Playground etiquette: running around with pb&j sandwich

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No they dont. The peer reviewed papers do not state that it reduces risk. Its not even recommended by medical groups.



Are you the same one who posted the link above?


No I am someone who has to constantly make allowances for other kids allergies when literally my kids allergy food is EVERYWHERE and I just got fed up with hearing about how its protective when it is not.

https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/04/07/peanut-free-school-zones-dont-work-11104#:~:text=Do%20they%20work%3F%20No.%20A%20new%20article%20published,with%20various%20peanut%20restrictions%20and%20schools%20without%20them.
https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext#:~:text=Why%20would%20schools%20with%20peanut-free%20policies%20have%20higher%20rates%20of
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5638466/#:~:text=CLOSING%20ARGUMENTS%20%E2%80%94%20YES.%20Peanut%20exposure%20is%20unlikely%20to%20cause
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No, I'm just aware of the data: https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


Your link doesn't work.


Try https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


That doesn't say what you think it says. Read it again.


I'm sorry for you that you're dealing with the fact that the world doesn't work the way you'd expect. That's hard. You need to accept it though.


I'm sorry that you quoted an article after fundamentally misunderstanding what it said. Nowhere did it say that exposing children with peanut allergies to peanut butter is safer for them.


I never said that. I said "peanut free schools don't work," which is exactly what the data shows. Peanut free schools have HIGHER rates of anaphylaxis than schools that aren't peanut free. Do you think a policy that leads to increased rates of anaphylaxis is working?


No that is NOT what the data shows. The data shows higher use of epi pens but it doesn't try to explain why. It also goes on to say that the data does not necessarily who it's because of peanut allergies that the epi pens are used. Only that that they were administered. So is it because paren't sneak in peanut like one of the lunatics on here? or is it because parents trust that the school will protect their child and don't take the necessary precautions themselves? The article did not say that we should just have all schools be peanut friendly.


it absolutely shows higher incidence of accidental exposure.

Also sometimes we go to the park to have dinner and play. These f-in control freaks saying kids cant go 45 minutes without eating....no Susan, I purposefully take a nice night and eat outside at a picnic table and have my kids eat after they play and guess what they get their hands wiped but they probably go back to play.

The park is a public space. Did you know you dont even have to provide reasoning for using the park? You can sit and read and eat a bag of honey roasted peanuts in a sun chair and its not a crime.


It is indeed a public space for EVERYONE!!!!! Not just you and your brats. I think if you really tried, you could probably think of something to feed them that wouldn't cause harm to anyone else. Probably be healthier for them too.

Also, from the article YOU quoted:

"Why would schools with peanut-free policies have higher rates of epinephrine administration? Understanding this will require additional studies, but some possible explanations exist. Inspection of every snack, lunch, or bag brought into the school by every student every day would be required for schools to become truly peanut free. Although letters to parents and reminders might help reduce the presence of peanut inside the school, some parents might inadvertently send these foods to school. It is also possible that less stringent avoidance strategies can be applied because of a false sense of security if a peanut-free policy is in place."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No, I'm just aware of the data: https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


Your link doesn't work.


Try https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


That doesn't say what you think it says. Read it again.


I'm sorry for you that you're dealing with the fact that the world doesn't work the way you'd expect. That's hard. You need to accept it though.


I'm sorry that you quoted an article after fundamentally misunderstanding what it said. Nowhere did it say that exposing children with peanut allergies to peanut butter is safer for them.


I never said that. I said "peanut free schools don't work," which is exactly what the data shows. Peanut free schools have HIGHER rates of anaphylaxis than schools that aren't peanut free. Do you think a policy that leads to increased rates of anaphylaxis is working?


No that is NOT what the data shows. The data shows higher use of epi pens but it doesn't try to explain why. It also goes on to say that the data does not necessarily who it's because of peanut allergies that the epi pens are used. Only that that they were administered. So is it because paren't sneak in peanut like one of the lunatics on here? or is it because parents trust that the school will protect their child and don't take the necessary precautions themselves? The article did not say that we should just have all schools be peanut friendly.


So does an intervention that doesn't change the outcome it's trying to change work? Yes or no? If parents "trust" in peanut free schools is leading them to not to take the proper precautions should to continue peanut free schools even though it's putting kids in danger?

I'd be fine with peanut free schools if there was any reason to think they were keeping kids safe, but there's not. Show me the evidence that they work.


