Thank you Liz Cheney!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Kamala Harris is a radical liberal who would raise taxes, take away guns & health insurance, and explode the size and power of the federal gov’t. She wants to recreate America in the image of what’s happening on the streets of Portland & Seattle. We won’t give her the chance."

Liz Cheney

Cheney completely took apart her endorsed candidate. LMAO. It’s sad that she would attempt to inflict four years of a radical-left Harris presidency on the country due to her personal vendetta against Donald Trump. She and her father aren’t supporting democracy or putting country above partisanship. They are putting their own personal vendetta ahead of the country.

No. As Luttig noted in his endorsement of Harris: better to suffer through a few years of Harris policy than lose our country.

+1 it's actually the other way... she sees Trump as an existential threat to this country, more so than "radical left" Harris, which she actually isn't that radical left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Kamala Harris is a radical liberal who would raise taxes, take away guns & health insurance, and explode the size and power of the federal gov’t. She wants to recreate America in the image of what’s happening on the streets of Portland & Seattle. We won’t give her the chance."

Liz Cheney

Cheney completely took apart her endorsed candidate. LMAO. It’s sad that she would attempt to inflict four years of a radical-left Harris presidency on the country due to her personal vendetta against Donald Trump. She and her father aren’t supporting democracy or putting country above partisanship. They are putting their own personal vendetta ahead of the country.

No. As Luttig noted in his endorsement of Harris: better to suffer through a few years of Harris policy than lose our country.

I don’t think we will lose the country with Trump in charge. I think we will lose the country with four years of Kamala Harris’ socialism, open borders extremism and weakness on the world stage.

But you’re just making stuff up.
Luttig is a highly respected conservative who put his name and reputation on the line with his endorsement.

You are an anonymous poster who is spouting nonsensical garbage.

But go ahead and vote for Trump if you’re an eligible American voter and enjoy the fruits of high inflation and increased immigration. You know that Trump now thinks we need more immigration, right? And that he is a laughing stock on foreign policy? And he’ll have the government pay for IVF for everyone and for childcare.

I’m not a political elite siting on my ivory tower like that “conservative” anti-Trump judge. I have to worry about far more important and immediate things in my life than what some elitist thinks will “protect democracy.” That doesn’t affect my life.

Democracy doesn't impact your life? You think a sitting POTUS trying to overthrow the election doesn't impact your life?

I mean, I guess that's how the Germans felt when Hitler came to power... "Killing those Jews isn't going to impact my life. As long as he makes Germany great again, I'm voting for him."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is no longer a king maker. His endorsement is a negative for any candidate. Everybody knows it. Now everybody knows that everybody knows it. Once Trump is gone the Republican party can thrive again.

Can it? Can anyone point to the moment when it began to fall apart, because Trump isn’t the (sole) problem in that party. My big three issues with the GOP are their treachery against their own country as displayed to its nadir on January 6, their treason in working with Russia to affect the outcome of elections here and their fascism. Take Trump out of those and all three are still very much problems within the GOP. I’ve said it before but I’ll repeat myself: Trump is the weird zit, but the rotting body of the GOP is the actual problem.

[Anonymous]

The establishment supporting one of their own. The old guard GOP are essentially RINO swamp creatures.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is no longer a king maker. His endorsement is a negative for any candidate. Everybody knows it. Now everybody knows that everybody knows it. Once Trump is gone the Republican party can thrive again.

Can it? Can anyone point to the moment when it began to fall apart, because Trump isn’t the (sole) problem in that party. My big three issues with the GOP are their treachery against their own country as displayed to its nadir on January 6, their treason in working with Russia to affect the outcome of elections here and their fascism. Take Trump out of those and all three are still very much problems within the GOP. I’ve said it before but I’ll repeat myself: Trump is the weird zit, but the rotting body of the GOP is the actual problem.

Those are all symptoms of the Trump parasite leech sucking money out of the GOP and injecting maga poison in. Can the GOP recover from the poison? Idk, but for America's sake I hope so. We need substantive conservative voices to counter the far left insanity.

[Anonymous]

That’s the thing. I actually don’t like Kamala Harris but I hope in four years to vote her out. Hopefully the country can recover from whatever she cooks up. Trump on the other hand, there won’t be anymore voting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That’s the thing. I actually don’t like Kamala Harris but I hope in four years to vote her out. Hopefully the country can recover from whatever she cooks up. Trump on the other hand, there won’t be anymore voting.

Trump was already President. If he was going to suspend voting, he would have already done it during Covid chaos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s the thing. I actually don’t like Kamala Harris but I hope in four years to vote her out. Hopefully the country can recover from whatever she cooks up. Trump on the other hand, there won’t be anymore voting.

Trump was already President. If he was going to suspend voting, he would have already done it during Covid chaos.

Tell you what - even before Jan 6, I didn't really want to just take a wait and see approach with Trump. But now that he actually attempted a coup, I think I'll really not just take your word for it.

[Anonymous]

Celebrating the endorsement of the guy that orchestrated the most destructive and destabilizing foreign policy of the last 100 years is not the own you guys think it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Celebrating the endorsement of the guy that orchestrated the most destructive and destabilizing foreign policy of the last 100 years is not the own you guys think it is.

Gore and Kerry would have been better. And Harris is a much wiser choice then Trump. Hands down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s the thing. I actually don’t like Kamala Harris but I hope in four years to vote her out. Hopefully the country can recover from whatever she cooks up. Trump on the other hand, there won’t be anymore voting.

Trump was already President. If he was going to suspend voting, he would have already done it during Covid chaos.

True. That was the most perfect opportunity for that type of action since at least WW2

[Anonymous]

Dick Cheney is obviously trying to change the search algorithm when his name is Googled. Instead of noting that he lied to start more than two decades of war to enhance the wealth of the Republican war machine, he will now be associated with the first woman to become president of the United States.

More's the pity that the first women president should have been Liz Cheney. But she did not have the right parentage. Had Liz Cheney been abandoned by a Kenyan father to be raced by his white mother and grandparents or a abandoned by a Jamaican father to be raised by her East Asian Indian mother, she would be suitable. Being raised in an intact household with two white parents not longer makes a woman suitable for the presidency.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Celebrating the endorsement of the guy that orchestrated the most destructive and destabilizing foreign policy of the last 100 years is not the own you guys think it is.

Gore and Kerry would have been better. And Harris is a much wiser choice then Trump. Hands down.

Of course. They were both smart enough to marry wealthy women, so the presidency would have been easy peasy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Kamala Harris is a radical liberal who would raise taxes, take away guns & health insurance, and explode the size and power of the federal gov’t. She wants to recreate America in the image of what’s happening on the streets of Portland & Seattle. We won’t give her the chance."

Liz Cheney

Cheney completely took apart her endorsed candidate. LMAO. It’s sad that she would attempt to inflict four years of a radical-left Harris presidency on the country due to her personal vendetta against Donald Trump. She and her father aren’t supporting democracy or putting country above partisanship. They are putting their own personal vendetta ahead of the country.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Celebrating the endorsement of the guy that orchestrated the most destructive and destabilizing foreign policy of the last 100 years is not the own you guys think it is.

Gore and Kerry would have been better. And Harris is a much wiser choice then Trump. Hands down.

Of course. They were both smart enough to marry wealthy women, so the presidency would have been easy peasy.

Gore did not marry a wealthy woman. In fact, she married up as her FIL was a US Senator from Tennessee.