Playground etiquette: running around with pb&j sandwich

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it's one angry allergy parent who wants to control the world for her kid. That same parent doesn't give a rat's ass about other kids or their issues.



You are the only angry parent on here who doesn't care about seriously harming another child. But nice try.


Found the allergy parent lol.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No, I'm just aware of the data: https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


Your link doesn't work.


Try https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


That doesn't say what you think it says. Read it again.


I'm sorry for you that you're dealing with the fact that the world doesn't work the way you'd expect. That's hard. You need to accept it though.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No, I'm just aware of the data: https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


Your link doesn't work.


Try https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


That doesn't say what you think it says. Read it again.


I'm sorry for you that you're dealing with the fact that the world doesn't work the way you'd expect. That's hard. You need to accept it though.


I'm sorry that you quoted an article after fundamentally misunderstanding what it said. Nowhere did it say that exposing children with peanut allergies to peanut butter is safer for them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No, I'm just aware of the data: https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


Your link doesn't work.


Try https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


That doesn't say what you think it says. Read it again.


I'm sorry for you that you're dealing with the fact that the world doesn't work the way you'd expect. That's hard. You need to accept it though.


I'm sorry that you quoted an article after fundamentally misunderstanding what it said. Nowhere did it say that exposing children with peanut allergies to peanut butter is safer for them.


I never said that. I said "peanut free schools don't work," which is exactly what the data shows. Peanut free schools have HIGHER rates of anaphylaxis than schools that aren't peanut free. Do you think a policy that leads to increased rates of anaphylaxis is working?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it's one angry allergy parent who wants to control the world for her kid. That same parent doesn't give a rat's ass about other kids or their issues.



You are the only angry parent on here who doesn't care about seriously harming another child. But nice try.


You’re the only angry parent on here who doesn’t care about anyone but her little troll self. Try harder.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That reminds me to buy uncrustables.


Not surprising that you are obsessed with junk food since you're dumb as rocks.


Not surprised that you want to police what people eat since you’re so stupid you would throw yourself to the ground and miss.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That reminds me to buy uncrustables.


Not surprising that you are obsessed with junk food since you're dumb as rocks.


You’re obsessed with what people eat. That indicates you’re dumber than a box of rocks.
Anonymous
Honestly, running around with a turkey sandwich on a playground is poor etiquette as well.

Teach your kids some manners. Everyone thinks they'll teach them the manners once they are older, but that never works. And you end up with tweens and teens that dont know how to behave at a dinner table
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That reminds me to buy uncrustables.


Not surprising that you are obsessed with junk food since you're dumb as rocks.


I’m going to bake peanut butter cookies and pass them around.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No, I'm just aware of the data: https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


Your link doesn't work.


Try https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


That doesn't say what you think it says. Read it again.


I'm sorry for you that you're dealing with the fact that the world doesn't work the way you'd expect. That's hard. You need to accept it though.


I'm sorry that you quoted an article after fundamentally misunderstanding what it said. Nowhere did it say that exposing children with peanut allergies to peanut butter is safer for them.


I never said that. I said "peanut free schools don't work," which is exactly what the data shows. Peanut free schools have HIGHER rates of anaphylaxis than schools that aren't peanut free. Do you think a policy that leads to increased rates of anaphylaxis is working?


No that is NOT what the data shows. The data shows higher use of epi pens but it doesn't try to explain why. It also goes on to say that the data does not necessarily who it's because of peanut allergies that the epi pens are used. Only that that they were administered. So is it because paren't sneak in peanut like one of the lunatics on here? or is it because parents trust that the school will protect their child and don't take the necessary precautions themselves? The article did not say that we should just have all schools be peanut friendly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That reminds me to buy uncrustables.


Not surprising that you are obsessed with junk food since you're dumb as rocks.


You’re obsessed with what people eat. That indicates you’re dumber than a box of rocks.


You're really not doing yourself any favors by digging in your heels. It just makes you look more and more crazy with every post. It's almost like you're HOPING to inflict harm.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No they dont. The peer reviewed papers do not state that it reduces risk. Its not even recommended by medical groups.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No they dont. The peer reviewed papers do not state that it reduces risk. Its not even recommended by medical groups.



Are you the same one who posted the link above?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No, I'm just aware of the data: https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


Your link doesn't work.


Try https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


That doesn't say what you think it says. Read it again.


I'm sorry for you that you're dealing with the fact that the world doesn't work the way you'd expect. That's hard. You need to accept it though.


I'm sorry that you quoted an article after fundamentally misunderstanding what it said. Nowhere did it say that exposing children with peanut allergies to peanut butter is safer for them.


I never said that. I said "peanut free schools don't work," which is exactly what the data shows. Peanut free schools have HIGHER rates of anaphylaxis than schools that aren't peanut free. Do you think a policy that leads to increased rates of anaphylaxis is working?


No that is NOT what the data shows. The data shows higher use of epi pens but it doesn't try to explain why. It also goes on to say that the data does not necessarily who it's because of peanut allergies that the epi pens are used. Only that that they were administered. So is it because paren't sneak in peanut like one of the lunatics on here? or is it because parents trust that the school will protect their child and don't take the necessary precautions themselves? The article did not say that we should just have all schools be peanut friendly.


it absolutely shows higher incidence of accidental exposure.

Also sometimes we go to the park to have dinner and play. These f-in control freaks saying kids cant go 45 minutes without eating....no Susan, I purposefully take a nice night and eat outside at a picnic table and have my kids eat after they play and guess what they get their hands wiped but they probably go back to play.

The park is a public space. Did you know you dont even have to provide reasoning for using the park? You can sit and read and eat a bag of honey roasted peanuts in a sun chair and its not a crime.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Peanut free schools don't work to prevent reactions, I don't see how peanut free parks would be any better.


Uhm yes they do. Are you insane?


No, I'm just aware of the data: https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


Your link doesn't work.


Try https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(17)30666-8/fulltext


That doesn't say what you think it says. Read it again.


I'm sorry for you that you're dealing with the fact that the world doesn't work the way you'd expect. That's hard. You need to accept it though.


I'm sorry that you quoted an article after fundamentally misunderstanding what it said. Nowhere did it say that exposing children with peanut allergies to peanut butter is safer for them.


I never said that. I said "peanut free schools don't work," which is exactly what the data shows. Peanut free schools have HIGHER rates of anaphylaxis than schools that aren't peanut free. Do you think a policy that leads to increased rates of anaphylaxis is working?


No that is NOT what the data shows. The data shows higher use of epi pens but it doesn't try to explain why. It also goes on to say that the data does not necessarily who it's because of peanut allergies that the epi pens are used. Only that that they were administered. So is it because paren't sneak in peanut like one of the lunatics on here? or is it because parents trust that the school will protect their child and don't take the necessary precautions themselves? The article did not say that we should just have all schools be peanut friendly.


So does an intervention that doesn't change the outcome it's trying to change work? Yes or no? If parents "trust" in peanut free schools is leading them to not to take the proper precautions should to continue peanut free schools even though it's putting kids in danger?

I'd be fine with peanut free schools if there was any reason to think they were keeping kids safe, but there's not. Show me the evidence that they work.
Forum Index » General Parenting Discussion
Go to: