Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

It doesn’t matter if Brett stood up on the table at the hearing and dropped his pants. The GOP - and Trump - have already sold their souls to the devil for this SCOTUS seat. They are ALL IN. No backing out now.

I think the Dems have sold their souls to the devil for this smear campaign.

It's going to be interesting as to how they use the same playbook against a woman.

They can get some tips from the GOP who has been running a smear campaign against one particular woman for decades.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

It doesn’t matter if Brett stood up on the table at the hearing and dropped his pants. The GOP - and Trump - have already sold their souls to the devil for this SCOTUS seat. They are ALL IN. No backing out now.

I agree.

And the GOP will lay for the sins of these old white men.

They will lay in November and they will lay in the years ahead when they are replaced by young women who won’t put up with their misogyny and their dirty tricks and their candidates and nominees who sexually abuse women.

The GOP should be very afraid. There will be political consequences for supporting a man who abuses women.

[Anonymous]

PAY!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
1. Lied under oath? According to who? Twitter and the liberal press? Yeah. Good luck with that.

He said before Congress under oath, "

Kavanaugh told Congress he heard of the Ramirez allegation *after September 23*—when according to NBC, we now have *text messages proving* that that was a lie.

ORRIN HATCH: When did you first hear of [Deborah] Ramirez’s allegations against you?

KAVANAUGH: In the last — in the period since then, the New Yorker story.

(Sept 23)

In a series of texts before the publication of the New Yorker story, Yarasavage wrote that she had been in contact with “Brett’s guy,” and also with “Brett,” who wanted her to go on the record to refute Ramirez. According to Berchem, Yarasavage also told her friend that she turned over a copy of the wedding party photo to Kavanaugh, writing in a text: “I had to send it to Brett’s team too.”

….The texts show Kavanaugh may need to be questioned about how far back he anticipated that Ramirez would air allegations against him. Berchem says in her memo that Kavanaugh “and/or” his friends “may have initiated an anticipatory narrative” as early as July to “conceal or discredit” Ramirez.

The preceeding information can be verified through an FBI investigation of texts, emails and phone records.

If true, Kavanaugh knew about the Ramirez allegation as early as July and therefore life under oath.

Perjury.

Here's the problem with this. There are actual legal allegations and there is catching wind of a rumor and trying to figure out whether or not what you are hearing is true, i.e. that someone is trying to find dirt on you.

From Webster: specifically : a statement by a party to a legal action of what the party undertakes to prove

Kavanaugh is a lawyer and a judge, and was referring to the actual legal definition of allegation when he gave the date.

^^hoo-buddy! you are really grasping at the tiniest straws here with this argument. Come on now, this ludicrous.

Plus a million. What liars we have here in the Brett or Bust Club! And they lie with such confidence. Or shamelessness.

To be honest? I could've cared less whether the judge was Kavanaugh or another conservative. The reason I am defending him now is because these tactics on the left cannot stand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I think the Dems have sold their souls to the devil for this smear campaign.

Other way around.

The Republicans have sold their souls repeatedly. Evidence will show that they knew about the allegations against Kavanaugh very early on and ignored it for some reason -- they wanted him on the Supreme Court so desperately they were willing to cover up that they knew about it and didn't care.

Vile and disgusting. Kavanaugh is no choir boy and wasn't back then.

I am so disgusted with the Democrats and the posters here defending this obvious smear campaign that I'm about to lose my breakfast.

It’s not Democrats you should be disgusted at. It’s Kavanaugh himself.

Or the GOP who willingly covers it up. And frankly they don’t care what he did as long as he gets the seat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I think the Dems have sold their souls to the devil for this smear campaign.

Other way around.

The Republicans have sold their souls repeatedly. Evidence will show that they knew about the allegations against Kavanaugh very early on and ignored it for some reason -- they wanted him on the Supreme Court so desperately they were willing to cover up that they knew about it and didn't care.

Vile and disgusting. Kavanaugh is no choir boy and wasn't back then.

I am so disgusted with the Democrats and the posters here defending this obvious smear campaign that I'm about to lose my breakfast.

Too much beer with your Cheerios? Join the GOP Ralph Club!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

1. Lied under oath? According to who? Twitter and the liberal press? Yeah. Good luck with that.
2. Belligerent drunk? Seriously? And, this was never revealed during his 6 FBI background investigations? Again, good luck with that.
3. Alcoholic? LOL - refer to #2

This is pure desperation.

