New W-L Principal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:While I too would like some hot tea, this line of thinking that somehow this is union busting - seems a bit conspiracy-theory-ish.

1.) Very few teachers and staff, by percentage actually belong to the AEA. While they are doing some good things for teachers in general, they are a loud minority and take up a lot of space. They listen to their group, not necessarily to other teacher concerns outside of their circle.

2.) The rumor is that Hall left because of health issues. I do not know him personally, but multiple people at W-L have told me this.

3.) I agree that it would have been preferable to keep Willmore for continuity. Maybe Duncan just aced his interview with Duran. Who knows. All of this speculation is kind of ridiculous.

Duncan is patently less qualified than Willmore, doesn’t have experience with APS, and shows a willingness to job hop (he is leaving ACHS after just 3 years after all).

Just because he INTERVIEWED well? They bonded over equity initiatives? I fear Durans roots as an equity officer are still showing; rather than addressing the broader student bodies needs, he is obsessed with closing the testing gaps, even if it means with lowering the top.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What the hell are all of you complaining about? By every indication Washington liberty is a high performing school. It has a very diverse population. The new principal is experienced in dealing with both. What the hell do you people want? Why aren’t you willing to even give the guy a chance? You’re just a bunch of overinvolved weirdos.

I’m the DCPS parent who posted above. I totally agree with you that there is a subset of parents who will be aggrieved at anything they feel they were not personally consulted about, and are unreasonably triggered by the notion of having to share resources with different types of people. But … it is still true that W-L has a college bound cohort who deserve to be seen as legitimate stakeholders and not just “rich white kids who will be fine no matter what.” And while Duncan’s record on disciple seems promising (just based on what the ACPS parent wrote here) I also am wary of the very very bad “woke”” educational trends that eviscerate academics, like getting rid of honors programs and “tracking,” endless redos, no or little homework, and failure to focus on content. So yeah, I would be more comfortable if he had a background in some kind of college prep program environment.

There would be a revolt in the community if the new leadership proposed undermining W-L’s academic legacy in any way, by lowering the bar so to speak.

For generations, the school has set high expectations across the board, and has been recognized for its academics by the U.S. Dept of Education, and the Ladies Home Journal way back in my grandparents’ generation.

To the DCPS poster I wouldn’t say W-L is uniquely diverse, as some have said, but the diversity it does have provides a healthy dose different perspectives. It is mostly white and affluent, reflecting the immediately surrounding neighborhoods, but has students from all walks of life. It is more diverse than Yorktown, which is uniquely not diverse in the context of the DC region, where public schools are quite diverse.

As you already know, both schools are good though, and your family should be fine at either.

It is actually not mostly white. It’s a majority minority. It’s 42% white, 33% Hispanic, 9% Asian and 8 percent black. It’s 24% economically disadvantaged. Yorktown is 61% white and 12% economically disadvantaged.

WL is mostly white. That’s the largest subgroup, hence “mostly”. There are very few if any majority white high schools in Northern Va, namely Yorktown and Madison.

That said, the school has the diversity lacking in most other close-in, affluent school districts, outside of Phila or Boston, etc. many of those schools are still 80-plus percent white.

Wow Yorktown is only 61% white?! More diverse than I thought.

Yorktown would probably be about 55% white, but the 2018 boundary changes moved a number of W-L neighborhoods to Yorktown. Still, W-L has more white students than most Northern Virginia high schools.

We all live in one of the most multi-culturally diverse areas in the country, and Yorktown is the outlier, not the norm. W-L more closely resembles the current norm, while skewing more white and affluent.

That said, DCPS poster would probably be happy at any of the APS high schools. Yorktown does have more of a country club culture than W-L. Perhaps the DCPS poster seeks to avoid the Upper NW country club scene at Wilson/Jackson-Reed and any perceived/real DCPS dysfunction?

