Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

I mean, that person seems like an actual Baldoni supporter to me, and not like a troll or a Lively supporter playacting. It's not me, anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

If we’re being honest, they should’ve reported him when he propositioned them instead of taking him up on the offer. These sorts of cases are murky, but I agree with Candace Owens when she asks where do you draw the line between sugar baby and victim?

Who is actually quoting Candace Owens in this thread anymore? Are you for real?

And we will continue quoting her. Owens is intimately involved as several witnesses and parties have directly and indirectly contacted her and leaked information pivotal to the case while having their identities and careers protected.

That's not true -- she trolls reddit for theories and info and then "reports" it on her channel and claims people leaked it to her directly. She's done this several times. She knows nothing about this case and is just using your interest in the case to get you to view her channel and make money.

Also: she is a Holocaust denier, has theorized that Jews control the weather, accused school shooting survivors of being actors, supports Trump, etc. She's terrible and you should not give her views and likes because it just encourages her terribleness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

If we’re being honest, they should’ve reported him when he propositioned them instead of taking him up on the offer. These sorts of cases are murky, but I agree with Candace Owens when she asks where do you draw the line between sugar baby and victim?

Who is actually quoting Candace Owens in this thread anymore? Are you for real?

And who the hell are you, the queen of Sheba? We don't need your permission for who or what to quote.

See? It's an ideology thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

If we’re being honest, they should’ve reported him when he propositioned them instead of taking him up on the offer. These sorts of cases are murky, but I agree with Candace Owens when she asks where do you draw the line between sugar baby and victim?

Who is actually quoting Candace Owens in this thread anymore? Are you for real?

And we will continue quoting her. Owens is intimately involved as several witnesses and parties have directly and indirectly contacted her and leaked information pivotal to the case while having their identities and careers protected.

That's not true -- she trolls reddit for theories and info and then "reports" it on her channel and claims people leaked it to her directly. She's done this several times. She knows nothing about this case and is just using your interest in the case to get you to view her channel and make money.

Also: she is a Holocaust denier, has theorized that Jews control the weather, accused school shooting survivors of being actors, supports Trump, etc. She's terrible and you should not give her views and likes because it just encourages her terribleness.

I'm low key curious about the weather thing.

[Anonymous]

Still not a peep from Blake on Kevin Costner. I thought she wanted to be the voice for women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Still not a peep from Blake on Kevin Costner. I thought she wanted to be the voice for women?

Uh, the news came out today. Where's Baldoni? I thought his whole thing was holding me accountable for their treatment if women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still not a peep from Blake on Kevin Costner. I thought she wanted to be the voice for women?

Uh, the news came out today. Where's Baldoni? I thought his whole thing was holding me accountable for their treatment if women?

He’s a little busy getting statutes that were written to protect victims of sexual assault and harassment struck down as unconstitutional because he needs his 400 million dollars, sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

If we’re being honest, they should’ve reported him when he propositioned them instead of taking him up on the offer. These sorts of cases are murky, but I agree with Candace Owens when she asks where do you draw the line between sugar baby and victim?

Who is actually quoting Candace Owens in this thread anymore? Are you for real?

And we will continue quoting her. Owens is intimately involved as several witnesses and parties have directly and indirectly contacted her and leaked information pivotal to the case while having their identities and careers protected.

That's not true -- she trolls reddit for theories and info and then "reports" it on her channel and claims people leaked it to her directly. She's done this several times. She knows nothing about this case and is just using your interest in the case to get you to view her channel and make money.

Also: she is a Holocaust denier, has theorized that Jews control the weather, accused school shooting survivors of being actors, supports Trump, etc. She's terrible and you should not give her views and likes because it just encourages her terribleness.

No, she doesn't. She's directly in contact with multiple members of production and has first hand accounts. Your accusations are baseless and conjecture. We'll continue quoting Owens along with the other parties such as Flaa and Hilton who witnesses have also provided information privately and publicly.

[Anonymous]

See? This person is serious. It’s not a troll or someone posing etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elyse Dorsey isn't an "imperfect victim." She's not a victim at all. That relationship was consensual.

Especially when she was a student and Wright was her professor — that was totally great. And the subsequent 6 students he tried it on with.

Honestly, it’s depressing to hear you guys do this and make these arguments. Do you know you’re just proving my point? Maybe you should add some negative comments about her appearance, too, just to get it out of your system?

No question he was a predator who should have been fired. But fully three of the students, including Dorsey, had consensual relationships with him after they graduated that lasted 5 to 10 years each. He got two jobs at Wilson Sonsini and I believe two followed him to the FTC. Wright is a total scum bag, who did all kinds of inappropriate things as a FTC commissioner (basically influence peddling) and he was married throughout. And yet these former students actively competed among themselves for his attention. It would make one hell of a movie, but it certainly isn’t a textbook case of harassment.

Yeah, that was exactly his defense. "I slept with all of these students but I rewarded them all with jobz! So I did nothing wrong, and look at how they're defaming me now!"

