I'm not sure it will be that easy. I mean it may go into effect in theory - but there are a lot of things to work out. Offices not big enough for all staff. How to handle fully remote workers. etc etc. |
Yup. This is the level of intelligence we’re working with here. |
Well I don’t have an office (even though I’m local to DC). I have a place where I can go to pick up a new badge or get my computer fixed. But I have to arrange for someone to let me in because I don’t have direct building access and then no one I work with would be there because they’re spread all over. So no I won’t be going into a place that doesn’t exist. |
Is it your bosses job to make you feel comfortable? Plus $67,800 if husband and wife work at chase is $135,600. Plenty of money for a couple with no kids, one used car in a small one bedroom rental. |
![]() Will you be my friend? |
Again. Where are you getting the idea that Chase employees in DC earn $67,800 a year? |
More than a rudimentary knowledge of the way toe federal government works? Please tell us, PP, what legislation is required for the executive branch to impose RTO measures? |
And start . . . what? Passing laws by veto-proof margins regarding whether federal employees can work form home, rather than be required to return to the office? Seriously, some of you are so stupid it's a wonder you can turn your computers on. You do not make a compelling case that the federal workforce is filled with the best and the brightest. |
Someone with so little reading comprehension should avoid throwing around insults like that. |
RTO. That's why it's called "work."
Feds did not agree to lower salaries to WFH. People agreed to accept federal jobs at the pay scale offered. If RTO makes that undesirable, it's same as a company moving it's offices from Tysons to Reston. Some employees are effed and have a new bad commute. They can seek other employers. Downtown DC is empty. Wasn't precovid. |
Good, I do not want them back at their desks, I want their positions eliminated. |
Why? Which positions, specifically, do you want eliminated? |
Why |
Because some people just want to hurt others. They don't care as long as they can claim they "owned the libs". But when their SSA appeal is delayed for months because of insufficient staffing, they'll be screaming. |
I am not a Fed, but I have a serious question…why do you want their positions removed? How f**ked up is your own life that you are salivating at the idea of people losing their livelihood? What difference does it make to you or I as to what is their work location? Frankly, all these comments coming from people wanting Feds in office etc etc are coming from a section of population that is not happy with their lives and the only thing that makes such people happy is seeing others in misery. These are real families, real lives we are discussing here, these Feds are good, productive members of society. Have some empathy and respect for their work or life circumstances. Also, spare me the drivel about waste and abuse in government, if you were serious about government spending then you wouldn’t have voted in a bankrupt billionaire who added 9 trillion to debt just so his 0.1% buddies could get even richer. It’s because of stupid people like you workers are losing protections and work/life balance, you all are too eager to lick the boots of the billionaire class. For what? I can’t figure out. |