FCPS Boundary Review Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was out in Loudoun earlier today and just traveled from 193/Route 7 (Dranesville) to Cooper and Langley.

Non-rush hour and perfect driving conditions.

To Cooper: 9 miles and 21 minutes

To Langley: 10 miles and 25 minutes

No doubt that trip is considerably longer during rush hour and when driving conditions are poor.

Whatever else happens with the boundary review, if there is a practical way to send those kids to a closer school, that's what FCPS should do. We are paying a lot just to allow one set of wealthy kids to attend school with other wealthy kids and no poor kids.

Just to push back against tour narrative. I live out there, and have taken to checking travel times from Forestville when the buses go by my house. The delta is 3.4 minutes longer to cooper than HMS on average and 9.8 minutes longer to Langley than HHS.

Not sure what you think it costs to employ an extra bus driver for half an hour a day, but I assure you $12 is the lowest hanging fruit that they could go after.

Get yourself a better argument, or at least admit it’s all an equity play for you.

Dude - there is a group on replying with the same argument; their goal is to get the Dems out. This was brought up before on the other forums. Certain Republicans are using the FCPS forum to foment some anger. There was even a debate to show where equity was the primary goal - it's not anywhere. The goal has been dealing with over populated schools.

Geography cannot be defeated by bussing. This is a physical limitation.

If there is a Republican plan to handle the overcrowding then let's hear it. But so far it's get the Dems out and make some deep cuts to FCPS.

Maybe stop wasting millions of dollars on political fads (e.g., million dollar+ name changes from Woodson to ... Woodson) and DEI crap and FCPS would have more money to actually, ya know, carry out their mission of educating kids. Just a thought.

You didn’t really answer PP’s question. How do we get rid of overcrowding if not boundary changes?

DP.

Well, PP said that two of the three overcrowded schools are chantilly and centreville, and the centreville expansion costing hundreds if millions seems to be on track. So not sure why they couldn’t do something similar for McLean. Problem solved.

Otherwise, move the two McLean islands and call it a day. There is no need for further moves than that.

You just don't want the poor kids at McLean. You want to turn it into another Langley. Shame on you.

You do know you’re likely responding to a Langley poster who’s saying whatever they do with McLean needn’t require moving anyone out of Langley (“no need for further moves than that”), right?

That poster doesn’t care one way or the other how many poor kids end up at McLean. They just want to be unaffected by any boundary changes.

DP. Give it a rest. Your constant invoking of Langley as some kind of boogeyman just makes you look idiotic. You have no idea who wrote the post in question. Grow up, for once.

Have you completely lost your marbles or never read the FairFACTS Matters FB page? Great Falls posters there often talk about potential boundary changes that could affect other schools but not require moving anyone out of Langley.

You blaming fairfacts matters for what posters post on their Facebook page is like me blaming dcurbanmoms for the drivel that you write.

FFM is a county wide organization that doesn’t limit its members to GF.

Come up with a better argument, because you’re floundering.

The posters on that FB page generally are identified by name and typically indicate where they live or their pyramids.

It’s neither controversial nor insulting to observe that quite a few Langley posters argue that, whatever happens to boundaries at other schools, they don’t think anyone needs to be moved out of Langley. In some cases, they illustrate that by referring to specific boundary changes that might involve other schools.

And, as I’ve pointed out before, their position is bolstered by the fact that Langley could claw back 100 additional seats just by ceasing to accept pupil placements.

I will say that, since DOGE started cutting federal jobs, some on that page have argued that the entire boundary review process should be halted, but that’s a more recent development.

Ah, but you’re trying to change your argument mid-stream.

Frankly, I’ve heard from people all over the county that they don’t want boundary changes. Go look at the pages posted on the BRAC website from the community meetings- people are overwhelmingly against boundary changes. The fact that there are people from GF on that page defending their pyramid has more to do with the equity warriors trying to drag their kids to a different school pyramid to balance FARMs at the other school. No parents want their kids moved to a different school system to fill a quota.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So when is the next BRAC meeting?

No ones knows except the members. The meetings are supposed to be posted in advance and made public but the SB is keeping them secret. Need to check Reddit for leaks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:3/13/25 is the SB meeting with the presentations of the potential scope for the Coates and Parklawn boundary processes. Total 25% of FCPS elementary schools in these 2 processes running concurrently with the divisionwide process. What's the implementation school year? 1 apart? And to top it off there is the Reid middle school 6-8. Plus AAP movement to/from sites not in the base school including those with AAP proposed scope: Forest Edge, Sunrise Valley, Canterbury Woods.
https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/DEGNCN5F4E0B/$file/Presentation%20-%20Proposed%20Scope%20for%20Coates%20ES%20Boundary%20Study.pdf

Yeah, it's kind of a mess with all this going on simultaneously. Keep in mind some of the earlier ES boundary changes (Glen Forest, Kent Gardens) are still getting phased in as well.

I don't think they have the bandwidth to sort this out at the same time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:3/13/25 is the SB meeting with the presentations of the potential scope for the Coates and Parklawn boundary processes. Total 25% of FCPS elementary schools in these 2 processes running concurrently with the divisionwide process. What's the implementation school year? 1 apart? And to top it off there is the Reid middle school 6-8. Plus AAP movement to/from sites not in the base school including those with AAP proposed scope: Forest Edge, Sunrise Valley, Canterbury Woods.
https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/DEGNCN5F4E0B/$file/Presentation%20-%20Proposed%20Scope%20for%20Coates%20ES%20Boundary%20Study.pdf

You post frequent with lots of valuable information.

But it is so difficult to understand what you are posting because you post everything in random fragments that are completely uncomnected to the previous fragment. It reads like an inner monologue starting midway between several independent conversations.

Would you consider posting either in complete sentences or bullet points?

I think your sharing of valuable insight and history would be so more effective if it was written in a simple, clear and concise way.

Right now the posts read like

"Bacon and eggs. Blew my budget... annoying cashier, (insert link) Kid always complaining; FIVE HOURS! (Insert link) Recipes never work for me??? thanks mother in law.. quit calling. Always start the day with breakfast"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was out in Loudoun earlier today and just traveled from 193/Route 7 (Dranesville) to Cooper and Langley.

Non-rush hour and perfect driving conditions.

To Cooper: 9 miles and 21 minutes

To Langley: 10 miles and 25 minutes

No doubt that trip is considerably longer during rush hour and when driving conditions are poor.

Whatever else happens with the boundary review, if there is a practical way to send those kids to a closer school, that's what FCPS should do. We are paying a lot just to allow one set of wealthy kids to attend school with other wealthy kids and no poor kids.

Just to push back against tour narrative. I live out there, and have taken to checking travel times from Forestville when the buses go by my house. The delta is 3.4 minutes longer to cooper than HMS on average and 9.8 minutes longer to Langley than HHS.

Not sure what you think it costs to employ an extra bus driver for half an hour a day, but I assure you $12 is the lowest hanging fruit that they could go after.

Get yourself a better argument, or at least admit it’s all an equity play for you.

Dude - there is a group on replying with the same argument; their goal is to get the Dems out. This was brought up before on the other forums. Certain Republicans are using the FCPS forum to foment some anger. There was even a debate to show where equity was the primary goal - it's not anywhere. The goal has been dealing with over populated schools.

Geography cannot be defeated by bussing. This is a physical limitation.

If there is a Republican plan to handle the overcrowding then let's hear it. But so far it's get the Dems out and make some deep cuts to FCPS.

Maybe stop wasting millions of dollars on political fads (e.g., million dollar+ name changes from Woodson to ... Woodson) and DEI crap and FCPS would have more money to actually, ya know, carry out their mission of educating kids. Just a thought.

You didn’t really answer PP’s question. How do we get rid of overcrowding if not boundary changes?

DP.

Well, PP said that two of the three overcrowded schools are chantilly and centreville, and the centreville expansion costing hundreds if millions seems to be on track. So not sure why they couldn’t do something similar for McLean. Problem solved.

