New Mexico Governor's unConstitutional power grab

Anonymous
The governor of NM, Michelle Lujan Grisham, issued an emergency order on Friday suspending the right to carry guns in public across Albuquerque and the surrounding Bernalillo County for at least 30 days following recent instances of gun violence.

Although the right to carry is codified in the NM Constitution, she claims that in the event of emergencies, the rights as outlined in the constitution can be temporarily abolished.

Even some of the most ardent gun control activists don't agree with her.



If you agree with her EO, what other rights can be abolished "in the event of an emergency?"
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
The US Constitution does not provide a right to open carry weapons. So, I have no idea what Hogg and Lieu think they are talking about. It will be up to New Mexico's Supreme Court to determine whether this move is allowed under the state's constitution or not.
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:The US Constitution does not provide a right to open carry weapons. So, I have no idea what Hogg and Lieu think they are talking about. It will be up to New Mexico's Supreme Court to determine whether this move is allowed under the state's constitution or not.


The U.S. Constitution doesn't provide any rights. Rights are granted by God (or by nature if that makes you nervous). The point is, the U.S. Constitution is a negative check on government power. Furthermore, since rights are NOT granted by man, they cannot be taken away by man.

Carry on... literally.

Anonymous
jsteele wrote:The US Constitution does not provide a right to open carry weapons. So, I have no idea what Hogg and Lieu think they are talking about. It will be up to New Mexico's Supreme Court to determine whether this move is allowed under the state's constitution or not.


+1. This is insane. There has never been a constitutional right to concealed or open carry. Concealed carry laws to ALLOW the practice were enacted starting in the '80's. Not a great sign when gun control proponents don't even know the history of gun control.
Anonymous
Bernalillo County Sheriff will not enforce the Governor's illicit mandate. Good. GOOD.

https://twitter.com/BCSONM/status/1700630632408478043?t=WLFqjTqcBANDu8kgn51EvA&s=19
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:The US Constitution does not provide a right to open carry weapons. So, I have no idea what Hogg and Lieu think they are talking about. It will be up to New Mexico's Supreme Court to determine whether this move is allowed under the state's constitution or not.


The U.S. Constitution doesn't provide any rights. Rights are granted by God (or by nature if that makes you nervous). The point is, the U.S. Constitution is a negative check on government power. Furthermore, since rights are NOT granted by man, they cannot be taken away by man.

Carry on... literally.



There is no God. That's just a fairy tale in an old book.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:The US Constitution does not provide a right to open carry weapons. So, I have no idea what Hogg and Lieu think they are talking about. It will be up to New Mexico's Supreme Court to determine whether this move is allowed under the state's constitution or not.


+1. This is insane. There has never been a constitutional right to concealed or open carry. Concealed carry laws to ALLOW the practice were enacted starting in the '80's. Not a great sign when gun control proponents don't even know the history of gun control.


If you know the history of gun control then you know that in Heller, SCOTUS affirmed that 2a is NOT an absolute right.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Bernalillo County Sheriff will not enforce the Governor's illicit mandate. Good. GOOD.

https://twitter.com/BCSONM/status/1700630632408478043?t=WLFqjTqcBANDu8kgn51EvA&s=19


Then the next person to get shot in Bernalillo County will be the direct fault of the Sheriff.
Anonymous
She really just F'd herself. So many campaign video cuts in this exchange.

https://rumble.com/v3g8c86-new-mexicos-governor-issued-an-emergency-public-health-order-that.html
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Bernalillo County Sheriff will not enforce the Governor's illicit mandate. Good. GOOD.

https://twitter.com/BCSONM/status/1700630632408478043?t=WLFqjTqcBANDu8kgn51EvA&s=19


Then the next person to get shot in Bernalillo County will be the direct fault of the Sheriff.


No. It will be the fault of the shooter or the recipient. But not the Sheriff.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Bernalillo County Sheriff will not enforce the Governor's illicit mandate. Good. GOOD.

https://twitter.com/BCSONM/status/1700630632408478043?t=WLFqjTqcBANDu8kgn51EvA&s=19


Then the next person to get shot in Bernalillo County will be the direct fault of the Sheriff.


No. It will be the fault of the shooter or the recipient. But not the Sheriff.


The shooting wouldn't have happened if the gun curfew were enforced, so YES the Sherriff is responsible.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:The US Constitution does not provide a right to open carry weapons. So, I have no idea what Hogg and Lieu think they are talking about. It will be up to New Mexico's Supreme Court to determine whether this move is allowed under the state's constitution or not.


The U.S. Constitution doesn't provide any rights. Rights are granted by God (or by nature if that makes you nervous). The point is, the U.S. Constitution is a negative check on government power. Furthermore, since rights are NOT granted by man, they cannot be taken away by man.

Carry on... literally.



God didn't create guns, man did. Thus man can also decide whether or not you have the right to carry them.

The Constitution only affords you the right to keep and bear arms if you are part of a well regulated militia - those three words that you people keep conveniently and unconstitutionally ignoring.
Anonymous
"Gun curfew"?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: