Kushner, Manafort and Don Jr. met with a Russian lawyer with Kremlin ties during the campaign

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

Excellent, excellent point. Boy, Team Trump needs to have a strategy meeting or something, they are not coming at this defense in a unified way. Their story is changing by the hour-long cable news interview.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

Excellent, excellent point. Boy, Team Trump needs to have a strategy meeting or something, they are not coming at this defense in a unified way. Their story is changing by the hour-long cable news interview.


Sekulow doesn't know what the f*ck he's talking about. And yet that doesn't stop him. Why anyone would listen to anything this lying sack of turds has to say is beyond me.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Keep it up libs - you are WINNING:


According to a recent Harvard-Harris poll, nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that “there exists a campaign to delegitimize” Trump.

The poll also found out that two-thirds believe the Russia investigation, which is being used to try to undermine Trump’s presidency, is “hurting the country” while a majority thought the “Deep State” was using leaks to “unseat” Trump. Other polls have found that the public actually sides with Trump against the “fake news” media that a majority of Americans believe is working with the “Deep State” to undermine Trump.


http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/339146-poll-voters-grow-weary-of-russia-probes


I see your poll and raise it one.

Percentage of Americans who approve of DJT: 38
Percentage of Americans who disapprove of DJT: 57

http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx




38%+57%=105%

This 5% extra represent who? Deceased? Illegals?


Grade-shool dropouts?

38 + 57 = 95

Aha-ha! Definitely!
Or drunk )))


Alternative math.

Statistics
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

Excellent, excellent point. Boy, Team Trump needs to have a strategy meeting or something, they are not coming at this defense in a unified way. Their story is changing by the hour-long cable news interview.


Sekulow doesn't know what the f*ck he's talking about. And yet that doesn't stop him. Why anyone would listen to anything this lying sack of turds has to say is beyond me.


Why *is* Sekulow even still making the rounds, after all of his "Jews for Jesus" scandal and how his family skimmed millions that were supposed to be for charity?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Keep it up libs - you are WINNING:


According to a recent Harvard-Harris poll, nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that “there exists a campaign to delegitimize” Trump.

The poll also found out that two-thirds believe the Russia investigation, which is being used to try to undermine Trump’s presidency, is “hurting the country” while a majority thought the “Deep State” was using leaks to “unseat” Trump. Other polls have found that the public actually sides with Trump against the “fake news” media that a majority of Americans believe is working with the “Deep State” to undermine Trump.


http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/339146-poll-voters-grow-weary-of-russia-probes


I see your poll and raise it one.

Percentage of Americans who approve of DJT: 38
Percentage of Americans who disapprove of DJT: 57

http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx




38%+57%=105%

This 5% extra represent who? Deceased? Illegals?


Grade-shool dropouts?

38 + 57 = 95

Aha-ha! Definitely!
Or drunk )))


Alternative math.

Statistics


Statistics at least has actual numbers, data and math behind it... As opposed to alternative-facts Trumpland where everyone just makes shit up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

Excellent, excellent point. Boy, Team Trump needs to have a strategy meeting or something, they are not coming at this defense in a unified way. Their story is changing by the hour-long cable news interview.


Sekulow doesn't know what the f*ck he's talking about. And yet that doesn't stop him. Why anyone would listen to anything this lying sack of turds has to say is beyond me.


Why *is* Sekulow even still making the rounds, after all of his "Jews for Jesus" scandal and how his family skimmed millions that were supposed to be for charity?


Why is this scam artist on TV? Because Trump views him as being an effective attack dog. He's done with Spicer and Sanders. And Conway is beyond pathetic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

Excellent, excellent point. Boy, Team Trump needs to have a strategy meeting or something, they are not coming at this defense in a unified way. Their story is changing by the hour-long cable news interview.


Sekulow doesn't know what the f*ck he's talking about. And yet that doesn't stop him. Why anyone would listen to anything this lying sack of turds has to say is beyond me.


Why *is* Sekulow even still making the rounds, after all of his "Jews for Jesus" scandal and how his family skimmed millions that were supposed to be for charity?


Trump and Sekulow are Republicans, so it's totally fine for them to run completely bogus self-dealing charities focused only on their own enrichment.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

Excellent, excellent point. Boy, Team Trump needs to have a strategy meeting or something, they are not coming at this defense in a unified way. Their story is changing by the hour-long cable news interview.


Sekulow doesn't know what the f*ck he's talking about. And yet that doesn't stop him. Why anyone would listen to anything this lying sack of turds has to say is beyond me.


Why *is* Sekulow even still making the rounds, after all of his "Jews for Jesus" scandal and how his family skimmed millions that were supposed to be for charity?


Why is this scam artist on TV? Because Trump views him as being an effective attack dog. He's done with Spicer and Sanders. And Conway is beyond pathetic.


Effective attack dog? Hold that thought. Chris Wallace handed Sekulow his ass this morning.

Anonymous
Love that the campaign is using donor money to pay the Trump Corporation for legal consulting. MAGA.
Anonymous

Thanks for posting the Chris Wallace piece. I don't watch Fox, but it appears that Chris Wallace is not a stooge. He seems to think.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Love that the campaign is using donor money to pay the Trump Corporation for legal consulting. MAGA.

Do the chumps for Trump know this?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Love that the campaign is using donor money to pay the Trump Corporation for legal consulting. MAGA.

Do the chumps for Trump know this?



they probably feel like they are fighting the lying media.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This is the first confirmed private meeting between a Russian national - a lawyer with ties to the Kremlin - and Trump’s inner circle during the campaign. Don Jr. specifically denied setting up meetings with Russians during the campaign.
https://apple.news/AjTvqWoUpRQiR7uaV5cfzTQ

Has Uday lawyered up yet?


I saw what you did here, OP. Uday was the son of Saddam Hussain!!!

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is the first confirmed private meeting between a Russian national - a lawyer with ties to the Kremlin - and Trump’s inner circle during the campaign. Don Jr. specifically denied setting up meetings with Russians during the campaign.
https://apple.news/AjTvqWoUpRQiR7uaV5cfzTQ

Has Uday lawyered up yet?


I saw what you did here, OP. Uday was the son of Saddam Hussain!!!



Haven't been online in the past few weeks?
Anonymous
I wonder if any Russian money is finding its way to Kasowitz's firm.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: