| Can I as a 36 year old childless woman ever be considered a catch? What would my attributes have to be? |
| An attraction to older men. |
| Of course. As at any age certain characteristics are attractive: intelligence, good interpersonal skills, being organized, being reliable, sensitivity, a degree of adventurousness, reasonably open-minded, a good education, sound judgment as shown by good life choices and financial security, at least a little stylish, good physical fitness, not overweight, varied interests/hobbies, some professional accomplishments and ambition. |
| You’d be a catch to a man who is either divorced and done with having children or doesn’t want kids. It takes the kid conversations off the table which would be a relief to some men. |
| Ask Don Lemon. |
This. My mom is 70 and considered a catch by her peer group. |
No. Not really how it works. Slender, sexy, and kind. |
| Financially secure, good adoptive mother, nice looking. |
I think men who want kids may still be in the game for a few years. Several of my friends had kids around 40 with men being significantly older. |
| Yes to a man over 40. |
OR, a catch to a man that wants kids but doesn’t want to wait forever. |
Or younger ones who are divorced. |
Clown question, bro |
Anyone can be a catch for their person at any age. That being said, according to common standards for a man you yourself would see as a catch, probably a 36 year old woman has to have good health, good temper, good social skills, good looks, good education, well paying job, good credit, good savings, no debt, no criminal record, no addiction, no dependents, compatible family, no kids or crazy ex. |
|
My friend - very good looking, good career, good income, condo, family of origin is functional/intact/rich/connected and has siblings who are rich/connected/helpful/generous.
Her DH is ok looking, has a mediocre career, makes less money than my friend, comes from a broken family, no siblings, does not have property, family is MC. |