LMVSC town hall

[Anonymous]

Say, what are the results for FC Frederick/Loudoun? Oh I'm only referring to LMVSC teams, not aaaaaaall the fill-in teams.

[Anonymous]

D.C. probably wanted to be able to coach his son, and coach him from year to year.

Arlington will rotate coaches every year or two and he would probably not get to coach his own kid per club policy.

[Anonymous]

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:Is this team actually PAC?

https://events.gotsport.com/events/schedule.aspx?eventid=80847&FieldID=0&applicationID=5961004&action=Go

I heard the results they haven't updated weren't bad.

Yes, this is PAC. PAC has teams playing in LMVSC's place in the 2009 boys and 2007 girls. It would be great when the club decides to update the scores as it appears CCL has been catching some heat base on their disclaimer on their website now that puts the blame on the home team club not entering scores.

07 girls, too? Didn't know that.

Strange that CCL lists that team as LMVSC, even with an LMVSC coach. That'll mess up YouthSoccerRankings, that's for sure.

Rumor has it they’re taking LMVSC’s spot next season.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:Is this team actually PAC?

https://events.gotsport.com/events/schedule.aspx?eventid=80847&FieldID=0&applicationID=5961004&action=Go

I heard the results they haven't updated weren't bad.

Yes, this is PAC. PAC has teams playing in LMVSC's place in the 2009 boys and 2007 girls. It would be great when the club decides to update the scores as it appears CCL has been catching some heat base on their disclaimer on their website now that puts the blame on the home team club not entering scores.

07 girls, too? Didn't know that.

Strange that CCL lists that team as LMVSC, even with an LMVSC coach. That'll mess up YouthSoccerRankings, that's for sure.

Rumor has it they’re taking LMVSC’s spot next season.

PAC? Nowhere near enough teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:Is this team actually PAC?

https://events.gotsport.com/events/schedule.aspx?eventid=80847&FieldID=0&applicationID=5961004&action=Go

I heard the results they haven't updated weren't bad.

Yes, this is PAC. PAC has teams playing in LMVSC's place in the 2009 boys and 2007 girls. It would be great when the club decides to update the scores as it appears CCL has been catching some heat base on their disclaimer on their website now that puts the blame on the home team club not entering scores.

07 girls, too? Didn't know that.

Strange that CCL lists that team as LMVSC, even with an LMVSC coach. That'll mess up YouthSoccerRankings, that's for sure.

Rumor has it they’re taking LMVSC’s spot next season.

More teams than LMVSC and seem to be more competitive.

On a side note, did Loudoun forfeit games in the older girls groups? Schedule shows forfeit but does not indicate who forfeited. Due to LMVSC's inability to update scores, it can be assumed that Loudoun updated for their inability to field a team in the age groups.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:Is this team actually PAC?

https://events.gotsport.com/events/schedule.aspx?eventid=80847&FieldID=0&applicationID=5961004&action=Go

I heard the results they haven't updated weren't bad.

Yes, this is PAC. PAC has teams playing in LMVSC's place in the 2009 boys and 2007 girls. It would be great when the club decides to update the scores as it appears CCL has been catching some heat base on their disclaimer on their website now that puts the blame on the home team club not entering scores.

07 girls, too? Didn't know that.

Strange that CCL lists that team as LMVSC, even with an LMVSC coach. That'll mess up YouthSoccerRankings, that's for sure.

Rumor has it they’re taking LMVSC’s spot next season.

PAC? Nowhere near enough teams.

Nowhere near enough teams? LMVSC is missing:
02 boys, 02 girls, 03 girls, 04 boys, 04 girls, 05 boys, 06 girls, 07 girls, 08 girls, 09 boys, and I think 11 and 12 girls

Not sure “not enough teams” is a problem for CCL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:Is this team actually PAC?

https://events.gotsport.com/events/schedule.aspx?eventid=80847&FieldID=0&applicationID=5961004&action=Go

I heard the results they haven't updated weren't bad.

Yes, this is PAC. PAC has teams playing in LMVSC's place in the 2009 boys and 2007 girls. It would be great when the club decides to update the scores as it appears CCL has been catching some heat base on their disclaimer on their website now that puts the blame on the home team club not entering scores.

07 girls, too? Didn't know that.

Strange that CCL lists that team as LMVSC, even with an LMVSC coach. That'll mess up YouthSoccerRankings, that's for sure.

Rumor has it they’re taking LMVSC’s spot next season.

PAC? Nowhere near enough teams.

Nowhere near enough teams? LMVSC is missing:
02 boys, 02 girls, 03 girls, 04 boys, 04 girls, 05 boys, 06 girls, 07 girls, 08 girls, 09 boys, and I think 11 and 12 girls

Not sure “not enough teams” is a problem for CCL

Pretty sure PAC is happy where they are. They are super small on the Girls side and NCSL is a fit for most of their teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:Is this team actually PAC?

https://events.gotsport.com/events/schedule.aspx?eventid=80847&FieldID=0&applicationID=5961004&action=Go

I heard the results they haven't updated weren't bad.

