US Capitol Breached by Trump's lunatics - The Commision Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"A two-hour special featuring heavily and highly selectively edited snippets from the hearing along with in-depth profiles of the Trump-hating socialists behind the dais."

Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"A two-hour special featuring heavily and highly selectively edited snippets from the hearing along with in-depth profiles of the Trump-hating socialists behind the dais."

Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.

[…]

Make whatever excuses you like, everyone already knows that Republicans like you are determined to ignore the truth about your party trying to overthrow the government.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"A two-hour special featuring heavily and highly selectively edited snippets from the hearing along with in-depth profiles of the Trump-hating socialists behind the dais."

Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.

You sound like a fool then. I would watch a literal circus if it meant being able to find out more about what happened that day. What bit I saw live on TV was outrageous (there's optics for you) and I want to know who is behind it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"A two-hour special featuring heavily and highly selectively edited snippets from the hearing along with in-depth profiles of the Trump-hating socialists behind the dais."

Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.

You sound like a fool then. I would watch a literal circus if it meant being able to find out more about what happened that day. What bit I saw live on TV was outrageous (there's optics for you) and I want to know who is behind it.

Oh, and by now everyone know it wasn't ANTIFA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"A two-hour special featuring heavily and highly selectively edited snippets from the hearing along with in-depth profiles of the Trump-hating socialists behind the dais."

then maybe fox should show the unabridged version, like cspan does, with zero commentary and bias. Right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"A two-hour special featuring heavily and highly selectively edited snippets from the hearing along with in-depth profiles of the Trump-hating socialists behind the dais."

then maybe fox should show the unabridged version, like cspan does, with zero commentary and bias. Right?

After the first hearing last year Laura Ingraham called the wounded officers who testified “crisis actors.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"A two-hour special featuring heavily and highly selectively edited snippets from the hearing along with in-depth profiles of the Trump-hating socialists behind the dais."

Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.

You sound like a fool then. I would watch a literal circus if it meant being able to find out more about what happened that day. What bit I saw live on TV was outrageous (there's optics for you) and I want to know who is behind it.

+1

The GOP’s concern about “security” and the like only extend to beating up on Democrats.

And this wasn’t for optics, con PP?:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"A two-hour special featuring heavily and highly selectively edited snippets from the hearing along with in-depth profiles of the Trump-hating socialists behind the dais."

Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.

Welcome, Traitors! 500,000 American soldiers died in WWII to protect democracy and you hand it over to a fat-assed, lying clown with an elaborate combover. MAGA!

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

So, the RICO component of this, Eastman writing a brief outlining what would happen if the 1/6 Congressional proceedings were delayed, along with the coordination of the proud boys, oath keepers etc to, you know, delay the proceedings, seems kind of bad.

[Anonymous]

This testimony should be good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"A two-hour special featuring heavily and highly selectively edited snippets from the hearing along with in-depth profiles of the Trump-hating socialists behind the dais."

Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.

Kind of obvious why Fox isn't covering it. It would be incredibly awkward to have their viewers find out that Fox talking heads were coordinating the whole thing with Trump. Do you really expect them to publicly broadcast their involvement in a coup?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"A two-hour special featuring heavily and highly selectively edited snippets from the hearing along with in-depth profiles of the Trump-hating socialists behind the dais."

Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"A two-hour special featuring heavily and highly selectively edited snippets from the hearing along with in-depth profiles of the Trump-hating socialists behind the dais."

Glad they are not covering it. I have no intention of watching a piece produced by a former ABC exec who, by the way, happened to spike the story about Jeffrey Epstein.
If they have to hire a TV producer to choreograph a hearing, they are going for drama. With Democrats, it's all about the optics.

Welcome, Traitors! 500,000 American soldiers died in WWII to protect democracy and you hand it over to a fat-assed, lying clown with an elaborate combover. MAGA!

MAGA!

[Anonymous]

I'm really not surprised that FOX News won't be broadcasting the hearings tonight. Their core audience might learn they are actually the traitors to the republic.