Second Gentleman scandal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is weird that they think this story is going to get any traction. No one gives a flying

Right.
Unless there's way more to the story. This is nothing.

I honestly don't know why they are bothering with this and the race stuff.

They should stick to the border, the economy and. Transgender rights.

They have to defame the candidate because 1. Most Americans don’t want conservative policy and 2. Trump can’t stand on his own 2 feet as a candidate

[Anonymous]

Trump is a doofus and is truly clutching at straws.

[Anonymous]

Or have*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now I’m worried about what other skeletons Emhoff might have in his closet. Cheating is rarely a one-off.

Wait until Mark Kelly appears on the scene.

What?? Please don’t tell me his devoted husband persona is fake. I’ll be heartbroken, and many many others.

I'm not expecting much really. He ran for Senate and nothing came up then

Nothing came up on Harris/Emhoff during vp vetting. Or they figured out how to bury it for a time. Ugh.

1. Harris Enhoff isn't a ticket.

2. Harris stuff has come up many times no one cares about affairs when you're running against someone who literally tried to overthrow the election

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump claimed his kids, that's the difference. If Emhoff has a kid that he is not claiming, adoption or otherwise, it's nasty. To know that your bio-dad and bio-siblings were in the white house that is bad.

And it is a big difference.

According to the article, there is no kid.

There is no kid.

They’re going to keep repeating this, sans evidence, it because they know that fools will believe anything if they repeat it enough. That’s just their MO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to be clear - everyone thinks that the conduct of their spouse, before being married to them, should be relevant criteria for job selection. In that the standard you prefer?

Of course we think so! Otherwise what was the point exposing Melania nude photos??? That is the standard the we established and this is the standard we should keep.

What standard is this? Did anyone actually care about Melania’s photos? I didn’t. I never really cared about anything Melania did.

[Anonymous]

lol I mean Trump - the guy who was actually President and is running for a 3rd time - is guilty of the same thing as Doug Emhoff!

Personally, I think this was a leak from within the Dems to try to jawbone Harris on her VP pick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:lol I mean Trump - the guy who was actually President and is running for a 3rd time - is guilty of the same thing as Doug Emhoff!

Personally, I think this was a leak from within the Dems to try to jawbone Harris on her VP pick.

Jawbone for who?
This info doesn’t help anyone.
To be fair it doesn’t hurt anyone either.
Literally it means nothing to no one.

[Anonymous]

Yawn.

I really don’t care— do you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans: STOP COMPLAINING ABOUT WHATABOUTISM. Own how bad your guy is. OWN IT. Anything short of that is straight up dishonest.

Move to a 100 other threads to discuss Trup, this thread is not about him. This is the only thread about Harris’s husband. You bringing Trump into this is weird.

Trump is his wife’s OPPONENT. Your pathetic attempt to use this line of “don’t talk about Trump” when you’re attempting to use the guy *not running* to make the swine you support who IS running, look good, won’t work. The idiocy of telling people not to talk about Trump on THIS topic, is particularly laughable.

You want to know how stupid this is? Fine. Do we get to start a thread on how Harris was never an illegal immigrant who took disgusting nude pictures of herself covering her p**** and had a questionable background as an “architect” or is that level of stupidity only allowed with Republicans who get to compare Dem spouses with the Republican *running*?

[Anonymous]

Are the MAGAs really trying to make this a thing?

Talk about weird.

[Anonymous]

Least*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol I mean Trump - the guy who was actually President and is running for a 3rd time - is guilty of the same thing as Doug Emhoff!

Personally, I think this was a leak from within the Dems to try to jawbone Harris on her VP pick.

Agree. There is absolutely o point for republicans to bring this up.

If this was a Republican leak, they would wait to hold this info until after the convention in order to turn the news cycle in a Trump-led narrative.

This leak - right before Harris is about to pick her VP - is clearly coming out from some group on the Dem side of the spectrum. It’s a warning shot to Harris. My guess is that Wall Street and other special interests have their favored choice for VP and if they don’t get it, they are willing to declare war on Harris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol I mean Trump - the guy who was actually President and is running for a 3rd time - is guilty of the same thing as Doug Emhoff!

Personally, I think this was a leak from within the Dems to try to jawbone Harris on her VP pick.

Agree. There is absolutely o point for republicans to bring this up.

If this was a Republican leak, they would wait to hold this info until after the convention in order to turn the news cycle in a Trump-led narrative.

This leak - right before Harris is about to pick her VP - is clearly coming out from some group on the Dem side of the spectrum. It’s a warning shot to Harris. My guess is that Wall Street and other special interests have their favored choice for VP and if they don’t get it, they are willing to declare war on Harris.

This is their big shot?
Man that’s weak sauce.
Lame.

[Anonymous]

Trump and Vance are so weird