Otherwise, move the two McLean islands and call it a day. There is no need for further moves than that.

You just don't want the poor kids at McLean. You want to turn it into another Langley. Shame on you.

You do know you’re likely responding to a Langley poster who’s saying whatever they do with McLean needn’t require moving anyone out of Langley (“no need for further moves than that”), right?

That poster doesn’t care one way or the other how many poor kids end up at McLean. They just want to be unaffected by any boundary changes.

DP. Give it a rest. Your constant invoking of Langley as some kind of boogeyman just makes you look idiotic. You have no idea who wrote the post in question. Grow up, for once.

Have you completely lost your marbles or never read the FairFACTS Matters FB page? Great Falls posters there often talk about potential boundary changes that could affect other schools but not require moving anyone out of Langley.

You blaming fairfacts matters for what posters post on their Facebook page is like me blaming dcurbanmoms for the drivel that you write.

FFM is a county wide organization that doesn’t limit its members to GF.

Come up with a better argument, because you’re floundering.

The posters on that FB page generally are identified by name and typically indicate where they live or their pyramids.

It’s neither controversial nor insulting to observe that quite a few Langley posters argue that, whatever happens to boundaries at other schools, they don’t think anyone needs to be moved out of Langley. In some cases, they illustrate that by referring to specific boundary changes that might involve other schools.

And, as I’ve pointed out before, their position is bolstered by the fact that Langley could claw back 100 additional seats just by ceasing to accept pupil placements.

I will say that, since DOGE started cutting federal jobs, some on that page have argued that the entire boundary review process should be halted, but that’s a more recent development.

DP. I have heard NO ONE say they want boundary changes. Well, except for those who would stand to benefit from them, of course. Stop your incessant blathering about Langley. They don’t want their kids moved any more than you want YOUR kids moved.

So NO ONE wants boundary changes except for those who DO want boundary changes?

Can we look forward to more brilliant analysis of this nature?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was out in Loudoun earlier today and just traveled from 193/Route 7 (Dranesville) to Cooper and Langley.

Non-rush hour and perfect driving conditions.

To Cooper: 9 miles and 21 minutes

To Langley: 10 miles and 25 minutes

No doubt that trip is considerably longer during rush hour and when driving conditions are poor.

Whatever else happens with the boundary review, if there is a practical way to send those kids to a closer school, that's what FCPS should do. We are paying a lot just to allow one set of wealthy kids to attend school with other wealthy kids and no poor kids.

Just to push back against tour narrative. I live out there, and have taken to checking travel times from Forestville when the buses go by my house. The delta is 3.4 minutes longer to cooper than HMS on average and 9.8 minutes longer to Langley than HHS.

Not sure what you think it costs to employ an extra bus driver for half an hour a day, but I assure you $12 is the lowest hanging fruit that they could go after.

Get yourself a better argument, or at least admit it’s all an equity play for you.

Dude - there is a group on replying with the same argument; their goal is to get the Dems out. This was brought up before on the other forums. Certain Republicans are using the FCPS forum to foment some anger. There was even a debate to show where equity was the primary goal - it's not anywhere. The goal has been dealing with over populated schools.

Geography cannot be defeated by bussing. This is a physical limitation.

If there is a Republican plan to handle the overcrowding then let's hear it. But so far it's get the Dems out and make some deep cuts to FCPS.

Maybe stop wasting millions of dollars on political fads (e.g., million dollar+ name changes from Woodson to ... Woodson) and DEI crap and FCPS would have more money to actually, ya know, carry out their mission of educating kids. Just a thought.

You didn’t really answer PP’s question. How do we get rid of overcrowding if not boundary changes?

DP.

Well, PP said that two of the three overcrowded schools are chantilly and centreville, and the centreville expansion costing hundreds if millions seems to be on track. So not sure why they couldn’t do something similar for McLean. Problem solved.

Otherwise, move the two McLean islands and call it a day. There is no need for further moves than that.

You just don't want the poor kids at McLean. You want to turn it into another Langley. Shame on you.

You do know you’re likely responding to a Langley poster who’s saying whatever they do with McLean needn’t require moving anyone out of Langley (“no need for further moves than that”), right?

That poster doesn’t care one way or the other how many poor kids end up at McLean. They just want to be unaffected by any boundary changes.

DP. Give it a rest. Your constant invoking of Langley as some kind of boogeyman just makes you look idiotic. You have no idea who wrote the post in question. Grow up, for once.

Have you completely lost your marbles or never read the FairFACTS Matters FB page? Great Falls posters there often talk about potential boundary changes that could affect other schools but not require moving anyone out of Langley.

You blaming fairfacts matters for what posters post on their Facebook page is like me blaming dcurbanmoms for the drivel that you write.

FFM is a county wide organization that doesn’t limit its members to GF.

Come up with a better argument, because you’re floundering.

The posters on that FB page generally are identified by name and typically indicate where they live or their pyramids.

It’s neither controversial nor insulting to observe that quite a few Langley posters argue that, whatever happens to boundaries at other schools, they don’t think anyone needs to be moved out of Langley. In some cases, they illustrate that by referring to specific boundary changes that might involve other schools.

And, as I’ve pointed out before, their position is bolstered by the fact that Langley could claw back 100 additional seats just by ceasing to accept pupil placements.

I will say that, since DOGE started cutting federal jobs, some on that page have argued that the entire boundary review process should be halted, but that’s a more recent development.

DP. I have heard NO ONE say they want boundary changes. Well, except for those who would stand to benefit from them, of course. Stop your incessant blathering about Langley. They don’t want their kids moved any more than you want YOUR kids moved.

So NO ONE wants boundary changes except for those who DO want boundary changes?

Can we look forward to more brilliant analysis of this nature?

+1. Yes more of that will come with “School Board shills,” “equity warriors” and “boundary changes for ther but not for me” peppered in. This topic has made me wish DCUM required registration. I suspect that a few people have made hundreds of posts about boundaries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was out in Loudoun earlier today and just traveled from 193/Route 7 (Dranesville) to Cooper and Langley.

Non-rush hour and perfect driving conditions.

To Cooper: 9 miles and 21 minutes

To Langley: 10 miles and 25 minutes

No doubt that trip is considerably longer during rush hour and when driving conditions are poor.

Whatever else happens with the boundary review, if there is a practical way to send those kids to a closer school, that's what FCPS should do. We are paying a lot just to allow one set of wealthy kids to attend school with other wealthy kids and no poor kids.

Just to push back against tour narrative. I live out there, and have taken to checking travel times from Forestville when the buses go by my house. The delta is 3.4 minutes longer to cooper than HMS on average and 9.8 minutes longer to Langley than HHS.

Not sure what you think it costs to employ an extra bus driver for half an hour a day, but I assure you $12 is the lowest hanging fruit that they could go after.

Get yourself a better argument, or at least admit it’s all an equity play for you.

Dude - there is a group on replying with the same argument; their goal is to get the Dems out. This was brought up before on the other forums. Certain Republicans are using the FCPS forum to foment some anger. There was even a debate to show where equity was the primary goal - it's not anywhere. The goal has been dealing with over populated schools.

Geography cannot be defeated by bussing. This is a physical limitation.

If there is a Republican plan to handle the overcrowding then let's hear it. But so far it's get the Dems out and make some deep cuts to FCPS.

Maybe stop wasting millions of dollars on political fads (e.g., million dollar+ name changes from Woodson to ... Woodson) and DEI crap and FCPS would have more money to actually, ya know, carry out their mission of educating kids. Just a thought.

You didn’t really answer PP’s question. How do we get rid of overcrowding if not boundary changes?

DP.

Well, PP said that two of the three overcrowded schools are chantilly and centreville, and the centreville expansion costing hundreds if millions seems to be on track. So not sure why they couldn’t do something similar for McLean. Problem solved.

Otherwise, move the two McLean islands and call it a day. There is no need for further moves than that.

You just don't want the poor kids at McLean. You want to turn it into another Langley. Shame on you.

You do know you’re likely responding to a Langley poster who’s saying whatever they do with McLean needn’t require moving anyone out of Langley (“no need for further moves than that”), right?

That poster doesn’t care one way or the other how many poor kids end up at McLean. They just want to be unaffected by any boundary changes.

DP. Give it a rest. Your constant invoking of Langley as some kind of boogeyman just makes you look idiotic. You have no idea who wrote the post in question. Grow up, for once.

Have you completely lost your marbles or never read the FairFACTS Matters FB page? Great Falls posters there often talk about potential boundary changes that could affect other schools but not require moving anyone out of Langley.

You blaming fairfacts matters for what posters post on their Facebook page is like me blaming dcurbanmoms for the drivel that you write.

FFM is a county wide organization that doesn’t limit its members to GF.

Come up with a better argument, because you’re floundering.

The posters on that FB page generally are identified by name and typically indicate where they live or their pyramids.

It’s neither controversial nor insulting to observe that quite a few Langley posters argue that, whatever happens to boundaries at other schools, they don’t think anyone needs to be moved out of Langley. In some cases, they illustrate that by referring to specific boundary changes that might involve other schools.

And, as I’ve pointed out before, their position is bolstered by the fact that Langley could claw back 100 additional seats just by ceasing to accept pupil placements.

I will say that, since DOGE started cutting federal jobs, some on that page have argued that the entire boundary review process should be halted, but that’s a more recent development.

DP. I have heard NO ONE say they want boundary changes. Well, except for those who would stand to benefit from them, of course. Stop your incessant blathering about Langley. They don’t want their kids moved any more than you want YOUR kids moved.

So NO ONE wants boundary changes except for those who DO want boundary changes?

Can we look forward to more brilliant analysis of this nature?

+1. Yes more of that will come with “School Board shills,” “equity warriors” and “boundary changes for ther but not for me” peppered in. This topic has made me wish DCUM required registration. I suspect that a few people have made hundreds of posts about boundaries.

That’s a different poster, not me. But her point is a valid one, namely that peoples who want boundary changes are primarily looking to mooch off of other Fairfax families. It’s pretty gross if you think about it.

You two love to attack the messengers, but it’s because you are devoid of any actual compelling reasons for boundary changes that would significantly negatively affect the impacted students and also drive the country further along its death spiral.

[Anonymous]

There are plenty of reasons for boundary changes. They have been stated repeatedly. You don’t agree with them but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist. The bullying from anti change people who immediately insult people to shut down discussion is aggressive and ugly.

And fair facts matter sent its members to community meetings throughout county (and spread them at different tables) even though they lived in great falls to make it seem there was opposition everywhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:3/13/25 is the SB meeting with the presentations of the potential scope for the Coates and Parklawn boundary processes. Total 25% of FCPS elementary schools in these 2 processes running concurrently with the divisionwide process. What's the implementation school year? 1 apart? And to top it off there is the Reid middle school 6-8. Plus AAP movement to/from sites not in the base school including those with AAP proposed scope: Forest Edge, Sunrise Valley, Canterbury Woods.
https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/DEGNCN5F4E0B/$file/Presentation%20-%20Proposed%20Scope%20for%20Coates%20ES%20Boundary%20Study.pdf

You post frequent with lots of valuable information.

But it is so difficult to understand what you are posting because you post everything in random fragments that are completely uncomnected to the previous fragment. It reads like an inner monologue starting midway between several independent conversations.

Would you consider posting either in complete sentences or bullet points?

I think your sharing of valuable insight and history would be so more effective if it was written in a simple, clear and concise way.

Right now the posts read like

"Bacon and eggs. Blew my budget... annoying cashier, (insert link) Kid always complaining; FIVE HOURS! (Insert link) Recipes never work for me??? thanks mother in law.. quit calling. Always start the day with breakfast"

OMG, I’m dying. Spot on.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are plenty of reasons for boundary changes. They have been stated repeatedly. You don’t agree with them but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist. The bullying from anti change people who immediately insult people to shut down discussion is aggressive and ugly.

And fair facts matter sent its members to community meetings throughout county (and spread them at different tables) even though they lived in great falls to make it seem there was opposition everywhere.

Where do your kids attend school? I think it should be required to state what schools your children attend if you want anyone to take you seriously in your quest for boundary changes. Mine attend Langley and I’ve been very open about that. So where do yours go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are plenty of reasons for boundary changes. They have been stated repeatedly. You don’t agree with them but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist. The bullying from anti change people who immediately insult people to shut down discussion is aggressive and ugly.

And fair facts matter sent its members to community meetings throughout county (and spread them at different tables) even though they lived in great falls to make it seem there was opposition everywhere.

Citation for this claim ^^? And fyi - opposition IS everywhere. WSHS does NOT want to move to Lewis. NO ONE WANTS TO MOVE. Not sure why you can’t grasp this.

[Anonymous]

Speaking of FairFACTS Matters, what happened over at the Great Falls Citizens Association? The Executive Board supposedly terminated the President and the Secretary this week over a $5000 contribution made to FairFACTS Matters to help fight any boundary changes that would move Great Falls families out of Langley.

The possibility of boundary changes really does end up pitting people against each other, even within the Great Falls community.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:3/13/25 is the SB meeting with the presentations of the potential scope for the Coates and Parklawn boundary processes. Total 25% of FCPS elementary schools in these 2 processes running concurrently with the divisionwide process. What's the implementation school year? 1 apart? And to top it off there is the Reid middle school 6-8. Plus AAP movement to/from sites not in the base school including those with AAP proposed scope: Forest Edge, Sunrise Valley, Canterbury Woods.
https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/DEGNCN5F4E0B/$file/Presentation%20-%20Proposed%20Scope%20for%20Coates%20ES%20Boundary%20Study.pdf

You post frequent with lots of valuable information.

But it is so difficult to understand what you are posting because you post everything in random fragments that are completely uncomnected to the previous fragment. It reads like an inner monologue starting midway between several independent conversations.

Would you consider posting either in complete sentences or bullet points?

I think your sharing of valuable insight and history would be so more effective if it was written in a simple, clear and concise way.

Right now the posts read like

"Bacon and eggs. Blew my budget... annoying cashier, (insert link) Kid always complaining; FIVE HOURS! (Insert link) Recipes never work for me??? thanks mother in law.. quit calling. Always start the day with breakfast"

OMG, I’m dying. Spot on.
DP

That’s just cruel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are plenty of reasons for boundary changes. They have been stated repeatedly. You don’t agree with them but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist. The bullying from anti change people who immediately insult people to shut down discussion is aggressive and ugly.

And fair facts matter sent its members to community meetings throughout county (and spread them at different tables) even though they lived in great falls to make it seem there was opposition everywhere.

Where do your kids attend school? I think it should be required to state what schools your children attend if you want anyone to take you seriously in your quest for boundary changes. Mine attend Langley and I’ve been very open about that. So where do yours go?

McLean HS but that’s not the point. Some of us can see that capacity usage and transportation should be made more efficient for the system as a whole. It’s not just about our own kids (I also think all kids will be fine after a brief adjustment- boundary changes happen regularly elsewhere; kids aren’t moved all by themselves, they will be moved with their neighborhoods;
Fcps has the same curriculum and staff quality throughout…).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are plenty of reasons for boundary changes. They have been stated repeatedly. You don’t agree with them but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist. The bullying from anti change people who immediately insult people to shut down discussion is aggressive and ugly.

And fair facts matter sent its members to community meetings throughout county (and spread them at different tables) even though they lived in great falls to make it seem there was opposition everywhere.

Ummm, the second part is just a straight up lie. Fairfacts matters told the group about the meetings in all of the regions because there are group members in each region. There was no coordinated effort to “spread them at different tables”.

Now, if you want to talk about putting your thumb on the scale, you could ask why FPAC members sat themselves at the different tables at various meetings. That is actually nefarious as they are a school board-group masquerading as community members.

You lose credibility when you lie.

And people across the entire county don’t want these changes, despite what you two SB shills think.