Saving seats on SWA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you're selfish and can't let someone out. Got it.

Sure I can, but it’s not faster for anyone to let him out and not get off the plane myself.

Do you like spending more time on planes with young children? No? Neither does anyone sitting near me. We’ll be disembarking at our turn thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you're selfish and can't let someone out. Got it.

There is a large online contingent of entitled "disabled" people and/or their relatives who get SUPER testy if you try to take any of their freebies/preferential treatment away or state that the accomodations could be dialed back or offered to a more limited group. Just go spend 5 minutes on the Disboard disAbilities forum and you will see exactly what I mean.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you selfishly take an aisle and middle and some point in the boarding process have to get out of your seats again, to let someone scoot over to the window, thus delaying boarding? Why aren't you in the middle and window yourselves since you care a lot about efficient boarding and boarding processes.

Think this through.

Why would a family traveling with a child with a disability need to sit in the aisle seat.

Think carefully I’m sure it’s going to come to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you're selfish and can't let someone out. Got it.

Sure I can, but it’s not faster for anyone to let him out and not get off the plane myself.

Do you like spending more time on planes with young children? No? Neither does anyone sitting near me. We’ll be disembarking at our turn thanks.

You're a piece of work. It's all about you. I bet if they made an announcement to let people get of first who have a tight connection you would just get up anyway if you didn't b/c it's your turn and you can't spend another minute around your young child. Gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you selfishly take an aisle and middle and some point in the boarding process have to get out of your seats again, to let someone scoot over to the window, thus delaying boarding? Why aren't you in the middle and window yourselves since you care a lot about efficient boarding and boarding processes.

Think this through.

Why would a family traveling with a child with a disability need to sit in the aisle seat.

Think carefully I’m sure it’s going to come to you.

Does the kid need to run up and down the aisle? Good thing the fasten seat belt sign is on for most of the flight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you selfishly take an aisle and middle and some point in the boarding process have to get out of your seats again, to let someone scoot over to the window, thus delaying boarding? Why aren't you in the middle and window yourselves since you care a lot about efficient boarding and boarding processes.

Think this through.

Why would a family traveling with a child with a disability need to sit in the aisle seat.

Think carefully I’m sure it’s going to come to you.

Does the kid need to run up and down the aisle? Good thing the fasten seat belt sign is on for most of the flight.

The kid might need emergency medical attention you dolt, and pulling them over the person in the aisle to administer oxygen or injectable drugs isn’t fun for anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you selfishly take an aisle and middle and some point in the boarding process have to get out of your seats again, to let someone scoot over to the window, thus delaying boarding? Why aren't you in the middle and window yourselves since you care a lot about efficient boarding and boarding processes.

Think this through.

Why would a family traveling with a child with a disability need to sit in the aisle seat.

Think carefully I’m sure it’s going to come to you.

Does the kid need to run up and down the aisle? Good thing the fasten seat belt sign is on for most of the flight.

The kid might need emergency medical attention you dolt, and pulling them over the person in the aisle to administer oxygen or injectable drugs isn’t fun for anyone.

Is the person on the aisle in a coma? They can easily get up, dolt. Think it through.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you selfishly take an aisle and middle and some point in the boarding process have to get out of your seats again, to let someone scoot over to the window, thus delaying boarding? Why aren't you in the middle and window yourselves since you care a lot about efficient boarding and boarding processes.

Think this through.

Why would a family traveling with a child with a disability need to sit in the aisle seat.

Think carefully I’m sure it’s going to come to you.

Does the kid need to run up and down the aisle? Good thing the fasten seat belt sign is on for most of the flight.

The kid might need emergency medical attention you dolt, and pulling them over the person in the aisle to administer oxygen or injectable drugs isn’t fun for anyone.

Is the person on the aisle in a coma? They can easily get up, dolt. Think it through.

Yeah? And if they’re sleeping on a night flight they’ll get up right away? You are willing to bet your child’s life on that? Cause I’m sure not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you selfishly take an aisle and middle and some point in the boarding process have to get out of your seats again, to let someone scoot over to the window, thus delaying boarding? Why aren't you in the middle and window yourselves since you care a lot about efficient boarding and boarding processes.

Think this through.

Why would a family traveling with a child with a disability need to sit in the aisle seat.

Think carefully I’m sure it’s going to come to you.

Does the kid need to run up and down the aisle? Good thing the fasten seat belt sign is on for most of the flight.

The kid might need emergency medical attention you dolt, and pulling them over the person in the aisle to administer oxygen or injectable drugs isn’t fun for anyone.

Is the person on the aisle in a coma? They can easily get up, dolt. Think it through.

Yeah? And if they’re sleeping on a night flight they’ll get up right away? You are willing to bet your child’s life on that? Cause I’m sure not.

What night flight is there on SWA?. Any other flight you would pick your seat making all of this a non issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you selfishly take an aisle and middle and some point in the boarding process have to get out of your seats again, to let someone scoot over to the window, thus delaying boarding? Why aren't you in the middle and window yourselves since you care a lot about efficient boarding and boarding processes.

Think this through.

Why would a family traveling with a child with a disability need to sit in the aisle seat.

Think carefully I’m sure it’s going to come to you.

Does the kid need to run up and down the aisle? Good thing the fasten seat belt sign is on for most of the flight.

The kid might need emergency medical attention you dolt, and pulling them over the person in the aisle to administer oxygen or injectable drugs isn’t fun for anyone.

Is the person on the aisle in a coma? They can easily get up, dolt. Think it through.

Yeah? And if they’re sleeping on a night flight they’ll get up right away? You are willing to bet your child’s life on that? Cause I’m sure not.

You seem like one of those ladies who spends hours a day on the internet arguing about disability accomodations. Am I wrong?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you selfishly take an aisle and middle and some point in the boarding process have to get out of your seats again, to let someone scoot over to the window, thus delaying boarding? Why aren't you in the middle and window yourselves since you care a lot about efficient boarding and boarding processes.

Think this through.

Why would a family traveling with a child with a disability need to sit in the aisle seat.

Think carefully I’m sure it’s going to come to you.

Does the kid need to run up and down the aisle? Good thing the fasten seat belt sign is on for most of the flight.

The kid might need emergency medical attention you dolt, and pulling them over the person in the aisle to administer oxygen or injectable drugs isn’t fun for anyone.

Is the person on the aisle in a coma? They can easily get up, dolt. Think it through.

Yeah? And if they’re sleeping on a night flight they’ll get up right away? You are willing to bet your child’s life on that? Cause I’m sure not.

What night flight is there on SWA?. Any other flight you would pick your seat making all of this a non issue.

The Southwest website will help answer this question for you. The moon and the red letters spelling “overnight” will help you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you selfishly take an aisle and middle and some point in the boarding process have to get out of your seats again, to let someone scoot over to the window, thus delaying boarding? Why aren't you in the middle and window yourselves since you care a lot about efficient boarding and boarding processes.

Think this through.

Why would a family traveling with a child with a disability need to sit in the aisle seat.

Think carefully I’m sure it’s going to come to you.

Does the kid need to run up and down the aisle? Good thing the fasten seat belt sign is on for most of the flight.

The kid might need emergency medical attention you dolt, and pulling them over the person in the aisle to administer oxygen or injectable drugs isn’t fun for anyone.

Is the person on the aisle in a coma? They can easily get up, dolt. Think it through.

Yeah? And if they’re sleeping on a night flight they’ll get up right away? You are willing to bet your child’s life on that? Cause I’m sure not.

What night flight is there on SWA?. Any other flight you would pick your seat making all of this a non issue.

The Southwest website will help answer this question for you. The moon and the red letters spelling “overnight” will help you.

Yeah, sure. They don't do redeyes and it seems like if you were actually concerned you would never take that flight with your child who may not survive the flight. You're so self absorbed and entitled you give no consideration whatsoever to anyone else on the plane. It's all "me, me, me".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you selfishly take an aisle and middle and some point in the boarding process have to get out of your seats again, to let someone scoot over to the window, thus delaying boarding? Why aren't you in the middle and window yourselves since you care a lot about efficient boarding and boarding processes.

Think this through.

Why would a family traveling with a child with a disability need to sit in the aisle seat.

Think carefully I’m sure it’s going to come to you.

Does the kid need to run up and down the aisle? Good thing the fasten seat belt sign is on for most of the flight.

The kid might need emergency medical attention you dolt, and pulling them over the person in the aisle to administer oxygen or injectable drugs isn’t fun for anyone.

Is the person on the aisle in a coma? They can easily get up, dolt. Think it through.

Yeah? And if they’re sleeping on a night flight they’ll get up right away? You are willing to bet your child’s life on that? Cause I’m sure not.

What night flight is there on SWA?. Any other flight you would pick your seat making all of this a non issue.

The Southwest website will help answer this question for you. The moon and the red letters spelling “overnight” will help you.

https://www.travelandleisure.com/southwest-confirms-red-eye-flights-8619766

No red eyes on Southwest currently. Possibly in the future.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you selfishly take an aisle and middle and some point in the boarding process have to get out of your seats again, to let someone scoot over to the window, thus delaying boarding? Why aren't you in the middle and window yourselves since you care a lot about efficient boarding and boarding processes.

Think this through.

Why would a family traveling with a child with a disability need to sit in the aisle seat.

Think carefully I’m sure it’s going to come to you.

Does the kid need to run up and down the aisle? Good thing the fasten seat belt sign is on for most of the flight.

The kid might need emergency medical attention you dolt, and pulling them over the person in the aisle to administer oxygen or injectable drugs isn’t fun for anyone.

Is the person on the aisle in a coma? They can easily get up, dolt. Think it through.

Yeah? And if they’re sleeping on a night flight they’ll get up right away? You are willing to bet your child’s life on that? Cause I’m sure not.

You seem like one of those ladies who spends hours a day on the internet arguing about disability accomodations. Am I wrong?

You are. There’s no real need to argue in 99% of cases— the ADA is clear about what a reasonable accommodation is.
Everything else is just people being angry because their socioeconomic position doesn’t allow them to fly in a more comfortable way.

But someone thinking airlines should assign staff to make sure a kid with a walker or a grandmother with an 02 tank gets off last? That’s just sick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those if you objecting to the seat savers for family because we didn’t pay the extra for A boarding are assuming we’re all paying the exact same amount for our seats. Therefore we shouldn’t we allowed to do it.
The reality is with all airlines the prices are all over the place. You could be sitting next to someone who paid double what you did just to get a ticket.
Just be nice.

Boarding early to have more seat choice is an extra add on (or sometimes included in a higher priced seat). If an individual does not pay for it, they should not get it because their wife paid for it. Imagine paying extra at Disney to skip the line..and then pulling your spouse or whole family in based on your one purchase.

Yes. But this is also true for the pre boarders who don’t pay at all.

Because they have special needs..

Or they claim to. Plenty fake it and admit doing so.

SWA just needs to make sure these people get off last. it's fine to let them board first for their safety and because they need more time. SWA should also ensure their safety by getting them off last so they can take extra time. Safety first.

Preboarding people with disabilities isn’t always about their safety and it isn’t advertised about being for their safety.

And if they waste time with your weird policing the exits policy, to satisfy the weirdly bitter person who had to let a disabled kid get on the plane and stow her O2 before she did, they will have more delays turning over the plane since they have to clean it. People will miss connections, and need to be rebooked at Southwest’s expense. And a flight attendant is standing at the exit to do what? Tell someone to sit down? That delays departure for the whole plane.

Your main character syndrome? Is not relevant to Southwest’s bottom line. Cause you’re still giving them the money.

What difference does it make to the total deboarding time if they are first or last? It doesn't. But everyone else might have connections or reasons to get off first and quicker instead of waiting. There won't be more delays, it just does things in a more orderly way without inconveniencing the whole plane on arrival. These people aren't selfish are they? Surely they wouldn't mind letting others go ahead if they have a connection or have to use the restroom.

On southwest? A huge difference, because they are distributed throughout the plane. So let’s say my daughter and I are sitting in an aisle and middle seat. The person in the window seat isn’t disabled, but we need to let him out, so we have to stand in the aisle, blocking everyone else, but not getting off the plane. Then we have to get back into our seats. We sit close to the front of the plane, so you’re starting your de-boarding process with a delay.

If everyone who pre-boarded was seated at the back of the plane, then having them disembark last would make sense.

So you selfishly take an aisle and middle and some point in the boarding process have to get out of your seats again, to let someone scoot over to the window, thus delaying boarding? Why aren't you in the middle and window yourselves since you care a lot about efficient boarding and boarding processes.

Think this through.

Why would a family traveling with a child with a disability need to sit in the aisle seat.

Think carefully I’m sure it’s going to come to you.

Does the kid need to run up and down the aisle? Good thing the fasten seat belt sign is on for most of the flight.

The kid might need emergency medical attention you dolt, and pulling them over the person in the aisle to administer oxygen or injectable drugs isn’t fun for anyone.

Is the person on the aisle in a coma? They can easily get up, dolt. Think it through.

Yeah? And if they’re sleeping on a night flight they’ll get up right away? You are willing to bet your child’s life on that? Cause I’m sure not.

You seem like one of those ladies who spends hours a day on the internet arguing about disability accomodations. Am I wrong?

You are. There’s no real need to argue in 99% of cases— the ADA is clear about what a reasonable accommodation is.
Everything else is just people being angry because their socioeconomic position doesn’t allow them to fly in a more comfortable way.

But someone thinking airlines should assign staff to make sure a kid with a walker or a grandmother with an 02 tank gets off last? That’s just sick.

It's sick to make sure people can get off safely without standing in a crowded aisle? Get real, you and your kid aren't that disabled you just want first one, first off, because it's nice.