NVSL ASR and excessive heat?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No lights. And weird rules about lanes 1 and 6 and dqing if you went outside some boundary line. I appreciate Rutherford hosting. Nice field. But.. the pool area and pool were pretty rough.


My kid was a Lane 6 swimmer, and they were STRESSED about that boundary line. The backstroke kid alone added probably 3 seconds to their time over their seed time.


Same here. 9-10 girl. Ended up on the lane line on other side of the lane because they were so scared of DQing. This whole thing was ridiculous. The young kids were so stressed out.


Coaches were informed at 3:45 PM. Meet started at 4 PM. Right before clerking, kids got a scary speech about staying inside the green tape. Rutherford was an awesome host (thank you!), but the timing of this update was not ideal.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The comments about the wall causing DQ's made me curious, so I looked up the DQs from last night to see how many there were for the issue.

Zero.

No teams dqed for that.

Event 3: girls 8 and under medley: DQ for alternating kick on fly
Event 4:boys 8 and under medley: Dq for alternating kick on breast, and two dqs for early relay take off.
Event 5: girls 9-10 medley: two dqs for early relay take off.

That doesn't mean that kids weren't worried about it, but no dqs for it



Where can one find these DQs? Is there a way to find them for anyone (not a data person) on the NVSL site? If so, is that information also available for dual meets?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No lights. And weird rules about lanes 1 and 6 and dqing if you went outside some boundary line. I appreciate Rutherford hosting. Nice field. But.. the pool area and pool were pretty rough.


My kid was a Lane 6 swimmer, and they were STRESSED about that boundary line. The backstroke kid alone added probably 3 seconds to their time over their seed time.


Same here. 9-10 girl. Ended up on the lane line on other side of the lane because they were so scared of DQing. This whole thing was ridiculous. The young kids were so stressed out.


Coaches were informed at 3:45 PM. Meet started at 4 PM. Right before clerking, kids got a scary speech about staying inside the green tape. Rutherford was an awesome host (thank you!), but the timing of this update was not ideal.


ah so that was the reason for the 3:45 pm coaches meeting. Insane! Should have been outlined in meet guides, at pool familiarization day and emailed out to reps as soon as they realized this issue.

So is this why KG 8 and girls DQd for "other"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The comments about the wall causing DQ's made me curious, so I looked up the DQs from last night to see how many there were for the issue.

Zero.

No teams dqed for that.

Event 3: girls 8 and under medley: DQ for alternating kick on fly
Event 4:boys 8 and under medley: Dq for alternating kick on breast, and two dqs for early relay take off.
Event 5: girls 9-10 medley: two dqs for early relay take off.

That doesn't mean that kids weren't worried about it, but no dqs for it



Curious if there were disproportionate DQs in lanes 1 and 6 for technical violations. The officials likely also learned about the tape right before the meet and probably paid extra attention to those lanes on turns and finishes, which is counter to stroke and turn protocol of equal scanning of lanes in your jurisdiction vs. focusing too much on one lane and being more likely to catch a technical violation.

At the end of the day, who cares, but the green tape was a poorly communicated and unusual curve ball for all involved.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The comments about the wall causing DQ's made me curious, so I looked up the DQs from last night to see how many there were for the issue.

Zero.

No teams dqed for that.

Event 3: girls 8 and under medley: DQ for alternating kick on fly
Event 4:boys 8 and under medley: Dq for alternating kick on breast, and two dqs for early relay take off.
Event 5: girls 9-10 medley: two dqs for early relay take off.

That doesn't mean that kids weren't worried about it, but no dqs for it



Where can one find these DQs? Is there a way to find them for anyone (not a data person) on the NVSL site? If so, is that information also available for dual meets?


It's in the ASR folder on NVSL Site: https://www.mynvsl.com/file/36577/ASR_2024_Meet_Results_pdf
They also post after IAS.

For dual meets team reps receive official results and they will list DQ but don't always have the reason.

