The answer has always been “yes” People are just too pc to say it |
|
The crazy thing about Scott is that he actually has one of the best staff’s on the GOP side in the Senate and has a very smart campaign staff. Really smart people who know how government works, lots of former lobbyists & think tank folks who have subject matter expertise on banking, energy, defense, etc.
Like, he’s actually really well respected as a principled-conservative-who-won’t-stage-a-coup by professional Conservative Inc foot soldiers who went to good schools and couldn’t stand Trump. Which, of course, just complicates everything and almost assures he won’t win the nomination. |
You're painting him an as insider puppet. Sure, DC may love this kind of candidate..but yeah, this ain't gonna get it done. |
| Why do they care he's single? It's never bothered them about Lyndsay |
It was an issue for Lindsey's short presidential candidacy as well. |
|
It's disappointing that in this day and age anyone still cares about whether a candidate is gay/straight/asexual or whatever and that they have to trot out a partner or family to enhance their image. It is what it is.... |
Well that is a Republican concern. The Dems are not nearly as focused on such issues. Where are the gay republicans? The first openly gay republicans elected to Congress is George Santos. And is a known liar and con-artist. Is he actually gay anyway? Everything he says is a lie so that could well be a lie as well. |
It was a Democrat concern for Corey Booker as well, and he did the same thing that Tim Scott is doing now. |
“Rosario Dawson” 😂 |
Again. Where are these national gay republican elected officials? Is the pathetic joke of a representative, George Santos all you got? |
Maybe Republicans aren't as consumed with identity politics and tabulating? |
Maybe they won't elect gay people is more like it. |
It's not 1990. |
It’s 1960 in the Republican primary |