Kushner, Manafort and Don Jr. met with a Russian lawyer with Kremlin ties during the campaign

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep it up libs - you are WINNING:


According to a recent Harvard-Harris poll, nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that “there exists a campaign to delegitimize” Trump.

The poll also found out that two-thirds believe the Russia investigation, which is being used to try to undermine Trump’s presidency, is “hurting the country” while a majority thought the “Deep State” was using leaks to “unseat” Trump. Other polls have found that the public actually sides with Trump against the “fake news” media that a majority of Americans believe is working with the “Deep State” to undermine Trump.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/339146-poll-voters-grow-weary-of-russia-probes

I see your poll and raise it one.

Percentage of Americans who approve of DJT: 38
Percentage of Americans who disapprove of DJT: 57

http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx

38%+57%=105%

This 5% extra represent who? Deceased? Illegals?

Grade-shool dropouts?

38 + 57 = 95

Aha-ha! Definitely!
Or drunk )))

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest, for those who still think the meeting was just about adoption:
https://www.rferl.org/a/russian-gave-trump-son-donald-jr-folder-information-damaging-hillary-clinton/28617669.html

So let's believe the Russian government operative? Right libs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep it up libs - you are WINNING:


According to a recent Harvard-Harris poll, nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that “there exists a campaign to delegitimize” Trump.

The poll also found out that two-thirds believe the Russia investigation, which is being used to try to undermine Trump’s presidency, is “hurting the country” while a majority thought the “Deep State” was using leaks to “unseat” Trump. Other polls have found that the public actually sides with Trump against the “fake news” media that a majority of Americans believe is working with the “Deep State” to undermine Trump.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/339146-poll-voters-grow-weary-of-russia-probes

I see your poll and raise it one.

Percentage of Americans who approve of DJT: 38
Percentage of Americans who disapprove of DJT: 57

http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx

38%+57%=105%

This 5% extra represent who? Deceased? Illegals?

Grade-shool dropouts?

38 + 57 = 95

Aha-ha! Definitely!
Or drunk )))

Alternative math.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest, for those who still think the meeting was just about adoption:
https://www.rferl.org/a/russian-gave-trump-son-donald-jr-folder-information-damaging-hillary-clinton/28617669.html

So let's believe the Russian government operative? Right libs?

As opposed to believing the probably dishonest Trumps?

[Anonymous]

^^^probably = provably

[Anonymous]

Believing Trump has never steered anyone wrong before.



Hahahaha.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest, for those who still think the meeting was just about adoption:
https://www.rferl.org/a/russian-gave-trump-son-donald-jr-folder-information-damaging-hillary-clinton/28617669.html

So let's believe the Russian government operative? Right libs?

As opposed to believing the probably dishonest Trumps?

I don't believe Russian lobbyist when he says Russian lawyer left a folder of info on dnc/Clinton.

I do believe Russian lobbyist is throwing Russian lawyer under the bus, which just adds to the likelihood that the meeting was a classic Russian intelligence operation. Creepy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the latest, for those who still think the meeting was just about adoption:
https://www.rferl.org/a/russian-gave-trump-son-donald-jr-folder-information-damaging-hillary-clinton/28617669.html

So let's believe the Russian government operative? Right libs?

It's actually Trump and company who have been believing everything the Russians have been telling them.

[Anonymous]

If Trump jr acted as a 'private citizen' can Trump sr legally pay Jr's legal fees from campaign dollars? or is paying an acknowledgement that Jr was part of the campaign?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Trump jr acted as a 'private citizen' can Trump sr legally pay Jr's legal fees from campaign dollars? or is paying an acknowledgement that Jr was part of the campaign?

No. This pretty much guarantees they acknowledge that he was an official part of the campaign. But it is not surprising since Manafort was there.

[Anonymous]

Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

Good question. Does secret service protect family members of candidates? Or just the candidate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow complained that if the people attending the meeting were so nefarious, then the Secret Service should have vetted them.

First of all, it is not the SS job to vet who the POTUS or PEOTUS meets with in terms of political safety, just physical safety.

Second, at the time of this meeting, Trump had captured enough delegates to win the nomination, but was still a month away from the Cleveland RNC and as such, was not entitled to SS protection (was he?)

Third, if the SS should have been away of this meeting per Trump's attorney, that means Trump himself would have had to be present for it.

Was he?

Good question. Does secret service protect family members of candidates? Or just the candidate?

Only spouses, within 120 days of the election.

https://www.secretservice.gov/about/faqs/

[Anonymous]

Ergo....

[Anonymous]

Manafort and Fredo sat in meeting. Kushner left in order to let Trump not to do a pop-in.