I mean, I sort of get what you're saying, but is this your argument for letting your kid smear peanut butter all over playground equipment? Because then show me evidence that is not going to cause a reaction in a highly allergic kid!! JFC
Anonymous
I don't get why people let their kids run around a playground with food in hand.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No they dont. The peer reviewed papers do not state that it reduces risk. Its not even recommended by medical groups.



Are you the same one who posted the link above?


No I am someone who has to constantly make allowances for other kids allergies when literally my kids allergy food is EVERYWHERE and I just got fed up with hearing about how its protective when it is not.

https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/04/07/peanut-free-school-zones-dont-work-11104#:~:text=Do%20they%20work%3F%20No.%20A%20new%20article%20published,with%20various%20peanut%20restrictions%20and%20schools%20without%20them.
https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext#:~:text=Why%20would%20schools%20with%20peanut-free%20policies%20have%20higher%20rates%20of
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5638466/#:~:text=CLOSING%20ARGUMENTS%20%E2%80%94%20YES.%20Peanut%20exposure%20is%20unlikely%20to%20cause


So then, we shouldn't take any precations to protect toddlers and young children at the playground? I don't understand.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don't get why people let their kids run around a playground with food in hand.


Because they are lazy and have no manners.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No, I'm just aware of the data: https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


Your link doesn't work.


Try https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


That doesn't say what you think it says. Read it again.


I'm sorry for you that you're dealing with the fact that the world doesn't work the way you'd expect. That's hard. You need to accept it though.


I'm sorry that you quoted an article after fundamentally misunderstanding what it said. Nowhere did it say that exposing children with peanut allergies to peanut butter is safer for them.


I never said that. I said "peanut free schools don't work," which is exactly what the data shows. Peanut free schools have HIGHER rates of anaphylaxis than schools that aren't peanut free. Do you think a policy that leads to increased rates of anaphylaxis is working?


No that is NOT what the data shows. The data shows higher use of epi pens but it doesn't try to explain why. It also goes on to say that the data does not necessarily who it's because of peanut allergies that the epi pens are used. Only that that they were administered. So is it because paren't sneak in peanut like one of the lunatics on here? or is it because parents trust that the school will protect their child and don't take the necessary precautions themselves? The article did not say that we should just have all schools be peanut friendly.


So does an intervention that doesn't change the outcome it's trying to change work? Yes or no? If parents "trust" in peanut free schools is leading them to not to take the proper precautions should to continue peanut free schools even though it's putting kids in danger?

I'd be fine with peanut free schools if there was any reason to think they were keeping kids safe, but there's not. Show me the evidence that they work.


I mean, I sort of get what you're saying, but is this your argument for letting your kid smear peanut butter all over playground equipment? Because then show me evidence that is not going to cause a reaction in a highly allergic kid!! JFC


My argument was clearly stated in my first comment in this thread "[p]eanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better." That is, rules against bringing peanuts into schools do not reduce the rates of allergic reactions at the schools, so rules (either official or social rules enforced by yelling at people on the internet) against bringing peanut butter sandwiches to the playground (which are even less enforceable than rules against bringing peanut butter into schools) aren't going to reduce the numbers of people having allergic reactions to peanuts at parks.

My kids don't eat at the playground, so this isn't about my behavior. It's about limiting the official rules we make at school and the social rules we make everywhere to only those things which have some evidence to back them up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No, I'm just aware of the data: https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


Your link doesn't work.


Try https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


That doesn't say what you think it says. Read it again.


I'm sorry for you that you're dealing with the fact that the world doesn't work the way you'd expect. That's hard. You need to accept it though.


I'm sorry that you quoted an article after fundamentally misunderstanding what it said. Nowhere did it say that exposing children with peanut allergies to peanut butter is safer for them.


I never said that. I said "peanut free schools don't work," which is exactly what the data shows. Peanut free schools have HIGHER rates of anaphylaxis than schools that aren't peanut free. Do you think a policy that leads to increased rates of anaphylaxis is working?


No that is NOT what the data shows. The data shows higher use of epi pens but it doesn't try to explain why. It also goes on to say that the data does not necessarily who it's because of peanut allergies that the epi pens are used. Only that that they were administered. So is it because paren't sneak in peanut like one of the lunatics on here? or is it because parents trust that the school will protect their child and don't take the necessary precautions themselves? The article did not say that we should just have all schools be peanut friendly.


So does an intervention that doesn't change the outcome it's trying to change work? Yes or no? If parents "trust" in peanut free schools is leading them to not to take the proper precautions should to continue peanut free schools even though it's putting kids in danger?

I'd be fine with peanut free schools if there was any reason to think they were keeping kids safe, but there's not. Show me the evidence that they work.


