Theoretically, if you could have three kids each 10 years apart (so, for example, having the, at 24, 34 & 44) would you?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| I always think that would’ve been interesting. At least two of them would be in separate generations from one another. I also think I would’ve developed a lot of parenting wisdom. |
Anonymous
| Nope. |
Anonymous
| No. That's like having 3 only children. |
Anonymous
| Absolutely not, nothing about that appeals to me |
Anonymous
|
Donald Trump, Clint Eastwood, Eddie Murphy.
|
Anonymous
| No! Why on earth would anyone do this theoretically or in real like? Torture! |
Anonymous
| No way. Condensed parenting is long enough. |
Anonymous
All with same mom? Women do most of the heavy lifting. Terrible examples! |
Anonymous
You would also never sleep, and probably die early. |
Anonymous
Kate Winslet & Reese Witherspoon both had kids 12-13 years apart |
Anonymous
| No! |
Anonymous
| My friend was close to that due to secondary infertility. Her kids are 23, 13, and 6. Works for them. |
Anonymous
| If any of you watched the later seasons of Dance Moms, Kalani’s mom now has kids ranging in age from 0-22. |
Anonymous
My great grandparents did, and it was 6 or 7 kids and I think they had their first at 20 and last at 40 or about those ages. I don't know if the oldest and youngest ever spent much time together. The oldest (my grandparent) got married around 18 or so and moved out of state. |
Anonymous
This. |