Bannon indicted

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did they really just poke the bear for a misdemeanor? Dummies

It shows a troubling lack of discipline. Bannon just became a martyr for 2022 and 2024. 10 million Americans listen to his podcast. That's 20 times the viewership that CNN has. Democrats don't understand how much of the country works any more.

It goes beyond that - Posobiec has a huge following, as does Kassam and Navarro. Posobiec brings in Lao Baixing by the millions.

Are you saying it's a bad idea to hold criminals accountable when they have large social media followings? I don't know who Lao Baixing is but I find this post to be a weird attempt at intimidation.

You're saying don't go after him or we'll REALLY regret it, I take it? Like worse than Jan 6?

All that’s being said is Pelosi and crew are picking a fight with someone over a misdemeanor who is ready for the fight. Bannon is not one to be intimidated. I would have picked someone weaker to try and intimidate. No one is after physical violence of any sort. It’s psychological warfare. Having a large following means that they will have to be very politically careful regarding how far they want to push things over a misdemeanor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did they really just poke the bear for a misdemeanor? Dummies

It shows a troubling lack of discipline. Bannon just became a martyr for 2022 and 2024. 10 million Americans listen to his podcast. That's 20 times the viewership that CNN has. Democrats don't understand how much of the country works any more.

It goes beyond that - Posobiec has a huge following, as does Kassam and Navarro. Posobiec brings in Lao Baixing by the millions.

Are you saying it's a bad idea to hold criminals accountable when they have large social media followings? I don't know who Lao Baixing is but I find this post to be a weird attempt at intimidation.

You're saying don't go after him or we'll REALLY regret it, I take it? Like worse than Jan 6?

All that’s being said is Pelosi and crew are picking a fight with someone over a misdemeanor who is ready for the fight. Bannon is not one to be intimidated. I would have picked someone weaker to try and intimidate. No one is after physical violence of any sort. It’s psychological warfare. Having a large following means that they will have to be very politically careful regarding how far they want to push things over a misdemeanor.

Blowing off Congress has been par for the course for the past four (five) years. But why should that continue? Because someone has a podcast?

Congress should be more afraid of a guy with a podcast than they should have been on January 6? That's the world you live in?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did they really just poke the bear for a misdemeanor? Dummies

It shows a troubling lack of discipline. Bannon just became a martyr for 2022 and 2024. 10 million Americans listen to his podcast. That's 20 times the viewership that CNN has. Democrats don't understand how much of the country works any more.

It goes beyond that - Posobiec has a huge following, as does Kassam and Navarro. Posobiec brings in Lao Baixing by the millions.

Are you saying it's a bad idea to hold criminals accountable when they have large social media followings? I don't know who Lao Baixing is but I find this post to be a weird attempt at intimidation.

You're saying don't go after him or we'll REALLY regret it, I take it? Like worse than Jan 6?

All that’s being said is Pelosi and crew are picking a fight with someone over a misdemeanor who is ready for the fight. Bannon is not one to be intimidated. I would have picked someone weaker to try and intimidate. No one is after physical violence of any sort. It’s psychological warfare. Having a large following means that they will have to be very politically careful regarding how far they want to push things over a misdemeanor.

Blowing off Congress has been par for the course for the past four (five) years. But why should that continue? Because someone has a podcast?

Congress should be more afraid of a guy with a podcast than they should have been on January 6? That's the world you live in?

Is the committee interested in the truth or a narrative?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did they really just poke the bear for a misdemeanor? Dummies

It shows a troubling lack of discipline. Bannon just became a martyr for 2022 and 2024. 10 million Americans listen to his podcast. That's 20 times the viewership that CNN has. Democrats don't understand how much of the country works any more.

It goes beyond that - Posobiec has a huge following, as does Kassam and Navarro. Posobiec brings in Lao Baixing by the millions.

Are you saying it's a bad idea to hold criminals accountable when they have large social media followings? I don't know who Lao Baixing is but I find this post to be a weird attempt at intimidation.

You're saying don't go after him or we'll REALLY regret it, I take it? Like worse than Jan 6?

All that’s being said is Pelosi and crew are picking a fight with someone over a misdemeanor who is ready for the fight. Bannon is not one to be intimidated. I would have picked someone weaker to try and intimidate. No one is after physical violence of any sort. It’s psychological warfare. Having a large following means that they will have to be very politically careful regarding how far they want to push things over a misdemeanor.

Blowing off Congress has been par for the course for the past four (five) years. But why should that continue? Because someone has a podcast?

Congress should be more afraid of a guy with a podcast than they should have been on January 6? That's the world you live in?

Is the committee interested in the truth or a narrative?

Go back to sleep, friend. You don't believe any of it anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bannon helped plan the insurrection with the White House

Yes, that’s what they want him to testify about.
Bannon and Flynn are about equal - and both are very very bad. They were both indicted for crimes and then pardoned by Trump. In contrast to another PP, I think it’s Bannon who is the grifter, while Flynn is a true believer and basically crazy at this point. YMMV.

NP here. That's interesting. I basically think the opposite. Isn't Bannon really rich from some media empire or something?

PP here, this popped up in my feed today, it’s old but I read it a while back and it influenced my view that Bannon is a grifter. Also, his stealing all that money from the build the wall people.
https://cafe.com/preets-note/note-from-preet-i-have-met-steve-bannon-twice/

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Bannon's 100 year old father died last week. I just read the big obituary in the Richmond Times. Obituaries are interesting since they list family connections in case anyone goes on the lam. I hope this means Stephen will never come to Richmond again. I wonder if he will bathe and put on three clean shirts for the funeral?

https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/timesdispatch/name/martin-bannon-obituary?id=32549286

[Anonymous]

Bannon’s motion to dismiss failed today. Trial in July.

Also, I love this guy.

[Anonymous]

Jury selection begins today:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/07/16/steve-bannon-trial-jan6/

[Anonymous]

Bannon is a wind bag. He belongs in jail for trying to overthrow the government.

[Anonymous]

Cameras are outside his DC house! This is really happening ….

[Anonymous]

So why has trump not issued a pardon for Bannon? Trump waved executive privilege even though he is out of office. By that logic he should be able to issue pardons while out of office.
If trump did that it would delay proceedings for at least two years while the case was slow walked to the Supreme Court by republicans judges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So why has trump not issued a pardon for Bannon? Trump waved executive privilege even though he is out of office. By that logic he should be able to issue pardons while out of office.
If trump did that it would delay proceedings for at least two years while the case was slow walked to the Supreme Court by republicans judges.

Maybe because a pardoned person can no longer plead the fifth.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

I always think of this when I think of Bannon.

https://www.businessinsider.com/steve-bannon-banned-twitter-fauci-and-wrays-heads-on-pikes-2020-11