SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat

Anonymous
The Signal use is intentional, to avoid FOIA or discovery or archival laws. Adding the journalist was incompetence.

How many other communications are happening on illegal channels with no national records being kept? This is a crime.
Anonymous
I can't believe that they will not lose their jobs for this.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The Signal use is intentional, to avoid FOIA or discovery or archival laws. Adding the journalist was incompetence.

How many other communications are happening on illegal channels with no national records being kept? This is a crime.


+1
Anonymous
That journalist is better than me. I would’ve stayed in that group chat til 2029 🤡
Anonymous
So who was the “Goldberg” they intended to add to the group? Is there another Jeff Goldberg in this administration?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:So who was the “Goldberg” they intended to add to the group? Is there another Jeff Goldberg in this administration?


Oh does it make it better than they were trying to add someone else with the last name Goldberg on an illegal group chat to plan a war on a commercial platform? Do tell. It’s not like lives were at stake…oh wait…they absolutely were.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


Yeah, we'll see. I doubt it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I can't believe that they will not lose their jobs for this.



Why? Criming is what the administration does best. It’s not like they are even bothering to hide it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


Realize she’s almost certainly talking about prosecuting the journalist. And not the guys who actually planned a bombing via signal in violation of the law and added the journalist by mistake.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The deepest irony of course is that every journalist who has contacted a Republican “off the record” has done so via Signal.

Every journalist with a Hill or executive branch beat knows that Republicans only will chat via Signal and/or in person.

The media has know about their Signal use for years!!!


But not with WAR PLANS!
Anonymous
"But her emails."

On the plus side, these incompetents will let us all know about invasion plans in advance.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Surprised the journalist isn't charged with treason


That's why he left the chat - because if he stayed longer then they probably would.


Why did he take screenshots and not delete it


He did not take screenshots of military information per se. Are you saying he should have kept the entire thing to himself?



The journalist was doing his job.

Unlike the others who are supposed to be following the law and protecting our nation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


sounds like she is pleading guilty
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: