Wonderful! |
Yay!! |
You mad, Lynne? Better luck in your next gig. |
lol. Okay. MCPS is going to be able scrutinize the work of an actuary that specializes in healthcare and benefits. There’s a reason you hire a consultant for some things. |
Hiring consultants to do all this is financially a huge waste. MCPS has staff attorneys and financial folks to do it. Enough with the outsourcing. That money needs to go to students. MCPS should make changes to benefits as its not sustainable. |
Attorneys and "financial folks" do not have the expertise neeeded to estimate health care costs. MCPS probably shouldn't self-insure, it would almost certainly cost more to have the insurance companies assume the risk. |
I'm not sure I get your last point. Is it that even though MCPS shouldn't self-insure, that it would be more expensive to do have the insurance companies assume the risk and therefore it's not likely to happen? |
Education financial folk do not have the expertise to fully forecast future insurance cost. And many agree that MCPS has to make changes to the benefits. MCPS has already stated this needs to happen. However they don’t get to do that in a vacuum. They have to negotiate with the union partners and as already been mentioned worry about staff retention. |
They need their attorneys to administer board such as this dcum
|
There should have been a "but" between the clauses. As it stands, MCPS and taxpayers bear the risk and associated cost of underestimating insurance costs. When health care costs go above projections, MCPS needs to make up the difference. If MCPS didn't self insure, then the health insurance provider would take on that risk. But they're going to charge more money on premiums if they do that. |
| So who is not planning to reapply for their position? |
|
Some info about these chief positions, including that Taylor will share more about his vision on Dec. 5th.
https://moco360.media/2024/11/26/mcps-to-reshape-leadership-structure/ |
I am wondering how these executive-level positions are the same number as McKnight had. I am not a big fan of making people reapply for their jobs. If someone isn't doing what you want, show that person the door. Otherwise, making a team of people fear for their jobs by having to reapply for the jobs weakens the moral of the team as well as that of the overall organization. What a dumb move. I'm beginning to wonder whether Taylor is up to the job. |
Agreed. Either get rid of the ones you don’t want or just keep them and change their roles and responsibilities. |
+100. FAANG companies do this and it has the exact effect you speak of. Sure people who are retained move past it enough to keep working but it is certainly a contributing factor in turnover and burnout. |