I mean, I don't want my law school to work that way, and I am glad that the women reported this man and got him to resign, and that he lost most of the positions of power he had been privileged to hold. Am I going to blame the women because they got involved in relationships with him when they were his students and those relationships went on to last a while? Again, I don't need women who report SH to be perfect victims because I recognize that most perfect victims don't report at all. Why would they, when they could just move on? But feel free to attack these women since that seems to be where you are headed.

If we’re being honest, they should’ve reported him when he propositioned them instead of taking him up on the offer. These sorts of cases are murky, but I agree with Candace Owens when she asks where do you draw the line between sugar baby and victim?

Who is actually quoting Candace Owens in this thread anymore? Are you for real?

And we will continue quoting her. Owens is intimately involved as several witnesses and parties have directly and indirectly contacted her and leaked information pivotal to the case while having their identities and careers protected.

That's not true -- she trolls reddit for theories and info and then "reports" it on her channel and claims people leaked it to her directly. She's done this several times. She knows nothing about this case and is just using your interest in the case to get you to view her channel and make money.

Also: she is a Holocaust denier, has theorized that Jews control the weather, accused school shooting survivors of being actors, supports Trump, etc. She's terrible and you should not give her views and likes because it just encourages her terribleness.

No, she doesn't. She's directly in contact with multiple members of production and has first hand accounts. Your accusations are baseless and conjecture. We'll continue quoting Owens along with the other parties such as Flaa and Hilton who witnesses have also provided information privately and publicly.

And your just going to ignore her history of antisemitism and conspiracy mongering?

I'm guessing you are someone who thinks Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds are evil, and who points to past examples of them being controlling, lying, or otherwise behaving badly as proof the are in the wrong here, yes?

But you are getting info on this conflict by someone who is known to spread lies and misinformation, and is known to engage in hateful stereotypes. Why aren't Candace Owens' past actions enough to make you distrust her here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still not a peep from Blake on Kevin Costner. I thought she wanted to be the voice for women?

Uh, the news came out today. Where's Baldoni? I thought his whole thing was holding me accountable for their treatment if women?

Justin’s never proclaimed himself to be the voice of victims of SH or SA. But Blake on the other hand just gave a long speech at the time 100 gala saying just that. Now another woman much less powerful than her comes out against an A lister and she’s quiet as a church mouse, just like she was with Harvey and Woody. I guess she stands up for “victims” only when she’s trying to steal a movie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:See? This person is serious. It’s not a troll or someone posing etc.

Hi dc mom. Why are you so threatened by Candace Owen’s?

What’s with the ad hominem arguments?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:See? This person is serious. It’s not a troll or someone posing etc.

Hi dc mom. Why are you so threatened by Candace Owen’s?

What’s with the ad hominem arguments?

I’m just saying that various Baldoni supporters really believe this awful stuff, like victims of SA/SH aren’t really victims if they later have a consensual relationship, or if they benefitted later, etc, or that Candace Owens is a good and reliable source of info. Or the ugly name calling and appearance bashing someone engages in when they get mad. This isn’t some troll pretending. This is just the level at which some Baldoni supporters are operating. Stop blaming us for it. You own it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:See? This person is serious. It’s not a troll or someone posing etc.

Hi dc mom. Why are you so threatened by Candace Owen’s?

What’s with the ad hominem arguments?

I’m just saying that various Baldoni supporters really believe this awful stuff, like victims of SA/SH aren’t really victims if they later have a consensual relationship, or if they benefitted later, etc, or that Candace Owens is a good and reliable source of info. Or the ugly name calling and appearance bashing someone engages in when they get mad. This isn’t some troll pretending. This is just the level at which some Baldoni supporters are operating. Stop blaming us for it. You own it.

Huh? Having a consensual relationship with a predator for a decade doesn’t make rhe predator less a predator. I said in every one of my posts that he should have been fired. But it does take her individually out of the victim category when she voluntarily follows him from job to job. She only reported him because he broke up with her. Can only imagine what her colleagues at each stop thought of her knowing she was hired because she was sleeping with him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:See? This person is serious. It’s not a troll or someone posing etc.

Hi dc mom. Why are you so threatened by Candace Owen’s?

What’s with the ad hominem arguments?

I’m just saying that various Baldoni supporters really believe this awful stuff, like victims of SA/SH aren’t really victims if they later have a consensual relationship, or if they benefitted later, etc, or that Candace Owens is a good and reliable source of info. Or the ugly name calling and appearance bashing someone engages in when they get mad. This isn’t some troll pretending. This is just the level at which some Baldoni supporters are operating. Stop blaming us for it. You own it.

That’s maybe like 5% of the posts I’ve seen. Sorry, you try to paint a broad stroke but it’s not accurate.

And your side is completely disgusting on so many levels. Truly heinous. How dare you run to complain when someone comments on the appearance of a Hollywood actress who has made millions of her looks and clothes? Please. You’re utterly ridiculous.