And looks like Event 3: KG did get a DQ for "other" which to be this weird lane thing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The comments about the wall causing DQ's made me curious, so I looked up the DQs from last night to see how many there were for the issue.

Zero.

No teams dqed for that.

Event 3: girls 8 and under medley: DQ for alternating kick on fly
Event 4:boys 8 and under medley: Dq for alternating kick on breast, and two dqs for early relay take off.
Event 5: girls 9-10 medley: two dqs for early relay take off.

That doesn't mean that kids weren't worried about it, but no dqs for it



Where can one find these DQs? Is there a way to find them for anyone (not a data person) on the NVSL site? If so, is that information also available for dual meets?


It's in the ASR folder on NVSL Site: https://www.mynvsl.com/file/36577/ASR_2024_Meet_Results_pdf
They also post after IAS.

For dual meets team reps receive official results and they will list DQ but don't always have the reason.

And looks like Event 3: KG did get a DQ for "other" which to be this weird lane thing.


The team reps get a carbon copy of the DQ sheet. A box indicating the reason has to be checked
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The comments about the wall causing DQ's made me curious, so I looked up the DQs from last night to see how many there were for the issue.

Zero.

No teams dqed for that.

Event 3: girls 8 and under medley: DQ for alternating kick on fly
Event 4:boys 8 and under medley: Dq for alternating kick on breast, and two dqs for early relay take off.
Event 5: girls 9-10 medley: two dqs for early relay take off.

That doesn't mean that kids weren't worried about it, but no dqs for it



Where can one find these DQs? Is there a way to find them for anyone (not a data person) on the NVSL site? If so, is that information also available for dual meets?


It's in the ASR folder on NVSL Site: https://www.mynvsl.com/file/36577/ASR_2024_Meet_Results_pdf
They also post after IAS.

For dual meets team reps receive official results and they will list DQ but don't always have the reason.

And looks like Event 3: KG did get a DQ for "other" which to be this weird lane thing.


The team reps get a carbon copy of the DQ sheet. A box indicating the reason has to be checked


correct but the reason isn't always listed on the meet results like for AS events.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

How did they find out about this? Was it at the mandatory coaches meeting before the meet?

It is really shocking that this wasn't mentioned or clearly outlined in the pre-meet guides.


Yes, first mention was at the 3:45 meeting. Team Reps were told about the meeting at 3:00pm. They also did not have the pool set up with lane lines for pool familiarization, so there was no opportunity for teams to even see that it was an issue ahead of time. How is this not an issue at every meet Rutherford hosts?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

How did they find out about this? Was it at the mandatory coaches meeting before the meet?

It is really shocking that this wasn't mentioned or clearly outlined in the pre-meet guides.


Yes, first mention was at the 3:45 meeting. Team Reps were told about the meeting at 3:00pm. They also did not have the pool set up with lane lines for pool familiarization, so there was no opportunity for teams to even see that it was an issue ahead of time. How is this not an issue at every meet Rutherford hosts?


My kids are in the same B meet group with Rutherford, and I've been a stroke and turn judge at B meets at Rutherford maybe 4 or 5 times, and I don't remember ever being told anything about the lanes. And it wasn't in the pre-meet info for ASR. My guess is that someone at one of the hyper competitive top division teams noticed the wall curve and brought it up as an unfair advantage.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The comments about the wall causing DQ's made me curious, so I looked up the DQs from last night to see how many there were for the issue.

Zero.

No teams dqed for that.

Event 3: girls 8 and under medley: DQ for alternating kick on fly
Event 4:boys 8 and under medley: Dq for alternating kick on breast, and two dqs for early relay take off.
Event 5: girls 9-10 medley: two dqs for early relay take off.

That doesn't mean that kids weren't worried about it, but no dqs for it



You missed one: Event 3 8 and under medley Kent Gardens DQ for "other"

and others have mentioned that their swimmers were very stressed about this during their races.


