Of course, I can tell you mean this. Of course, if one expressed these views, it would be considered to be impugning on someone else’s experience. The purpose of these conversations is to keep the masses focused on these “issues”. Keep the plebes of society fighting amongst themselves and they’ll look to their royalty for solutions - instead of pointing to them to identify the problem. |
Ah well, at least your boomer white boss isn’t trying to do DEI training himself like this guy from DoD. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/01/20/opm-doug-glenn-pentagon-watchdog-report/ |
Assuming you know what other people deal with suggests that you need this training. |
|
This DEI thing has spawned a whole industry of charlatans. There is no science behind any of this, and no evidence that it improves any outcomes or enhances integration. Instead, it draws attention to differences, wastes everyone’s time, and diverts a bunch of money to corporate parasites that could be spent on wages.
We all know it. |
|
At the large (Fortune 100) corporation where I work, this is a huge priority and we receive constant updates from management on this.
It seems off to me to constantly discuss race, especially at work. But it is the new normal. |
PP here. I meant to say that this corporation is a very professional environment, and I believe people are always treated properly. The workforce is very diverse from top to bottom. And so this seems kind of unnecessary to constantly discuss race all of a sudden. |
This. I'm a white woman but married to a minority, which many of my colleagues don't know. It's astounding the number of casual comments I hear that are discriminatory, slurs, or just plain rude because they don't think before they speak--and that's clearly what they think or feel or whatever. |
| I don't mind the idea of doing DEI work at work. However, I am really, really overworked. If the workplace wants people to do DEI work at work, then they have to make some reduction in other work required. People should not be doing their regular work at home so that they can fit in DEI as well. I see this as part of a larger issue of the workplace demanding more and more of workers. |
It was a softball question (NP). I mentally answered it as I was reading it. But we don't know what kind of a response they were looking for. |
Then why not have training that focuses more on real-life examples of these types of comments? Explain what crap your non-white/gay/whatever colleagues are dealing with in the workplace. For training to be worthwhile, there must be concrete examples and solutions that people can use, stated in language that everyone understands (not using terms that multiple groups define or understand differently). What is the solution if punctuality and other professionalism standards privilege whiteness? Should everyone in the office come and go as they please? How do you develop or reconfigure personal and workplace standards to be more inclusive yet still meet the expectations and demands of clients or other stakeholders? My issue with much of this training and the scholarship is that simply pointing out problems without offering solutions has little impact. |
|
if timelines = white supremacy, then anyone wearing a watch is practically a Nazi. Let's all ditch our work schedules, class schedules and any expectation of meeting your colleague, doctor or hairstylist at a specific time. Only then can we be a racially harmonious society.
Is Stanford going to lead the way on this? |
|
*timeliness
|
It isn’t all of a sudden. Its necessity was catalyzed after George Floyd was murdered by racist cops in Minnesota and the BLM movement in exploded. |
|
Men in the 90s rolled their eyes at "sexual misconduct" training as well. Yes after decades, some of it has seeped in. Some.
If it makes you uncomfortable, THAT'S THE POINT. |
And that’s also the point of embedding equity discussions in K-12. We ARE trying to make your white children uncomfortable. That’s how they learn. |