I mean, I sort of get what you're saying, but is this your argument for letting your kid smear peanut butter all over playground equipment? Because then show me evidence that is not going to cause a reaction in a highly allergic kid!! JFC


My argument was clearly stated in my first comment in this thread "[p]eanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better." That is, rules against bringing peanuts into schools do not reduce the rates of allergic reactions at the schools, so rules (either official or social rules enforced by yelling at people on the internet) against bringing peanut butter sandwiches to the playground (which are even less enforceable than rules against bringing peanut butter into schools) aren't going to reduce the numbers of people having allergic reactions to peanuts at parks.

My kids don't eat at the playground, so this isn't about my behavior. It's about limiting the official rules we make at school and the social rules we make everywhere to only those things which have some evidence to back them up.


That's all nice and well if you could also explain WHY peanut-free schools "don't work." The fact remains that some kids are highly allergic and I know that I could be causing them serious harm by exposing them directly so I choose not to do it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No, I'm just aware of the data: https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


Your link doesn't work.


Try https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


That doesn't say what you think it says. Read it again.


I'm sorry for you that you're dealing with the fact that the world doesn't work the way you'd expect. That's hard. You need to accept it though.


I'm sorry that you quoted an article after fundamentally misunderstanding what it said. Nowhere did it say that exposing children with peanut allergies to peanut butter is safer for them.


I never said that. I said "peanut free schools don't work," which is exactly what the data shows. Peanut free schools have HIGHER rates of anaphylaxis than schools that aren't peanut free. Do you think a policy that leads to increased rates of anaphylaxis is working?


No that is NOT what the data shows. The data shows higher use of epi pens but it doesn't try to explain why. It also goes on to say that the data does not necessarily who it's because of peanut allergies that the epi pens are used. Only that that they were administered. So is it because paren't sneak in peanut like one of the lunatics on here? or is it because parents trust that the school will protect their child and don't take the necessary precautions themselves? The article did not say that we should just have all schools be peanut friendly.


So does an intervention that doesn't change the outcome it's trying to change work? Yes or no? If parents "trust" in peanut free schools is leading them to not to take the proper precautions should to continue peanut free schools even though it's putting kids in danger?

I'd be fine with peanut free schools if there was any reason to think they were keeping kids safe, but there's not. Show me the evidence that they work.


I mean, I sort of get what you're saying, but is this your argument for letting your kid smear peanut butter all over playground equipment? Because then show me evidence that is not going to cause a reaction in a highly allergic kid!! JFC


My argument was clearly stated in my first comment in this thread "[p]eanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better." That is, rules against bringing peanuts into schools do not reduce the rates of allergic reactions at the schools, so rules (either official or social rules enforced by yelling at people on the internet) against bringing peanut butter sandwiches to the playground (which are even less enforceable than rules against bringing peanut butter into schools) aren't going to reduce the numbers of people having allergic reactions to peanuts at parks.

My kids don't eat at the playground, so this isn't about my behavior. It's about limiting the official rules we make at school and the social rules we make everywhere to only those things which have some evidence to back them up.


That's all nice and well if you could also explain WHY peanut-free schools "don't work." The fact remains that some kids are highly allergic and I know that I could be causing them serious harm by exposing them directly so I choose not to do it.


-Said while your kid likely has a sippy cup full of milk or yogurt all over their hands/mouth

Multiple people, myself included, have said the issue is any food. The issue is not PB, but someone always has to make it about the allergy kid. Food should be kept to food spaces, which include picnic tables. The last time this convo came up on this forum there were many posters who insisted that even having a PBJ at a picnic table was harmful.
No one should be running around with ANY food at a playground but the park itself and/or picnic tables should be expected to be used.

Why I continue to harp about the rabid anti-PB posters is because its a ridiculous concept to think that ONLY peanut butter should be disavowed at the local playground and you show your own bias by dictating so.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No, I'm just aware of the data: https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


Your link doesn't work.


Try https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


That doesn't say what you think it says. Read it again.


I'm sorry for you that you're dealing with the fact that the world doesn't work the way you'd expect. That's hard. You need to accept it though.


I'm sorry that you quoted an article after fundamentally misunderstanding what it said. Nowhere did it say that exposing children with peanut allergies to peanut butter is safer for them.


I never said that. I said "peanut free schools don't work," which is exactly what the data shows. Peanut free schools have HIGHER rates of anaphylaxis than schools that aren't peanut free. Do you think a policy that leads to increased rates of anaphylaxis is working?