Belligerent drunk - did you see the article about the bar fight? There is a police report.
Did you note the statements of former roommates and classmates who indicate he was a belligerent drunk?
The lies? Not going to waste my time retyping them all here. There are plenty of articles out there now dissecting that. https://www.gq.com/story/all-of-brett-kavanaughs-lies

Bart O Kavanaugh has a long, documented history of having a drinking problem, and the evidence is mounting by the day. President Trump said yesterday the guy has a drinking problem. Did you see the President's remarks? https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/01/politics/donald-trump-brett-kavanaugh-drinking/index.html


Look, I come from a long line of Irish alcoholics. We are all smart, respectable, hard working accomplished people, and alcoholism runs in our family. It is possible to go to Yale, be very educated and accomplshed, by a nice person and a good parent and *still* have a drinking problem. Alcoholism is the curse of the Irish. That and small penises. https://alcohol.addictionblog.org/why-do-irish-people-drink-a-lot/

ICE!! OMG, HE THREW ICE! Talk to me about the arrest record, not a police report that states he simply threw ice at a guy who was rude to him in a bar.

Speculation isn't becoming. Especially when it's speculation about the size of someone's member. New low, I think.

I’ve had alcohol. I’ve gotten drunk. I’ve never thrown anything at anyone, let alone a stranger, let alone in public. Are you serious in acting like Brett’s conduct was normal? Are you serious in acting like in interviews and testimony, Brett hasn’t acted like he never got wasted enough to act like that? Brawling Brett is worth that much to you, when even the Federaliat Society president thinks all 20+ justices are equally good for their purposes?

What am I missing? Please help!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I think the Dems have sold their souls to the devil for this smear campaign.

Other way around.

The Republicans have sold their souls repeatedly. Evidence will show that they knew about the allegations against Kavanaugh very early on and ignored it for some reason -- they wanted him on the Supreme Court so desperately they were willing to cover up that they knew about it and didn't care.

Vile and disgusting. Kavanaugh is no choir boy and wasn't back then.

I am so disgusted with the Democrats and the posters here defending this obvious smear campaign that I'm about to lose my breakfast.

Breakfast Ralph club - biggest contributor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

1. Lied under oath? According to who? Twitter and the liberal press? Yeah. Good luck with that.
2. Belligerent drunk? Seriously? And, this was never revealed during his 6 FBI background investigations? Again, good luck with that.
3. Alcoholic? LOL - refer to #2

This is pure desperation.

Belligerent drunk - did you see the article about the bar fight? There is a police report.
Did you note the statements of former roommates and classmates who indicate he was a belligerent drunk?
The lies? Not going to waste my time retyping them all here. There are plenty of articles out there now dissecting that. https://www.gq.com/story/all-of-brett-kavanaughs-lies

Bart O Kavanaugh has a long, documented history of having a drinking problem, and the evidence is mounting by the day. President Trump said yesterday the guy has a drinking problem. Did you see the President's remarks? https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/01/politics/donald-trump-brett-kavanaugh-drinking/index.html


Look, I come from a long line of Irish alcoholics. We are all smart, respectable, hard working accomplished people, and alcoholism runs in our family. It is possible to go to Yale, be very educated and accomplshed, by a nice person and a good parent and *still* have a drinking problem. Alcoholism is the curse of the Irish. That and small penises. https://alcohol.addictionblog.org/why-do-irish-people-drink-a-lot/

ICE!! OMG, HE THREW ICE! Talk to me about the arrest record, not a police report that states he simply threw ice at a guy who was rude to him in a bar.

Speculation isn't becoming. Especially when it's speculation about the size of someone's member. New low, I think.

I’ve had alcohol. I’ve gotten drunk. I’ve never thrown anything at anyone, let alone a stranger, let alone in public. Are you serious in acting like Brett’s conduct was normal? Are you serious in acting like in interviews and testimony, Brett hasn’t acted like he never got wasted enough to act like that? Brawling Brett is worth that much to you, when even the Federaliat Society president thinks all 20+ justices are equally good for their purposes?

What am I missing? Please help!

DP here. I am a tee totaler. Rarely drink. And, when I do, it is not much.
In college, I threw a beer in a guys face who wouldn’t leave me alone. He left me alone after that. I wasn’t intoxicated at all.
So, yes, I have thrown something at someone in public.
This is a ridiculous story. And, published in NY Times by the author who wrote the following on Twitter. She has an agenda. And, sadly, she calls herself a journalist. I would say, with great confidence, that journalism has taken a huge hit with this made-up scandal.

Emily Bazelon
?
Verified account

@emilybazelon
Follow Follow @emilybazelon
More
As a @YaleLawSch grad & lecturer, I strongly disassociate myself from tonight’s praise of Brett Kavanaugh. With respect, he’s a 5th vote for a hard-right turn on voting rights and so much more that will harm the democratic process & prevent a more equal society. 1/2
Emily Bazelon
?
Verified account

@emilybazelon
Jul 9
More
Those are fundamental values we try to instill in our students. They matter more than collegiality and credentials. 2/2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

Haven't you been paying attention? Perjury.

He said nothing that perjured himself, he was defending himself from well scripted lies from the left.

The goal is to get him to perjure himself - why do you think the left wants Trump interviewed by FBI so badly? Traps well-set. All you have to do is mis-remember a small detail and there's leverage. But Ford's story is determined to be held together by dust by a well-respected prosecutor, and that's just fine.

“Misremember a small detail”? Have you had you’re head in the sand? Try to catch up if you have any intellectual honesty.

I'm sure there are lots and lots and lots of really big big big things

You wouldn’t care one way or the other. Disgusting.

Not really

Not surprising. I would be surprised though if the deplorables woke up one day and decided to have morals. Not happening today. Or any day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

It doesn’t matter if Brett stood up on the table at the hearing and dropped his pants. The GOP - and Trump - have already sold their souls to the devil for this SCOTUS seat. They are ALL IN. No backing out now.

I agree.

And the GOP will lay for the sins of these old white men.

They will lay in November and they will lay in the years ahead when they are replaced by young women who won’t put up with their misogyny and their dirty tricks and their candidates and nominees who sexually abuse women.

The GOP should be very afraid. There will be political consequences for supporting a man who abuses women.

If your last sentence is true how do you explain the sitting POTUS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alright, looks like the B team has arrived. Are we going to go back and talk about how the music was playing in the room again? Albertsons vs Safeway?

TIRESOME

I hope his nomination gets withdrawn, but I also hope that his house was not actually vandalized. That is unacceptable and I hope the people who did it (if it happened) are brought to justice.

Why should it get withdrawn? None of the accusers have any evidence at all. How would like you like it if someone came out of the blue from 40 yrs ago and made baseless claims against you or one of your male relative just due to political hate for them not being a Democrat. Its sick what the Democrats are doing.

Haven't you been paying attention? Perjury.

He said nothing that perjured himself, he was defending himself from well scripted lies from the left.

The goal is to get him to perjure himself - why do you think the left wants Trump interviewed by FBI so badly? Traps well-set. All you have to do is mis-remember a small detail and there's leverage. But Ford's story is determined to be held together by dust by a well-respected prosecutor, and that's just fine.

“Misremember a small detail”? Have you had you’re head in the sand? Try to catch up if you have any intellectual honesty.

I'm sure there are lots and lots and lots of really big big big things

You wouldn’t care one way or the other. Disgusting.

Not really

Not surprising. I would be surprised though if the deplorables woke up one day and decided to have morals. Not happening today. Or any day.

My morality doesn't involve accusing a man of sexual assault, gang rape, alcoholism and pedophilia without fact. I'm damn proud of that, thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

Trump specifically wanted him because he will be helpful with Mueller. Neither the Federalist Society nor McConnell wanted him. At this point, they are in too deep though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brett had trouble back in 2006, the second time Bush nominates him for Court of Appeals. ABA lowered their rating for him then.

“The group’s judicial investigator had recently interviewed dozens of lawyers, judges and others who had worked with Kavanaugh, the ABA announced at the time, and some of them raised red flags about “his professional experience and the question of his freedom from bias and open-mindedness.””

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/28/american-bar-association-had-kavanaugh-concerns-years-ago-republicans-dismissed-those-too/?utm_term=.34824ec86ca9

He had trouble getting confirmed for the Court of Appeals - had to be nominated twice by his Yale fraternity brother, Bush - because of his conduct, including LYING in court.

The same few papers have been reporting garbage about him for weeks, then having to amend/retract their stories. Why trust a darn thing they say?

You mean sort of like the Washington Times and the Seth Rich story?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see how they can confirm with all this mounting evidence that he lied under oath. It's not about the sexual assault anymore. That would be a "he said, she said" and it's not possible to make a conclusion. But all these people coming out to say he was a belligerent drunk, in contradiction to his testimony, will bring him down.

I think DJT is thinking about dumping him. Trump doesn't like alcoholics. I think DJT is really mad that he was persuaded by whomever to nominate this guy and *now* it's coming out that the guy had or has drinking issues. DJT is unpredictable, he's not a lock-step, dedicated Republican, he'd sandbag this guy in a second if he's angry.

In the end I think Trump will go by the (foxnews) polls and his personal feelings.

It doesn’t matter if Brett stood up on the table at the hearing and dropped his pants. The GOP - and Trump - have already sold their souls to the devil for this SCOTUS seat. They are ALL IN. No backing out now.

I agree.

And the GOP will lay for the sins of these old white men.

They will lay in November and they will lay in the years ahead when they are replaced by young women who won’t put up with their misogyny and their dirty tricks and their candidates and nominees who sexually abuse women.

The GOP should be very afraid. There will be political consequences for supporting a man who abuses women.

If your last sentence is true how do you explain the sitting POTUS?

Do you think the Blue Wave isn't coming?