The newly appointed W-L principal appears to be okay, after the initial surprise. He hasn’t stood out in a bad or good way in his current job. Maybe he’s looking for a more stable high school environment and a long term gig. (I assume any principal at ACHS would have more challenges than one at a smaller high school located on one campus.) APS high school principals do tend to stay at their schools for 10-plus years on average so I hope he develops strong relationships with the staff and families. Past W-L principals have been generally well-liked and respected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I too would like some hot tea, this line of thinking that somehow this is union busting - seems a bit conspiracy-theory-ish.

1.) Very few teachers and staff, by percentage actually belong to the AEA. While they are doing some good things for teachers in general, they are a loud minority and take up a lot of space. They listen to their group, not necessarily to other teacher concerns outside of their circle.

2.) The rumor is that Hall left because of health issues. I do not know him personally, but multiple people at W-L have told me this.

3.) I agree that it would have been preferable to keep Willmore for continuity. Maybe Duncan just aced his interview with Duran. Who knows. All of this speculation is kind of ridiculous.

Duncan is patently less qualified than Willmore, doesn’t have experience with APS, and shows a willingness to job hop (he is leaving ACHS after just 3 years after all).

Just because he INTERVIEWED well? They bonded over equity initiatives? I fear Durans roots as an equity officer are still showing; rather than addressing the broader student bodies needs, he is obsessed with closing the testing gaps, even if it means with lowering the top.

OP again. My point is that we will NEVER know why Duncan was picked over Willmore. While we're wildly speculating, maybe Willmore was offered the job first and declined, choosing the MS administrator role instead. Who the F knows? We won't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I too would like some hot tea, this line of thinking that somehow this is union busting - seems a bit conspiracy-theory-ish.

1.) Very few teachers and staff, by percentage actually belong to the AEA. While they are doing some good things for teachers in general, they are a loud minority and take up a lot of space. They listen to their group, not necessarily to other teacher concerns outside of their circle.

2.) The rumor is that Hall left because of health issues. I do not know him personally, but multiple people at W-L have told me this.

3.) I agree that it would have been preferable to keep Willmore for continuity. Maybe Duncan just aced his interview with Duran. Who knows. All of this speculation is kind of ridiculous.

Duncan is patently less qualified than Willmore, doesn’t have experience with APS, and shows a willingness to job hop (he is leaving ACHS after just 3 years after all).

Just because he INTERVIEWED well? They bonded over equity initiatives? I fear Durans roots as an equity officer are still showing; rather than addressing the broader student bodies needs, he is obsessed with closing the testing gaps, even if itmeans with lowering the top.

OP again. My point is that we will NEVER know why Duncan was picked over Willmore. While we're wildly speculating, maybe Willmore was offered the job first and declined, choosing the MS administrator role instead. Who the F knows? We won't.

Well let’s pivot. For someone who is transferring to WL as a IB from Yorktown, what is expected to change? The way he has ambitions to transform and clean house at a successful school worries us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a parent of W-L kids, the academic rigor is great, and the kids in those classes are doing fine and college placement is impressive. I hope that isn't changed. I do think there is a group of kids at the school not getting educated very well, not attending class, threatening teachers, and the school needs to find a better solution to deal with them.

My problem is that I have a kid in the middle of the pack - not an academic superstar who is going to be IB or even shoot for UVA. I worry already about him getting lost in the crowd because he’s not advanced enough to take 17 APs or whatever; but not behind enough to get “equity” resources. He would benefit from a school where the baseline is really high so thay even where he is (“normal” classes) the expectations are appropriate.

I have one kid that fits that description at W-L. He took a couple AP classes, a coupme IB classes and some GenEd. The teachers in the advanced classes went out of their way to bring him along. I have been so impressed. The GenEd teachers were always in touch and helpful too. I understand your concerns but they didn’t play out with my student.

I have that kid, too. He just graduated. I was not thrilled with his education at WL and am glad to be done. The AP and IB classes he took were mostly good. The problem is the large gap between the advanced classes and the regular classes because there is such a divide between the students who take them. There seems to be very little middle ground. He also had a class every year that was not staffed by an actual teacher for part of the year. This especially hurt him in math where he had no geometry teacher for most of the first semester. Last year his physics teacher just up and left in the middle of the year. We got little to no contact from the school about any of it. We did love the school spirit and he made good friends. But in my opinion, if you are a kid in the middle of the pack, you can get a bit lost. Those kids who are motivated and take all upper level classes will do just fine.

