|
She gets no damages but judge bans neighbor from smoking pot in his own home
Hahahahahahaha See you in court potheads |
| Now can we do this on certain streets? |
| Story is in Washington post |
| This is fantastic |
| That's awesome!!! |
|
Interesting that smell is now taken into account regarding what you are free to do or not do in your own home.
It must have been a strong and persistent smell for the judge to react this way. |
All streets |
| Why don't people just use edibles? I just do not understand. |
|
Hmm. The article states in the first sentence that the marijuana was for medical purposes, but does not explain whether there was a doctor's letter. This could get fraught, if someone with a serious or terminal illness gets sued for managing pain or other symptoms with marijuana. |
Maybe it doesn't have quite the same effect? |
There is no such thing as “medical marijuana.” It’s all bull. If a pharmaceutical company made such flimsy claims about their drugs, they’d be sued out of existence. |
No such thing as medical oxytocin or medical acetaminophen either. |
Smoking takes effect faster and lets you control duration and intensity. A puff is much smaller than an edible. Better question is why nto vape. |
| Wouldn’t this mean that I can sue my neighbor for their leaf blower too? |