Stanford dean of DEI attacks invited speaker, Judge Kyle Duncan

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:President and Dean apologized to the judge.

What about the Dean of DEI? Why is she still employed, or even allowed on campus?

Yes. She is still employed. And, the snowflake student activists haven't stopped.
What it will take to make a change is for the wealthy alumni who donate millions to step up and insist that Stanford grow a pair.

Thread:

Just disgusting. I certainly hope Martinez doesn’t apologize and grovel to these entitled ahole students.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:President and Dean apologized to the judge.

What about the Dean of DEI? Why is she still employed, or even allowed on campus?

Some students who are advocates of free speech penned an opinion piece in the Stanford newspaper... the Stanford Review.
Good to know there are at least some students there who understand what free speech means.

https://stanfordreview.org/fire-tirien-steinbach/

Yes, that is heartening to read. Hopefully, the dean will be fired. Good to know there are some people at Stanford who found the spectacle she helped create - and encouraged - to be absolutely shameful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will someone please explain what in the actual hell is going on at these so-called "elite" law schools? After seeing the way students - and now administrators - shut down conservative speakers, I am completely revolted. Especially at institutions that supposedly pride themselves on being "bastions of free speech and open debate." What utter BS. I sincerely hope the attention-seeking, loudmouth dean, Tirien Steinbach, is fired - though I know she won't be. There is no free speech going on here.

https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/crybullies-at-stanford-law-school-threaten-free-speech/

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/trump-appointed-judge-wants-stanford-apologize-disrupted-speech-2023-03-11/

Pshaw. We did back in the 80s. I remember the guy who did the "studies" that showed black people had smaller inferior brains being shut down from speaking on many campuses back during the dark ages. You really dont know anything about history.

Go crawl back in your hole. If you really believed in free speech, you would be condemning those who seek to silence views they disagree with.
DP

[Anonymous]

Not a good look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not a good look.

There is no such thing as a perfect victim.

[Anonymous]

Another conservative snowflake who can dish it out but can’t take it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 5th Circuit is a highly partisan court and this is a highly partisan man. My take on this is that this event was planned and orchestrated to elicit exactly this reaction. This Judge was a member of the Federalist Society when he was nominated to the bench. He was confirmed because he will render the sort of opinions that the Federalist society wants, which are against what the majority of the country wants. It's minority rule over the majority and the majority is well-aware.

I graduated law school in '98 and if this had happened back then I would have been appalled. But 25 years later it's pretty clear what the score is. This is people telling those in power they see through them and making their voice heard.

Then they should never have extended an invitation to him if the plan was not to let him speak.

+ 1 million

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 5th Circuit is a highly partisan court and this is a highly partisan man. My take on this is that this event was planned and orchestrated to elicit exactly this reaction. This Judge was a member of the Federalist Society when he was nominated to the bench. He was confirmed because he will render the sort of opinions that the Federalist society wants, which are against what the majority of the country wants. It's minority rule over the majority and the majority is well-aware.

I graduated law school in '98 and if this had happened back then I would have been appalled. But 25 years later it's pretty clear what the score is. This is people telling those in power they see through them and making their voice heard.

Then they should never have extended an invitation to him if the plan was not to let him speak.

+ 1 million

The video I watched concluded with him being able to speak. Why didn’t he speak?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Part of the problem is that judges have become a complete disgrace.

Thanks for that, Donald Trump.

No, this has nothing to do with judges and everything to do with campus climate.

Are abortion rights activists welcome to speak at conservative Christian colleges? Campus climate!

Obama spoke at Notre Dame at their commencement.

Obama is not an abortion rights activist.

He said marriage is between a man and a woman. And that abortion was not top priority for him, even though he ran on codifying Roe

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So funny to me that people are defending this student conduct.

Back in the 90’s when I was at university, this student conduct would have been unthinkable.

I did not grow up in America so I do not know what was acceptable in 90’s, but always thought Stanford accepted the smartest and brightest people in the country. Now seeing this video made me realize I could actually have a shot to be a Stanford student. I am a hot tempered, very opinionated, sometimes call people names just to win an argument and raise my voice often. My English sucks but I check all the right boxes the universities are looking for.

It's just the law schools not accepting the best and brightest. Almost all of legal academia teaches critical race theory in their classes so it shouldn't be shocking to see the students engaged in extreme behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:President and Dean apologized to the judge.

What about the Dean of DEI? Why is she still employed, or even allowed on campus?

Yes. She is still employed. And, the snowflake student activists haven't stopped.
What it will take to make a change is for the wealthy alumni who donate millions to step up and insist that Stanford grow a pair.

Thread:

Just disgusting. I certainly hope Martinez doesn’t apologize and grovel to these entitled ahole students.

Martinez has nothing to apologize for. She issued a DEI statement with wishy-washy language promising nothing would be done. Apparently the DEI admin have more power than the top administration at law schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:President and Dean apologized to the judge.

What about the Dean of DEI? Why is she still employed, or even allowed on campus?

Yes. She is still employed. And, the snowflake student activists haven't stopped.
What it will take to make a change is for the wealthy alumni who donate millions to step up and insist that Stanford grow a pair.

Thread:

Just disgusting. I certainly hope Martinez doesn’t apologize and grovel to these entitled ahole students.

Martinez has nothing to apologize for. She issued a DEI statement with wishy-washy language promising nothing would be done. Apparently the DEI admin have more power than the top administration at law schools.

This reflects the consumption model of higher education. Customer is always right. Students are the customer. Makes sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So funny to me that people are defending this student conduct.

Back in the 90’s when I was at university, this student conduct would have been unthinkable.

I did not grow up in America so I do not know what was acceptable in 90’s, but always thought Stanford accepted the smartest and brightest people in the country. Now seeing this video made me realize I could actually have a shot to be a Stanford student. I am a hot tempered, very opinionated, sometimes call people names just to win an argument and raise my voice often. My English sucks but I check all the right boxes the universities are looking for.

It's just the law schools not accepting the best and brightest. Almost all of legal academia teaches critical race theory in their classes so it shouldn't be shocking to see the students engaged in extreme behavior.

Yikes! Conservatives are always the victims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So funny to me that people are defending this student conduct.

Back in the 90’s when I was at university, this student conduct would have been unthinkable.

I did not grow up in America so I do not know what was acceptable in 90’s, but always thought Stanford accepted the smartest and brightest people in the country. Now seeing this video made me realize I could actually have a shot to be a Stanford student. I am a hot tempered, very opinionated, sometimes call people names just to win an argument and raise my voice often. My English sucks but I check all the right boxes the universities are looking for.

It's just the law schools not accepting the best and brightest. Almost all of legal academia teaches critical race theory in their classes so it shouldn't be shocking to see the students engaged in extreme behavior.

Yikes! Conservatives are always the victims.

At least they aren’t the ones protesting for pedophiles. That’s a new low.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So funny to me that people are defending this student conduct.

Back in the 90’s when I was at university, this student conduct would have been unthinkable.

I did not grow up in America so I do not know what was acceptable in 90’s, but always thought Stanford accepted the smartest and brightest people in the country. Now seeing this video made me realize I could actually have a shot to be a Stanford student. I am a hot tempered, very opinionated, sometimes call people names just to win an argument and raise my voice often. My English sucks but I check all the right boxes the universities are looking for.

It's just the law schools not accepting the best and brightest. Almost all of legal academia teaches critical race theory in their classes so it shouldn't be shocking to see the students engaged in extreme behavior.

Yikes! Conservatives are always the victims.

At least they aren’t the ones protesting for pedophiles. That’s a new low.

Minor-Attracted People*