My daughter (lead off back in lane 1) learned this from another swimmer. She didn’t understand what they meant and heard “don’t touch the wall or side in lane 1.” She’s experienced and older, yet flipped out so much about it that she said she swam slow so she wouldn’t come anywhere close to the side. She added 2+ seconds. This whole meet was a debacle, much because of the heat and water temps (nobody can change but someone should have advised Rutherford to state throwing in ice and adding cold water that morning).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The comments about the wall causing DQ's made me curious, so I looked up the DQs from last night to see how many there were for the issue.

Zero.

No teams dqed for that.

Event 3: girls 8 and under medley: DQ for alternating kick on fly
Event 4:boys 8 and under medley: Dq for alternating kick on breast, and two dqs for early relay take off.
Event 5: girls 9-10 medley: two dqs for early relay take off.

That doesn't mean that kids weren't worried about it, but no dqs for it



Where can one find these DQs? Is there a way to find them for anyone (not a data person) on the NVSL site? If so, is that information also available for dual meets?


It's in the ASR folder on NVSL Site: https://www.mynvsl.com/file/36577/ASR_2024_Meet_Results_pdf
They also post after IAS.

For dual meets team reps receive official results and they will list DQ but don't always have the reason.

And looks like Event 3: KG did get a DQ for "other" which to be this weird lane thing.


From the livestream recording (which can still be viewed), it doesn't look like KG had any issue with the wall. So DQ was likely something else.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The comments about the wall causing DQ's made me curious, so I looked up the DQs from last night to see how many there were for the issue.

Zero.

No teams dqed for that.

Event 3: girls 8 and under medley: DQ for alternating kick on fly
Event 4:boys 8 and under medley: Dq for alternating kick on breast, and two dqs for early relay take off.
Event 5: girls 9-10 medley: two dqs for early relay take off.

That doesn't mean that kids weren't worried about it, but no dqs for it



Where can one find these DQs? Is there a way to find them for anyone (not a data person) on the NVSL site? If so, is that information also available for dual meets?


It's in the ASR folder on NVSL Site: https://www.mynvsl.com/file/36577/ASR_2024_Meet_Results_pdf
They also post after IAS.

For dual meets team reps receive official results and they will list DQ but don't always have the reason.

And looks like Event 3: KG did get a DQ for "other" which to be this weird lane thing.


From the livestream recording (which can still be viewed), it doesn't look like KG had any issue with the wall. So DQ was likely something else.


Not sure how you came to this conclusion. They were in lane 1 so had the weird edge on their start side which you can’t even see on the live stream. That entire corner/section is out of view on the video. If they had DQd for something else it would say so like for all the other DQs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No lights. And weird rules about lanes 1 and 6 and dqing if you went outside some boundary line. I appreciate Rutherford hosting. Nice field. But.. the pool area and pool were pretty rough.


My kid was a Lane 6 swimmer, and they were STRESSED about that boundary line. The backstroke kid alone added probably 3 seconds to their time over their seed time.


Same here. 9-10 girl. Ended up on the lane line on other side of the lane because they were so scared of DQing. This whole thing was ridiculous. The young kids were so stressed out.


Coaches were informed at 3:45 PM. Meet started at 4 PM. Right before clerking, kids got a scary speech about staying inside the green tape. Rutherford was an awesome host (thank you!), but the timing of this update was not ideal.


Agreed. Just wrote the same thing about my daughter, who learned about this thing from an 8 year old, so it wasn’t even accurate and just caused more stress and incorrect overcorrection.
Anonymous
I can confirm KG was DQ’d because they “touched the tape.” There is no competitive advantage gained by touching tape so this DQ is senseless. The easy and right thing to do here is to rescind it and give the girls their ribbons. This is about the kids after all. Go dolphins!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I can confirm KG was DQ’d because they “touched the tape.” There is no competitive advantage gained by touching tape so this DQ is senseless. The easy and right thing to do here is to rescind it and give the girls their ribbons. This is about the kids after all. Go dolphins!!


I’m sorry this happened to them and I hope NVSL will do the right thing. What a terrible thing to do to little kids.

post reply Forum Index » Swimming and Diving
Message Quick Reply
Go to: