduce the logistical burden and length of the meets.

That would be a great idea, especially for IAS. The teenagers have raced or HS and club season. They don't need to do it again (and the fastest scratch anyhow)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t we force teams who send the most swimmers, to host??

Those are the D1 pools and they will all swear that just don't have the ability due to blah blah. Chesterbrook could do it, but there is a parking issue there. OKM could probably do it. But I would say D1-D3 pools should all be stepping up. They send the most swimmers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't have strong feelings about ASR or IAS. I do think there's case for making both 14U as a way to reduce the logistical burden and length of the meets.

Honestly that is a great idea and something the league should consider. The fast HS kids skip divisionals/IAS anyways. It shows when you pull the fastest kids each year and then compare it to the fastest kids from IAS. They are not the fastest because they are at other meets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't have strong feelings about ASR or IAS. I do think there's case for making both 14U as a way to reduce the logistical burden and length of the meets.

For ASR I would say keep the big kids for the mixed age relay and it is in the middle of the season. I do think it is a good idea for IAS - the fast kids are already skipping this meet in the 15-18 group.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t we force teams who send the most swimmers, to host??

Those are the D1 pools and they will all swear that just don't have the ability due to blah blah. Chesterbrook could do it, but there is a parking issue there. OKM could probably do it. But I would say D1-D3 pools should all be stepping up. They send the most swimmers.

OKM pool is slightly the wrong length. They can't host this type of meet. It does seem like Chesterbrook could do it, ideally st dunstan's would let them use parking lot, and they could also use chesterbrook elementary school for overflow.

In D2- Crosspointe could host. Wakefield Chapel probably could too. Vienna Aquatic probably could- using ideally Vienna Baptist church and Marshall Road elementary as overflow.

In D3- Little hunting park could host. Hunt Valley probably could too.

I don't really think any of the other D3 pools could host a league wide meet.

I don't really think, however, that any of these pools are particularly strapped for cash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t we force teams who send the most swimmers, to host??

Those are the D1 pools and they will all swear that just don't have the ability due to blah blah. Chesterbrook could do it, but there is a parking issue there. OKM could probably do it. But I would say D1-D3 pools should all be stepping up. They send the most swimmers.

OKM pool is slightly the wrong length. They can't host this type of meet. It does seem like Chesterbrook could do it, ideally st dunstan's would let them use parking lot, and they could also use chesterbrook elementary school for overflow.

In D2- Crosspointe could host. Wakefield Chapel probably could too. Vienna Aquatic probably could- using ideally Vienna Baptist church and Marshall Road elementary as overflow.

In D3- Little hunting park could host. Hunt Valley probably could too.

I don't really think any of the other D3 pools could host a league wide meet.

I don't really think, however, that any of these pools are particularly strapped for cash.

Maybe the thought that they won't have it will make them finally step up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't have strong feelings about ASR or IAS. I do think there's case for making both 14U as a way to reduce the logistical burden and length of the meets.

Honestly that is a great idea and something the league should consider. The fast HS kids skip divisionals/IAS anyways. It shows when you pull the fastest kids each year and then compare it to the fastest kids from IAS. They are not the fastest because they are at other meets.

Not true across the board. There are still some very fast swimmers who attend both. Please don’t suggest this, it’s not within the spirit of summer league.