Yes, this is PAC. PAC has teams playing in LMVSC's place in the 2009 boys and 2007 girls. It would be great when the club decides to update the scores as it appears CCL has been catching some heat base on their disclaimer on their website now that puts the blame on the home team club not entering scores.

07 girls, too? Didn't know that.

Strange that CCL lists that team as LMVSC, even with an LMVSC coach. That'll mess up YouthSoccerRankings, that's for sure.

Rumor has it they’re taking LMVSC’s spot next season.

PAC? Nowhere near enough teams.

Nowhere near enough teams? LMVSC is missing:
02 boys, 02 girls, 03 girls, 04 boys, 04 girls, 05 boys, 06 girls, 07 girls, 08 girls, 09 boys, and I think 11 and 12 girls

Not sure “not enough teams” is a problem for CCL

Pretty sure PAC is happy where they are. They are super small on the Girls side and NCSL is a fit for most of their teams.

And that’s awesome they listen to their members; we’re not exactly enjoying our CCL experience.

[Anonymous]

LMVSC has an 02 boys team. Played against them.

[Anonymous]

Where are all the PAC girls teams?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LMVSC has an 02 boys team. Played against them.

Thank you, update here:
LMVSC is missing 02 girls, 03 girls, 04 boys, 04 girls, 05 boys, 06 girls, 07 girls, 08 girls, 09 boys, and I think 11 and 12 girls

[Anonymous]

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:Is this team actually PAC?

https://events.gotsport.com/events/schedule.aspx?eventid=80847&FieldID=0&applicationID=5961004&action=Go

I heard the results they haven't updated weren't bad.

Yes, this is PAC. PAC has teams playing in LMVSC's place in the 2009 boys and 2007 girls. It would be great when the club decides to update the scores as it appears CCL has been catching some heat base on their disclaimer on their website now that puts the blame on the home team club not entering scores.

07 girls, too? Didn't know that.

Strange that CCL lists that team as LMVSC, even with an LMVSC coach. That'll mess up YouthSoccerRankings, that's for sure.

Rumor has it they’re taking LMVSC’s spot next season.

PAC? Nowhere near enough teams.

Nowhere near enough teams? LMVSC is missing:
02 boys, 02 girls, 03 girls, 04 boys, 04 girls, 05 boys, 06 girls, 07 girls, 08 girls, 09 boys, and I think 11 and 12 girls

Not sure “not enough teams” is a problem for CCL

PAC's complete list of teams (aside from the two playing in the LMVSC slot) is here: http://www.ncsl-soccer.com/_element_display/#%2F80738%2Fteams%2Fclub%2F60577575.html%3Frnd%3D1603303630706

They actually have more D1 teams than they used to, which is probably half natural fluctuation and half a function of clubs running to EDP and elsewhere.

Why does LMVSC have teams in nearly every age group in NCSL? Most of them are "White," so you'd have to think the "Red" is in CCL, right? http://www.ncsl-soccer.com/_element_display/#%2F80738%2Fteams%2Fclub%2F15599452.html%3Frnd%3D1603304032054

I'll recommend PAC's coaches to anyone. They don't have the infrastructure to go CCL.

virtually all of the ncsl teams are not in div 1, and, they are struggling

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:Is this team actually PAC?

https://events.gotsport.com/events/schedule.aspx?eventid=80847&FieldID=0&applicationID=5961004&action=Go

I heard the results they haven't updated weren't bad.

Yes, this is PAC. PAC has teams playing in LMVSC's place in the 2009 boys and 2007 girls. It would be great when the club decides to update the scores as it appears CCL has been catching some heat base on their disclaimer on their website now that puts the blame on the home team club not entering scores.

07 girls, too? Didn't know that.

Strange that CCL lists that team as LMVSC, even with an LMVSC coach. That'll mess up YouthSoccerRankings, that's for sure.

Rumor has it they’re taking LMVSC’s spot next season.

PAC? Nowhere near enough teams.

Nowhere near enough teams? LMVSC is missing:
02 boys, 02 girls, 03 girls, 04 boys, 04 girls, 05 boys, 06 girls, 07 girls, 08 girls, 09 boys, and I think 11 and 12 girls

Not sure “not enough teams” is a problem for CCL

PAC's complete list of teams (aside from the two playing in the LMVSC slot) is here: http://www.ncsl-soccer.com/_element_display/#%2F80738%2Fteams%2Fclub%2F60577575.html%3Frnd%3D1603303630706

They actually have more D1 teams than they used to, which is probably half natural fluctuation and half a function of clubs running to EDP and elsewhere.

