Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

Who cares, she was a consenting adult. White women are perfect angels and have no agency in your worldview, we get it. Doesn't change the reality that she's a #metoo grifter.

Just found out she was married too, wow. So she's not just a grifter, but she's a cheater herself. Or are cheaters exempt from being morally bankrupt because they're students?

Will the poster who wrote this comment please explain what you mean more and talk about some of the other comments you have written in this thread?

Pro-Lively supporters say Elyse was taken advantage of because of the student-teacher dynamic. But Elyse was married. So it's okay that she cheated on her husband because she was a student who was allegedly taken advantage of? I don't even know when she was married, so she might have already graduated when she had the affair, in which case that makes here even more pathetic.

I don't think she was taken advantage of and I don't agree with calling her a victim or survivor. But she definitely experienced sexual harassment. I also don't agree with the people calling her a grifter because Wright was the one grifting off these companies and using them to get opportunities for his lovers. He came up with the scheme. The question here was should be able to sue her for defamation for telling this story. It's good that it came out, isn't it? Even though she's also an adulterer? Anyway, she has a lot more evidence of SH than Blake so it really isn't even analogous.

They are both grifters. Maybe that was part of the attraction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I got a notification several hours ago for an "Intervene" filing on the main docket (1:24-cv-10049) as entry 252, but nothing ever appeared there. Anyone know what is up with that?

Ah, it's a Motion to Intervene but what I think is that Dogpool guy who is accusing Reynolds of something ... stealing his ideas or attacking him on the street or something? It's weird because it's not appearing in the right order for me on Court Listener, it's buried in the middle of everything.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.252.0.pdf

I just tried to read that and all I can say is: wut.

Who is that guy, what does he have to do with Dogpool/Nicepool, why does he keep referencing the Taylor Swift stuff in DC (what does that have to do with Dogpool/Nicepool), why is his wife involved, etc. He filed this pro se but appears to have written this motion using AI which, omg as someone who used to work at a legal clinic providing legal assistance to people who couldn't afford lawyers for civil court, please do not do this. You'd be better off just explaining your situation in plain English without legal formatting or citation and then having a free legal clinic kind of tighten it up for you (laypeople tend not to understand which facts are relevant and which will just annoy the judge having to wade through them).

Anyway, interesting this case is so high profile it is apparently attracting the interest of whackadoodles wanting to someone how be involved directly. Wild times.

That motion was very hard to get through. I'm only halfway through and I'm still not really sure what's going on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

If we’re being honest, they should’ve reported him when he propositioned them instead of taking him up on the offer. These sorts of cases are murky, but I agree with Candace Owens when she asks where do you draw the line between sugar baby and victim?

Who is actually quoting Candace Owens in this thread anymore? Are you for real?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

If we’re being honest, they should’ve reported him when he propositioned them instead of taking him up on the offer. These sorts of cases are murky, but I agree with Candace Owens when she asks where do you draw the line between sugar baby and victim?

Who is actually quoting Candace Owens in this thread anymore? Are you for real?

And we will continue quoting her. Owens is intimately involved as several witnesses and parties have directly and indirectly contacted her and leaked information pivotal to the case while having their identities and careers protected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

If we’re being honest, they should’ve reported him when he propositioned them instead of taking him up on the offer. These sorts of cases are murky, but I agree with Candace Owens when she asks where do you draw the line between sugar baby and victim?

Who is actually quoting Candace Owens in this thread anymore? Are you for real?

And who the hell are you, the queen of Sheba? We don't need your permission for who or what to quote.

[Anonymous]

I mean, that person seems like an actual Baldoni supporter to me, and not like a troll or a Lively supporter playacting. It's not me, anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

If we’re being honest, they should’ve reported him when he propositioned them instead of taking him up on the offer. These sorts of cases are murky, but I agree with Candace Owens when she asks where do you draw the line between sugar baby and victim?

Who is actually quoting Candace Owens in this thread anymore? Are you for real?

And we will continue quoting her. Owens is intimately involved as several witnesses and parties have directly and indirectly contacted her and leaked information pivotal to the case while having their identities and careers protected.

That's not true -- she trolls reddit for theories and info and then "reports" it on her channel and claims people leaked it to her directly. She's done this several times. She knows nothing about this case and is just using your interest in the case to get you to view her channel and make money.

Also: she is a Holocaust denier, has theorized that Jews control the weather, accused school shooting survivors of being actors, supports Trump, etc. She's terrible and you should not give her views and likes because it just encourages her terribleness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

If we’re being honest, they should’ve reported him when he propositioned them instead of taking him up on the offer. These sorts of cases are murky, but I agree with Candace Owens when she asks where do you draw the line between sugar baby and victim?

Who is actually quoting Candace Owens in this thread anymore? Are you for real?

And who the hell are you, the queen of Sheba? We don't need your permission for who or what to quote.

See? It's an ideology thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

If we’re being honest, they should’ve reported him when he propositioned them instead of taking him up on the offer. These sorts of cases are murky, but I agree with Candace Owens when she asks where do you draw the line between sugar baby and victim?

Who is actually quoting Candace Owens in this thread anymore? Are you for real?

And we will continue quoting her. Owens is intimately involved as several witnesses and parties have directly and indirectly contacted her and leaked information pivotal to the case while having their identities and careers protected.

That's not true -- she trolls reddit for theories and info and then "reports" it on her channel and claims people leaked it to her directly. She's done this several times. She knows nothing about this case and is just using your interest in the case to get you to view her channel and make money.

Also: she is a Holocaust denier, has theorized that Jews control the weather, accused school shooting survivors of being actors, supports Trump, etc. She's terrible and you should not give her views and likes because it just encourages her terribleness.

I'm low key curious about the weather thing.

[Anonymous]

Still not a peep from Blake on Kevin Costner. I thought she wanted to be the voice for women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Still not a peep from Blake on Kevin Costner. I thought she wanted to be the voice for women?

Uh, the news came out today. Where's Baldoni? I thought his whole thing was holding me accountable for their treatment if women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still not a peep from Blake on Kevin Costner. I thought she wanted to be the voice for women?

Uh, the news came out today. Where's Baldoni? I thought his whole thing was holding me accountable for their treatment if women?

He’s a little busy getting statutes that were written to protect victims of sexual assault and harassment struck down as unconstitutional because he needs his 400 million dollars, sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

If we’re being honest, they should’ve reported him when he propositioned them instead of taking him up on the offer. These sorts of cases are murky, but I agree with Candace Owens when she asks where do you draw the line between sugar baby and victim?

Who is actually quoting Candace Owens in this thread anymore? Are you for real?

And we will continue quoting her. Owens is intimately involved as several witnesses and parties have directly and indirectly contacted her and leaked information pivotal to the case while having their identities and careers protected.

That's not true -- she trolls reddit for theories and info and then "reports" it on her channel and claims people leaked it to her directly. She's done this several times. She knows nothing about this case and is just using your interest in the case to get you to view her channel and make money.

Also: she is a Holocaust denier, has theorized that Jews control the weather, accused school shooting survivors of being actors, supports Trump, etc. She's terrible and you should not give her views and likes because it just encourages her terribleness.

No, she doesn't. She's directly in contact with multiple members of production and has first hand accounts. Your accusations are baseless and conjecture. We'll continue quoting Owens along with the other parties such as Flaa and Hilton who witnesses have also provided information privately and publicly.

[Anonymous]

See? This person is serious. It’s not a troll or someone posing etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

If we’re being honest, they should’ve reported him when he propositioned them instead of taking him up on the offer. These sorts of cases are murky, but I agree with Candace Owens when she asks where do you draw the line between sugar baby and victim?

Who is actually quoting Candace Owens in this thread anymore? Are you for real?

And we will continue quoting her. Owens is intimately involved as several witnesses and parties have directly and indirectly contacted her and leaked information pivotal to the case while having their identities and careers protected.

That's not true -- she trolls reddit for theories and info and then "reports" it on her channel and claims people leaked it to her directly. She's done this several times. She knows nothing about this case and is just using your interest in the case to get you to view her channel and make money.

Also: she is a Holocaust denier, has theorized that Jews control the weather, accused school shooting survivors of being actors, supports Trump, etc. She's terrible and you should not give her views and likes because it just encourages her terribleness.

No, she doesn't. She's directly in contact with multiple members of production and has first hand accounts. Your accusations are baseless and conjecture. We'll continue quoting Owens along with the other parties such as Flaa and Hilton who witnesses have also provided information privately and publicly.

And your just going to ignore her history of antisemitism and conspiracy mongering?

I'm guessing you are someone who thinks Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds are evil, and who points to past examples of them being controlling, lying, or otherwise behaving badly as proof the are in the wrong here, yes?

But you are getting info on this conflict by someone who is known to spread lies and misinformation, and is known to engage in hateful stereotypes. Why aren't Candace Owens' past actions enough to make you distrust her here?