No that is NOT what the data shows. The data shows higher use of epi pens but it doesn't try to explain why. It also goes on to say that the data does not necessarily who it's because of peanut allergies that the epi pens are used. Only that that they were administered. So is it because paren't sneak in peanut like one of the lunatics on here? or is it because parents trust that the school will protect their child and don't take the necessary precautions themselves? The article did not say that we should just have all schools be peanut friendly.


So does an intervention that doesn't change the outcome it's trying to change work? Yes or no? If parents "trust" in peanut free schools is leading them to not to take the proper precautions should to continue peanut free schools even though it's putting kids in danger?

I'd be fine with peanut free schools if there was any reason to think they were keeping kids safe, but there's not. Show me the evidence that they work.


I mean, I sort of get what you're saying, but is this your argument for letting your kid smear peanut butter all over playground equipment? Because then show me evidence that is not going to cause a reaction in a highly allergic kid!! JFC


My argument was clearly stated in my first comment in this thread "[p]eanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better." That is, rules against bringing peanuts into schools do not reduce the rates of allergic reactions at the schools, so rules (either official or social rules enforced by yelling at people on the internet) against bringing peanut butter sandwiches to the playground (which are even less enforceable than rules against bringing peanut butter into schools) aren't going to reduce the numbers of people having allergic reactions to peanuts at parks.

My kids don't eat at the playground, so this isn't about my behavior. It's about limiting the official rules we make at school and the social rules we make everywhere to only those things which have some evidence to back them up.


That's all nice and well if you could also explain WHY peanut-free schools "don't work." The fact remains that some kids are highly allergic and I know that I could be causing them serious harm by exposing them directly so I choose not to do it.


There's a few possibilities, I'd guess that parents and students are less careful when an area is labelled "peanut free," but I can't prove it. If that's the case then establishing an expectation that playgrounds will be peanut free has as similar effect. It makes the playground MORE dangerous, not less.

For schools, though, my question would be, why do you need that explanation? If the evidence is that having a peanut free school zone increases the rate of anaphylaxis, why would you continue doing it? If the concern is about what could be causing kids with allergies great harm why not avoid a policy where the only evidence is that it increases the risk of harm.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No, I'm just aware of the data: https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


Your link doesn't work.


Try https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


That doesn't say what you think it says. Read it again.


I'm sorry for you that you're dealing with the fact that the world doesn't work the way you'd expect. That's hard. You need to accept it though.


I'm sorry that you quoted an article after fundamentally misunderstanding what it said. Nowhere did it say that exposing children with peanut allergies to peanut butter is safer for them.


I never said that. I said "peanut free schools don't work," which is exactly what the data shows. Peanut free schools have HIGHER rates of anaphylaxis than schools that aren't peanut free. Do you think a policy that leads to increased rates of anaphylaxis is working?


No that is NOT what the data shows. The data shows higher use of epi pens but it doesn't try to explain why. It also goes on to say that the data does not necessarily who it's because of peanut allergies that the epi pens are used. Only that that they were administered. So is it because paren't sneak in peanut like one of the lunatics on here? or is it because parents trust that the school will protect their child and don't take the necessary precautions themselves? The article did not say that we should just have all schools be peanut friendly.


So does an intervention that doesn't change the outcome it's trying to change work? Yes or no? If parents "trust" in peanut free schools is leading them to not to take the proper precautions should to continue peanut free schools even though it's putting kids in danger?

I'd be fine with peanut free schools if there was any reason to think they were keeping kids safe, but there's not. Show me the evidence that they work.


I mean, I sort of get what you're saying, but is this your argument for letting your kid smear peanut butter all over playground equipment? Because then show me evidence that is not going to cause a reaction in a highly allergic kid!! JFC


My argument was clearly stated in my first comment in this thread "[p]eanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better." That is, rules against bringing peanuts into schools do not reduce the rates of allergic reactions at the schools, so rules (either official or social rules enforced by yelling at people on the internet) against bringing peanut butter sandwiches to the playground (which are even less enforceable than rules against bringing peanut butter into schools) aren't going to reduce the numbers of people having allergic reactions to peanuts at parks.

My kids don't eat at the playground, so this isn't about my behavior. It's about limiting the official rules we make at school and the social rules we make everywhere to only those things which have some evidence to back them up.


That's all nice and well if you could also explain WHY peanut-free schools "don't work." The fact remains that some kids are highly allergic and I know that I could be causing them serious harm by exposing them directly so I choose not to do it.


-Said while your kid likely has a sippy cup full of milk or yogurt all over their hands/mouth

Multiple people, myself included, have said the issue is any food. The issue is not PB, but someone always has to make it about the allergy kid. Food should be kept to food spaces, which include picnic tables. The last time this convo came up on this forum there were many posters who insisted that even having a PBJ at a picnic table was harmful.
No one should be running around with ANY food at a playground but the park itself and/or picnic tables should be expected to be used.

Why I continue to harp about the rabid anti-PB posters is because its a ridiculous concept to think that ONLY peanut butter should be disavowed at the local playground and you show your own bias by dictating so.


What bias???? For wanting to keep all of the kids safe? How horrible of me, I guess. Sure, you can try to make the faux argument that all food is potentially as dangerous as peanuts. But it's just not. And yes, I do agree that truly we should minimize ALL food at the park. Larlo doesn't need to be snacking every 30 min. Maybe it's because I'm not American but this is so strange to me. And it's fairly recent too. I don't think boomers constantly fed us like this generation of parents does. And if you insist of feeding them, do it in a designated area not while running on equipment. It is beyond me why anyone would disagree.

I've repeatedly stated that my child
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Thoughts?

Beyond being messy & a choking hazarded IMO kind of inconsiderate of kids who may have peanut allergies.

What happened to using the picnic tables right next to the playground.


The peanut allergy people need to adjust. Not the rest of society.


Nonsense. Peanuts are not the benign, tasty treat you think they are. They are as dangerous as guns.


I wasn’t going to send uncrustables to the park but maybe I will now just to watch you explode.


Oh you don't need to double down. We already know that you're a horrible person.


We also know you’re trolling and none of this happened.


I'm not OP. Apparently you're perfectly willing to do it so why exactly isn't it believable?


Acting like PB at the park is like playing with loaded guns is ridiculous. How many children died from peanut exposure at the park last year vs how many died from guns?



I didn't make that comparison, but your logic is flawed. How many kids NEED to die due to peanut butter eallergies at parks for you to start being concerned about this?


I’m not concerned about this is a YP. I have my own problems, are you concerned about my kids?


Given you are their parent. Yes I am.


See you at the park later! We’ll all be eating PB. Nom nom!


Hope someone brings their unleashed pitty just to even the paying field.


I’ll bring my gun so no problem.


JFC you are unhinged.


That went off the rails!
Anonymous
I don’t want your kid’s nasty PBJ smear all over everything. Not allergic, that’s just gross and people suck. I went into Panera the other day and COULD NOT BELIEVE the mess some people allow their children to make under the table and then just walk away.

So trashy and low class.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Thoughts?

Beyond being messy & a choking hazarded IMO kind of inconsiderate of kids who may have peanut allergies.

What happened to using the picnic tables right next to the playground.


The peanut allergy people need to adjust. Not the rest of society.


Agreed. As PP said, this is a you problem. A good majority of the world eats peanuts in some form or fashion and you cannot demand that everyone stop eating this food staple because of your kid.

Start introducing the allergen now or don't go out in public.


But Americans are the only ones who are OBSESSED with snacking constantly. Kids in Europe go to the park to play and use up some energy. They don't sit down after 20 min to eat. They don't take food to the park at all.


And how is that relevant?


It is relevant. If you have to eat in the 45 min that you're there, you most certainly can choose something that isn't potentially deadly to other children. I can't believe this is something that has to be spelled out.


Typical MAGA. My right to do something I really don’t need to do and that’s actively dangerous to others trumps others comfort and safety.



Typical lib. Infringes on people’s rights like a commie. But will do what they want.


hahahahahhaaha
infringing by keeping ALL of the kids safe. Are you even aware of what you're saying or do you just spew verbal diarrhea?

Ahaaahhahhahhaahah!
Infringing by policing what people eat. Are you even aware of what you’re saying or do you just spew what you want to enforce onto others?


hey nutso, I'm not hurting anyone by doing what I'm doing. You couldn't potentially kill a child. Want to keep going?


Chicken sh!t
Anonymous
So are we making playgrounds also sesame free? Shellfish free? Mustard free? Latex free? Soy free?

PB is not the only allergen that causes anaphylaxis, as many posters have tried to point out.

I’m all for people worried about food and the like at playgrounds, but the peanut hysteria is bizarre. For all you know, it’s a Sunbutter sandwich. But letting your kid run around with a sandwich is a choking hazard, not to mention their gross hands from the equipment (rust, bird poop and goodness knows what else)
Forum Index » General Parenting Discussion
Go to: