Meta Bend the Knee

[Anonymous]

This is the level of corruption that happens when business gets too "big" - all these companies like Amazon, Meta, etc. - they all can benefit with government looking the other way or with them. That's why they are bowing down to Trump and this is how empires fall.

[Anonymous]

The Zuck memes on Facebook are lit today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Zuck memes on Facebook are lit today.

Not on facebook - could you elaborate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.

Misinformation isn’t speech, a$$wipe.

Yes it is. It absolutely is, because who decides what is misinformation?

I’m old enough to remember when women claimed that the Covid vaccine was messing with their menstruation and it was censored and labeled misinformation.

Turned out to be true!

Cite your sources

DP

My uterus is MY source. After my 2nd Moderna shot in 2021, I skipped two periods, then had short duration periods every 14-16 days, for several months.

That was some scary sh*t.

LOL "scary sht". I can see why no one took you seriously.

All of my children have been born in my 30s and my fertility is extremely important to me. If I was having issues that impacted my fertility, I would be scared too. To be lied to on top of it adds insult to injury. To then have to deal with tremendous a-holes such as yourself - you are part of what’s wrong with modern society. Something is seriously wrong with you. Perhaps you should take a moment to reflect.
-NP

DP. Then maybe PP should've looked closer at her hormones who were very likely the culprit, and not a random vaccine.

The vaccine has been associated with changes in menstrual cycle duration and heavier bleeding.

So has Covid...

But those weren’t the claims dismissed as misinformation at the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's kind of funny watching far left liberals here get bent out of shape because Zuckerberg has decided to embrace free speech.

Free speech used to be valued by liberals.

Free speech is a two-way street. You can say whatever you want, but people are free to challenge what you've said and call it out for bullshit. You don't want "free speech", you want consequence-free speech.

That’s totally fair. But if you want to put in partisan fact checkers that put out false information (i.e., Covid had nothing to do with Wuhan laboratories) or if you want to suppress speech by manipulating your algorithms to silence opposing points of view without disclosure or under government pressure, that’s not practicing the two way street.

[Anonymous]

Trump was banned from all social media. How can anyone justify that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump was banned from all social media. How can anyone justify that?

Justify being banned? They’re private companies. They make the rules for their site and decide the policies and procedures for violations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's kind of funny watching far left liberals here get bent out of shape because Zuckerberg has decided to embrace free speech.

Free speech used to be valued by liberals.

Free speech is a two-way street. You can say whatever you want, but people are free to challenge what you've said and call it out for bullshit. You don't want "free speech", you want consequence-free speech.

That’s totally fair. But if you want to put in partisan fact checkers that put out false information (i.e., Covid had nothing to do with Wuhan laboratories) or if you want to suppress speech by manipulating your algorithms to silence opposing points of view without disclosure or under government pressure, that’s not practicing the two way street.

The refugees of Myanmar applaud you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's kind of funny watching far left liberals here get bent out of shape because Zuckerberg has decided to embrace free speech.

Free speech used to be valued by liberals.

Free speech and yelling FIRE in a movie theatre are different. If you are making up facts ala JD Vance and shouting them on line like Alex Jones you should be censored.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump was banned from all social media. How can anyone justify that?

Remember the attempted coup? That's when he was banned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump was banned from all social media. How can anyone justify that?

Remember the attempted coup? That's when he was banned.

Murderers aren’t banned from social media so why would Trump be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump was banned from all social media. How can anyone justify that?

Remember the attempted coup? That's when he was banned.

Don’t ever claim to be pro democracy when you stifle speech for political retribution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's kind of funny watching far left liberals here get bent out of shape because Zuckerberg has decided to embrace free speech.

Free speech used to be valued by liberals.

Free speech is a two-way street. You can say whatever you want, but people are free to challenge what you've said and call it out for bullshit. You don't want "free speech", you want consequence-free speech.

That’s totally fair. But if you want to put in partisan fact checkers that put out false information (i.e., Covid had nothing to do with Wuhan laboratories) or if you want to suppress speech by manipulating your algorithms to silence opposing points of view without disclosure or under government pressure, that’s not practicing the two way street.

Is this the part where we pretend that Facebook isn't a major vector for inserting intentional disinformation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump was banned from all social media. How can anyone justify that?

Remember the attempted coup? That's when he was banned.

Don’t ever claim to be pro democracy when you stifle speech for political retribution.

Yes, those unlucky tourists were simply voicing an opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump was banned from all social media. How can anyone justify that?

Justify being banned? They’re private companies. They make the rules for their site and decide the policies and procedures for violations.

So what's OP's problem?