This was my experience at my high school in the 1990s. I don't think it's new or special to WL.

+1 that's just public high school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I too would like some hot tea, this line of thinking that somehow this is union busting - seems a bit conspiracy-theory-ish.

1.) Very few teachers and staff, by percentage actually belong to the AEA. While they are doing some good things for teachers in general, they are a loud minority and take up a lot of space. They listen to their group, not necessarily to other teacher concerns outside of their circle.

2.) The rumor is that Hall left because of health issues. I do not know him personally, but multiple people at W-L have told me this.

3.) I agree that it would have been preferable to keep Willmore for continuity. Maybe Duncan just aced his interview with Duran. Who knows. All of this speculation is kind of ridiculous.

Duncan is patently less qualified than Willmore, doesn’t have experience with APS, and shows a willingness to job hop (he is leaving ACHS after just 3 years after all).

Just because he INTERVIEWED well? They bonded over equity initiatives? I fear Durans roots as an equity officer are still showing; rather than addressing the broader student bodies needs, he is obsessed with closing the testing gaps, even if itmeans with lowering the top.

OP again. My point is that we will NEVER know why Duncan was picked over Willmore. While we're wildly speculating, maybe Willmore was offered the job first and declined, choosing the MS administrator role instead. Who the F knows? We won't.

Well let’s pivot. For someone who is transferring to WL as a IB from Yorktown, what is expected to change? The way he has ambitions to transform and clean house at a successful school worries us.

No one can know this. He was announced 2 days ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I too would like some hot tea, this line of thinking that somehow this is union busting - seems a bit conspiracy-theory-ish.

1.) Very few teachers and staff, by percentage actually belong to the AEA. While they are doing some good things for teachers in general, they are a loud minority and take up a lot of space. They listen to their group, not necessarily to other teacher concerns outside of their circle.

2.) The rumor is that Hall left because of health issues. I do not know him personally, but multiple people at W-L have told me this.

3.) I agree that it would have been preferable to keep Willmore for continuity. Maybe Duncan just aced his interview with Duran. Who knows. All of this speculation is kind of ridiculous.

Duncan is patently less qualified than Willmore, doesn’t have experience with APS, and shows a willingness to job hop (he is leaving ACHS after just 3 years after all).

Just because he INTERVIEWED well? They bonded over equity initiatives? I fear Durans roots as an equity officer are still showing; rather than addressing the broader student bodies needs, he is obsessed with closing the testing gaps, even if itmeans with lowering the top.

OP again. My point is that we will NEVER know why Duncan was picked over Willmore. While we're wildly speculating, maybe Willmore was offered the job first and declined, choosing the MS administrator role instead. Who the F knows? We won't.

Well let’s pivot. For someone who is transferring to WL as a IB from Yorktown, what is expected to change? The way he has ambitions to transform and clean house at a successful school worries us.

Now we're in crazy-town. What, with all of this "equity", APS finally turns around standardized W-L EL standardized test scores with Duncan in charge?

My man, let's wait for something to complain about. We don't know what's going to happen. It could be worst of times, or the best.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What the hell are all of you complaining about? By every indication Washington liberty is a high performing school. It has a very diverse population. The new principal is experienced in dealing with both. What the hell do you people want? Why aren’t you willing to even give the guy a chance? You’re just a bunch of overinvolved weirdos.

I’m the DCPS parent who posted above. I totally agree with you that there is a subset of parents who will be aggrieved at anything they feel they were not personally consulted about, and are unreasonably triggered by the notion of having to share resources with different types of people. But … it is still true that W-L has a college bound cohort who deserve to be seen as legitimate stakeholders and not just “rich white kids who will be fine no matter what.” And while Duncan’s record on disciple seems promising (just based on what the ACPS parent wrote here) I also am wary of the very very bad “woke”” educational trends that eviscerate academics, like getting rid of honors programs and “tracking,” endless redos, no or little homework, and failure to focus on content. So yeah, I would be more comfortable if he had a background in some kind of college prep program environment.

There would be a revolt in the community if the new leadership proposed undermining W-L’s academic legacy in any way, by lowering the bar so to speak.

For generations, the school has set high expectations across the board, and has been recognized for its academics by the U.S. Dept of Education, and the Ladies Home Journal way back in my grandparents’ generation.

To the DCPS poster I wouldn’t say W-L is uniquely diverse, as some have said, but the diversity it does have provides a healthy dose different perspectives. It is mostly white and affluent, reflecting the immediately surrounding neighborhoods, but has students from all walks of life. It is more diverse than Yorktown, which is uniquely not diverse in the context of the DC region, where public schools are quite diverse.

As you already know, both schools are good though, and your family should be fine at either.

It is actually not mostly white. It’s a majority minority. It’s 42% white, 33% Hispanic, 9% Asian and 8 percent black. It’s 24% economically disadvantaged. Yorktown is 61% white and 12% economically disadvantaged.

WL is mostly white. That’s the largest subgroup, hence “mostly”. There are very few if any majority white high schools in Northern Va, namely Yorktown and Madison.

That said, the school has the diversity lacking in most other close-in, affluent school districts, outside of Phila or Boston, etc. many of those schools are still 80-plus percent white.

Wow Yorktown is only 61% white?! More diverse than I thought.

Yorktown would probably be about 55% white, but the 2018 boundary changes moved a number of W-L neighborhoods to Yorktown. Still, W-L has more white students than most Northern Virginia high schools.

We all live in one of the most multi-culturally diverse areas in the country, and Yorktown is the outlier, not the norm. W-L more closely resembles the current norm, while skewing more white and affluent.

That said, DCPS poster would probably be happy at any of the APS high schools. Yorktown does have more of a country club culture than W-L. Perhaps the DCPS poster seeks to avoid the Upper NW country club scene at Wilson/Jackson-Reed and any perceived/real DCPS dysfunction?

The newly appointed W-L principal appears to be okay, after the initial surprise. He hasn’t stood out in a bad or good way in his current job. Maybe he’s looking for a more stable high school environment and a long term gig. (I assume any principal at ACHS would have more challenges than one at a smaller high school located on one campus.) APS high school principals do tend to stay at their schools for 10-plus years on average so I hope he develops strong relationships with the staff and families. Past W-L principals have been generally well-liked and respected.

Hi I am DCPS poster! I would like to stay in DC but I will be renting an apartment and the rental situation is better at W-L. I also like Ballston better than the neighborhoods around J-R in some respects. But the big deciding factor is access to state colleges especially since it looks like DC TAG (the program that gives DC kids $10k/year for college) may go away.

I also am considering BCC and Blair. But I really just kinda like Ballston/Clarendon better. It grew on me!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What the hell are all of you complaining about? By every indication Washington liberty is a high performing school. It has a very diverse population. The new principal is experienced in dealing with both. What the hell do you people want? Why aren’t you willing to even give the guy a chance? You’re just a bunch of overinvolved weirdos.

I’m the DCPS parent who posted above. I totally agree with you that there is a subset of parents who will be aggrieved at anything they feel they were not personally consulted about, and are unreasonably triggered by the notion of having to share resources with different types of people. But … it is still true that W-L has a college bound cohort who deserve to be seen as legitimate stakeholders and not just “rich white kids who will be fine no matter what.” And while Duncan’s record on disciple seems promising (just based on what the ACPS parent wrote here) I also am wary of the very very bad “woke”” educational trends that eviscerate academics, like getting rid of honors programs and “tracking,” endless redos, no or little homework, and failure to focus on content. So yeah, I would be more comfortable if he had a background in some kind of college prep program environment.

There would be a revolt in the community if the new leadership proposed undermining W-L’s academic legacy in any way, by lowering the bar so to speak.

For generations, the school has set high expectations across the board, and has been recognized for its academics by the U.S. Dept of Education, and the Ladies Home Journal way back in my grandparents’ generation.

To the DCPS poster I wouldn’t say W-L is uniquely diverse, as some have said, but the diversity it does have provides a healthy dose different perspectives. It is mostly white and affluent, reflecting the immediately surrounding neighborhoods, but has students from all walks of life. It is more diverse than Yorktown, which is uniquely not diverse in the context of the DC region, where public schools are quite diverse.

As you already know, both schools are good though, and your family should be fine at either.

It is actually not mostly white. It’s a majority minority. It’s 42% white, 33% Hispanic, 9% Asian and 8 percent black. It’s 24% economically disadvantaged. Yorktown is 61% white and 12% economically disadvantaged.

WL is mostly white. That’s the largest subgroup, hence “mostly”. There are very few if any majority white high schools in Northern Va, namely Yorktown and Madison.

That said, the school has the diversity lacking in most other close-in, affluent school districts, outside of Phila or Boston, etc. many of those schools are still 80-plus percent white.

Wow Yorktown is only 61% white?! More diverse than I thought.

Yorktown would probably be about 55% white, but the 2018 boundary changes moved a number of W-L neighborhoods to Yorktown. Still, W-L has more white students than most Northern Virginia high schools.

We all live in one of the most multi-culturally diverse areas in the country, and Yorktown is the outlier, not the norm. W-L more closely resembles the current norm, while skewing more white and affluent.

That said, DCPS poster would probably be happy at any of the APS high schools. Yorktown does have more of a country club culture than W-L. Perhaps the DCPS poster seeks to avoid the Upper NW country club scene at Wilson/Jackson-Reed and any perceived/real DCPS dysfunction?

The newly appointed W-L principal appears to be okay, after the initial surprise. He hasn’t stood out in a bad or good way in his current job. Maybe he’s looking for a more stable high school environment and a long term gig. (I assume any principal at ACHS would have more challenges than one at a smaller high school located on one campus.) APS high school principals do tend to stay at their schools for 10-plus years on average so I hope he develops strong relationships with the staff and families. Past W-L principals have been generally well-liked and respected.

Hi I am DCPS poster! I would like to stay in DC but I will be renting an apartment and the rental situation is better at W-L. I also like Ballston better than the neighborhoods around J-R in some respects. But the big deciding factor is access to state colleges especially since it looks like DC TAG (the program that gives DC kids $10k/year for college) may go away.

I also am considering BCC and Blair. But I really just kinda like Ballston/Clarendon better. It grew on me!

What’s uniquely special about W-L in this sprawling DC region, is that many students can safely walk to school for elementary, middle and high school. The renovated, historic Dorothy Hamm Middle School is just down the street under a mile away. That walkability has helped to create a unique sense of community.

Yorktown and its middle and elementary schools are similarly walkable, but not from the more urban areas—those students are bussed to Yorktown.

I have a connection to Bethesda, and B-CC is uniquely walkable, but not the middle schools—nearby Leland Junior High School was shortsightedly demolished in the 1980s. Both B-CC and W-L are really old schools with fascinating legacies and famous alumni. They are both roughly 100 years old.

You’re probably only looking at high school options, but I thought you might find this context interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What the hell are all of you complaining about? By every indication Washington liberty is a high performing school. It has a very diverse population. The new principal is experienced in dealing with both. What the hell do you people want? Why aren’t you willing to even give the guy a chance? You’re just a bunch of overinvolved weirdos.

I’m the DCPS parent who posted above. I totally agree with you that there is a subset of parents who will be aggrieved at anything they feel they were not personally consulted about, and are unreasonably triggered by the notion of having to share resources with different types of people. But … it is still true that W-L has a college bound cohort who deserve to be seen as legitimate stakeholders and not just “rich white kids who will be fine no matter what.” And while Duncan’s record on disciple seems promising (just based on what the ACPS parent wrote here) I also am wary of the very very bad “woke”” educational trends that eviscerate academics, like getting rid of honors programs and “tracking,” endless redos, no or little homework, and failure to focus on content. So yeah, I would be more comfortable if he had a background in some kind of college prep program environment.

There would be a revolt in the community if the new leadership proposed undermining W-L’s academic legacy in any way, by lowering the bar so to speak.

For generations, the school has set high expectations across the board, and has been recognized for its academics by the U.S. Dept of Education, and the Ladies Home Journal way back in my grandparents’ generation.

To the DCPS poster I wouldn’t say W-L is uniquely diverse, as some have said, but the diversity it does have provides a healthy dose different perspectives. It is mostly white and affluent, reflecting the immediately surrounding neighborhoods, but has students from all walks of life. It is more diverse than Yorktown, which is uniquely not diverse in the context of the DC region, where public schools are quite diverse.

As you already know, both schools are good though, and your family should be fine at either.

It is actually not mostly white. It’s a majority minority. It’s 42% white, 33% Hispanic, 9% Asian and 8 percent black. It’s 24% economically disadvantaged. Yorktown is 61% white and 12% economically disadvantaged.

WL is mostly white. That’s the largest subgroup, hence “mostly”. There are very few if any majority white high schools in Northern Va, namely Yorktown and Madison.

That said, the school has the diversity lacking in most other close-in, affluent school districts, outside of Phila or Boston, etc. many of those schools are still 80-plus percent white.

Wow Yorktown is only 61% white?! More diverse than I thought.

Yorktown would probably be about 55% white, but the 2018 boundary changes moved a number of W-L neighborhoods to Yorktown. Still, W-L has more white students than most Northern Virginia high schools.

We all live in one of the most multi-culturally diverse areas in the country, and Yorktown is the outlier, not the norm. W-L more closely resembles the current norm, while skewing more white and affluent.

That said, DCPS poster would probably be happy at any of the APS high schools. Yorktown does have more of a country club culture than W-L. Perhaps the DCPS poster seeks to avoid the Upper NW country club scene at Wilson/Jackson-Reed and any perceived/real DCPS dysfunction?

The newly appointed W-L principal appears to be okay, after the initial surprise. He hasn’t stood out in a bad or good way in his current job. Maybe he’s looking for a more stable high school environment and a long term gig. (I assume any principal at ACHS would have more challenges than one at a smaller high school located on one campus.) APS high school principals do tend to stay at their schools for 10-plus years on average so I hope he develops strong relationships with the staff and families. Past W-L principals have been generally well-liked and respected.

Hi I am DCPS poster! I would like to stay in DC but I will be renting an apartment and the rental situation is better at W-L. I also like Ballston better than the neighborhoods around J-R in some respects. But the big deciding factor is access to state colleges especially since it looks like DC TAG (the program that gives DC kids $10k/year for college) may go away.

I also am considering BCC and Blair. But I really just kinda like Ballston/Clarendon better. It grew on me!

What’s uniquely special about W-L in this sprawling DC region, is that many students can safely walk to school for elementary, middle and high school. The renovated, historic Dorothy Hamm Middle School is just down the street under a mile away. That walkability has helped to create a unique sense of community.

Yorktown and its middle and elementary schools are similarly walkable, but not from the more urban areas—those students are bussed to Yorktown.

I have a connection to Bethesda, and B-CC is uniquely walkable, but not the middle schools—nearby Leland Junior High School was shortsightedly demolished in the 1980s. Both B-CC and W-L are really old schools with fascinating legacies and famous alumni. They are both roughly 100 years old.

You’re probably only looking at high school options, but I thought you might find this context interesting.

yes thanks!! Walkability is a huge thing for me and I am looking for that culture for my kid. If I could roll back time I might have just moved to send him to Dorothy Hamm but that ship has sailed.

BCC - I dunno, when it comes down to it, I think I would just enjoy living in Arlington more than Bethesda, but feel free to try to change my mind.

I would have considered the new MacArthur HS in DC, but the city decided to put it in a really inaccessible place. Not many rentals around there and really poor transit options.

[Anonymous]

this happened at YHS too. A committee of staff and other stakeholders was made, a principal was chosen without their recommendation. Granted, YHS didn’t boo and heckle Clark at the school board announcement, but plenty of people were plenty angry. It simmered down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:this happened at YHS too. A committee of staff and other stakeholders was made, a principal was chosen without their recommendation. Granted, YHS didn’t boo and heckle Clark at the school board announcement, but plenty of people were plenty angry. It simmered down

Wait there really was heckling at Duncan??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I too would like some hot tea, this line of thinking that somehow this is union busting - seems a bit conspiracy-theory-ish.

