Ok DCUMs - which one of you was this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s been a few days and she hasn’t been identified.

If she were a student, someone would have id’d her.

If she had a job, someone would have id’d her.

My guess is she’s mentally ill and on SSDI. She lives under the radar—potentially on the street.

Or she’s not from around her. Surely neighbors would identify her.

The driver should know her identify. Why hasn’t he identified her?

Maybe she’s the daughter of someone wealthy who paid him off?

[Anonymous]

Surely someone recognizes her.

It’s strange that she hasn’t been identified.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s been a few days and she hasn’t been identified.

If she were a student, someone would have id’d her.

If she had a job, someone would have id’d her.

My guess is she’s mentally ill and on SSDI. She lives under the radar—potentially on the street.

Or she’s not from around her. Surely neighbors would identify her.

The driver should know her identify. Why hasn’t he identified her?

Does Uber show drivers their passengers first and last name?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s been a few days and she hasn’t been identified.

If she were a student, someone would have id’d her.

If she had a job, someone would have id’d her.

My guess is she’s mentally ill and on SSDI. She lives under the radar—potentially on the street.

Or she’s not from around her. Surely neighbors would identify her.

The driver should know her identify. Why hasn’t he identified her?

Maybe she’s the daughter of someone wealthy who paid him off?

He also shooed away the police when they came. So it is clear that he knows more that is not being shared.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s been a few days and she hasn’t been identified.

If she were a student, someone would have id’d her.

If she had a job, someone would have id’d her.

My guess is she’s mentally ill and on SSDI. She lives under the radar—potentially on the street.

Or she’s not from around her. Surely neighbors would identify her.

The driver should know her identify. Why hasn’t he identified her?

Does Uber show drivers their passengers first and last name?

No, just first name. Not sure why everyone is saying the driver knows who she is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Surely someone recognizes her.

It’s strange that she hasn’t been identified.

This makes me think she is not from a major city in the US. No one in her home town is spending their days surfing Twitter, DCUM, and all the other sites where this story has appeared.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Surely someone recognizes her.

It’s strange that she hasn’t been identified.

This makes me think she is not from a major city in the US. No one in her home town is spending their days surfing Twitter, DCUM, and all the other sites where this story has appeared.

And she doesn’t work.

And she doesn’t have neighbors.

And she doesn’t have former classmates.

It’s like she’s a ghost.

Maybe she’s a spy?

[Anonymous]

I bet she’s someone in from out of town visiting and her relative is beyond mortified and won’t ID her and has probably already sent her home.

Also don’t the Uber rules prohibit the drivers from releasing the name/info of passengers? I would guess there are restrictions on that. Sometimes people also use other people’s accounts. If she was visiting from out of town she may have used her relative’s Uber account.

[Anonymous]

Im so sorry to tell her she is not white. Neither am I. Why would she delude herself. Shes not homeless. I have gomeless looking hair too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Im so sorry to tell her she is not white. Neither am I. Why would she delude herself. Shes not homeless. I have gomeless looking hair too.

I agree. I don’t think people who are homeless use Uber. The DCUM sleuths are off on this one

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Im so sorry to tell her she is not white. Neither am I. Why would she delude herself. Shes not homeless. I have gomeless looking hair too.

I agree. I don’t think people who are homeless use Uber. The DCUM sleuths are off on this one

+1
She is very much a DC person who is not homeless. So much denial on this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Im so sorry to tell her she is not white. Neither am I. Why would she delude herself. Shes not homeless. I have gomeless looking hair too.

I agree. I don’t think people who are homeless use Uber. The DCUM sleuths are off on this one

+1
She is very much a DC person who is not homeless. So much denial on this thread.

How do we know she is a DC person? Was she identified?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s been a few days and she hasn’t been identified.

If she were a student, someone would have id’d her.

If she had a job, someone would have id’d her.

My guess is she’s mentally ill and on SSDI. She lives under the radar—potentially on the street.

Or she’s not from around her. Surely neighbors would identify her.

The driver should know her identify. Why hasn’t he identified her?

Maybe she’s the daughter of someone wealthy who paid him off?

He also shooed away the police when they came. So it is clear that he knows more that is not being shared.

I saw a few posters (or perhaps the same poster repeating this) say this; where did you hear/see him shooing the cops away?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I bet she’s someone in from out of town visiting and her relative is beyond mortified and won’t ID her and has probably already sent her home.

Also don’t the Uber rules prohibit the drivers from releasing the name/info of passengers? I would guess there are restrictions on that. Sometimes people also use other people’s accounts. If she was visiting from out of town she may have used her relative’s Uber account.

Agreed. There’s a lot of UK expats in this area of Glover Park, Cathédral Heights, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His view afterwards. She seems maybe Indian with a British accent. She claims she’s white.

She’s deplorable.

This video from his point of view shows her trying to walk away, and him antagonizing her and calling her names first.

Because he's called the police and he wants her to stay and be arrested. He's also not letting her have the last word. Immature or not, he's trying to get as much content as possible on his phone. And it worked. Here we are watching it. By doing this, he's outting her for people to see.
Think about all the stuff we don't see.

Agree. He didn’t know the first video was beeping recorded upstairs so he made sure he got her despicable behavior on camera. I can’t believe anyone would even attempt to make her behavior rationale or turn this into whataboutism. I can actually. Sadly.

I’m surprised it’s been 48 hours and she still hasn’t been outed. Twitter detectives must have taken Thanksgiving off.

Absolutely NO ONE has said her behavior was rational. But further provoking an irrational person, is also not "rational."

At least 6 people have placed blame on him and not her.

This is an anonymous forum--those "6 people" could have been just 1 person posting multiple times.

And I don't know that anyone has placed blame on him and not her---I am a pp that has placed blame on both of them. She said horrible things that she shouldn't have said. He said horrible things that he shouldn't have said. We have seen video tape of her trying to walk away as he follows her and screams insults at her.

Her clothes, her hair, and most importantly her words/actions show that she was not mentally healthy during that video--and yet he continues after her.

You can tell all that from a ponytail and clothes?