Why does LMVSC have teams in nearly every age group in NCSL? Most of them are "White," so you'd have to think the "Red" is in CCL, right? http://www.ncsl-soccer.com/_element_display/#%2F80738%2Fteams%2Fclub%2F15599452.html%3Frnd%3D1603304032054

I'll recommend PAC's coaches to anyone. They don't have the infrastructure to go CCL.

virtually all of the ncsl teams are not in div 1, and, they are struggling

07 Navy Boys are division 1.
I heard they are bringing a few really goods kids up from their 07 white team and they think they will be a to 5 team in the state next year at u15.
My ds is a u15 with pac this year. We are a decent team but not as good as the 07 team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:Is this team actually PAC?

https://events.gotsport.com/events/schedule.aspx?eventid=80847&FieldID=0&applicationID=5961004&action=Go

I heard the results they haven't updated weren't bad.

Yes, this is PAC. PAC has teams playing in LMVSC's place in the 2009 boys and 2007 girls. It would be great when the club decides to update the scores as it appears CCL has been catching some heat base on their disclaimer on their website now that puts the blame on the home team club not entering scores.

07 girls, too? Didn't know that.

Strange that CCL lists that team as LMVSC, even with an LMVSC coach. That'll mess up YouthSoccerRankings, that's for sure.

Rumor has it they’re taking LMVSC’s spot next season.

PAC? Nowhere near enough teams.

Nowhere near enough teams? LMVSC is missing:
02 boys, 02 girls, 03 girls, 04 boys, 04 girls, 05 boys, 06 girls, 07 girls, 08 girls, 09 boys, and I think 11 and 12 girls

Not sure “not enough teams” is a problem for CCL

PAC's complete list of teams (aside from the two playing in the LMVSC slot) is here: http://www.ncsl-soccer.com/_element_display/#%2F80738%2Fteams%2Fclub%2F60577575.html%3Frnd%3D1603303630706

They actually have more D1 teams than they used to, which is probably half natural fluctuation and half a function of clubs running to EDP and elsewhere.

Why does LMVSC have teams in nearly every age group in NCSL? Most of them are "White," so you'd have to think the "Red" is in CCL, right? http://www.ncsl-soccer.com/_element_display/#%2F80738%2Fteams%2Fclub%2F15599452.html%3Frnd%3D1603304032054

I'll recommend PAC's coaches to anyone. They don't have the infrastructure to go CCL.

virtually all of the ncsl teams are not in div 1, and, they are struggling

07 Navy Boys are division 1.
I heard they are bringing a few really goods kids up from their 07 white team and they think they will be a to 5 team in the state next year at u15.
My ds is a u15 with pac this year. We are a decent team but not as good as the 07 team.

PAC has earned the right to take LMVSC’s CCL spot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:Is this team actually PAC?

https://events.gotsport.com/events/schedule.aspx?eventid=80847&FieldID=0&applicationID=5961004&action=Go

I heard the results they haven't updated weren't bad.

Yes, this is PAC. PAC has teams playing in LMVSC's place in the 2009 boys and 2007 girls. It would be great when the club decides to update the scores as it appears CCL has been catching some heat base on their disclaimer on their website now that puts the blame on the home team club not entering scores.

07 girls, too? Didn't know that.

Strange that CCL lists that team as LMVSC, even with an LMVSC coach. That'll mess up YouthSoccerRankings, that's for sure.

Rumor has it they’re taking LMVSC’s spot next season.

PAC? Nowhere near enough teams.

Nowhere near enough teams? LMVSC is missing:
02 boys, 02 girls, 03 girls, 04 boys, 04 girls, 05 boys, 06 girls, 07 girls, 08 girls, 09 boys, and I think 11 and 12 girls

Not sure “not enough teams” is a problem for CCL

PAC's complete list of teams (aside from the two playing in the LMVSC slot) is here: http://www.ncsl-soccer.com/_element_display/#%2F80738%2Fteams%2Fclub%2F60577575.html%3Frnd%3D1603303630706

They actually have more D1 teams than they used to, which is probably half natural fluctuation and half a function of clubs running to EDP and elsewhere.

Why does LMVSC have teams in nearly every age group in NCSL? Most of them are "White," so you'd have to think the "Red" is in CCL, right? http://www.ncsl-soccer.com/_element_display/#%2F80738%2Fteams%2Fclub%2F15599452.html%3Frnd%3D1603304032054

I'll recommend PAC's coaches to anyone. They don't have the infrastructure to go CCL.

virtually all of the ncsl teams are not in div 1, and, they are struggling

07 Navy Boys are division 1.
I heard they are bringing a few really goods kids up from their 07 white team and they think they will be a to 5 team in the state next year at u15.
My ds is a u15 with pac this year. We are a decent team but not as good as the 07 team.

Not a bad team but 5th in state? They are 6 in their own division. Not lmvsc member.