1.) Very few teachers and staff, by percentage actually belong to the AEA. While they are doing some good things for teachers in general, they are a loud minority and take up a lot of space. They listen to their group, not necessarily to other teacher concerns outside of their circle.

2.) The rumor is that Hall left because of health issues. I do not know him personally, but multiple people at W-L have told me this.

3.) I agree that it would have been preferable to keep Willmore for continuity. Maybe Duncan just aced his interview with Duran. Who knows. All of this speculation is kind of ridiculous.

Duncan is patently less qualified than Willmore, doesn’t have experience with APS, and shows a willingness to job hop (he is leaving ACHS after just 3 years after all).

Just because he INTERVIEWED well? They bonded over equity initiatives? I fear Durans roots as an equity officer are still showing; rather than addressing the broader student bodies needs, he is obsessed with closing the testing gaps, even if it means with lowering the top.

I can tell you that is not the case.

OP again. My point is that we will NEVER know why Duncan was picked over Willmore. While we're wildly speculating, maybe Willmore was offered the job first and declined, choosing the MS administrator role instead. Who the F knows? We won't.

[Anonymous]

[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I too would like some hot tea, this line of thinking that somehow this is union busting - seems a bit conspiracy-theory-ish.

1.) Very few teachers and staff, by percentage actually belong to the AEA. While they are doing some good things for teachers in general, they are a loud minority and take up a lot of space. They listen to their group, not necessarily to other teacher concerns outside of their circle.

2.) The rumor is that Hall left because of health issues. I do not know him personally, but multiple people at W-L have told me this.

3.) I agree that it would have been preferable to keep Willmore for continuity. Maybe Duncan just aced his interview with Duran. Who knows. All of this speculation is kind of ridiculous.

Duncan is patently less qualified than Willmore, doesn’t have experience with APS, and shows a willingness to job hop (he is leaving ACHS after just 3 years after all).

Just because he INTERVIEWED well? They bonded over equity initiatives? I fear Durans roots as an equity officer are still showing; rather than addressing the broader student bodies needs, he is obsessed with closing the testing gaps, even if it means with lowering the top.

I can tell you that is not the case.

OP again. My point is that we will NEVER know why Duncan was picked over Willmore. While we're wildly speculating, maybe Willmore was offered the job first and declined, choosing the MS administrator role instead. Who the F knows? We won't.

It’s clear that this is a principle was selected to promote equity. This is not rocket science.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While I too would like some hot tea, this line of thinking that somehow this is union busting - seems a bit conspiracy-theory-ish.

1.) Very few teachers and staff, by percentage actually belong to the AEA. While they are doing some good things for teachers in general, they are a loud minority and take up a lot of space. They listen to their group, not necessarily to other teacher concerns outside of their circle.

2.) The rumor is that Hall left because of health issues. I do not know him personally, but multiple people at W-L have told me this.

3.) I agree that it would have been preferable to keep Willmore for continuity. Maybe Duncan just aced his interview with Duran. Who knows. All of this speculation is kind of ridiculous.

Duncan is patently less qualified than Willmore, doesn’t have experience with APS, and shows a willingness to job hop (he is leaving ACHS after just 3 years after all).

Just because he INTERVIEWED well? They bonded over equity initiatives? I fear Durans roots as an equity officer are still showing; rather than addressing the broader student bodies needs, he is obsessed with closing the testing gaps, even if it means with lowering the top.

I can tell you that is not the case.

OP again. My point is that we will NEVER know why Duncan was picked over Willmore. While we're wildly speculating, maybe Willmore was offered the job first and declined, choosing the MS administrator role instead. Who the F knows? We won't.

It’s clear that this is a principle was selected to promote equity. This is not rocket science.

WL is rated a level one by Virginia, it has the lowest ratings for the achievement app. I.e. it is doing well. That is not something the school need to focus on.