Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Article from 2021 about the declassification:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9165821/In-one-final-acts-Trump-declassifies-documents-FBIs-Russia-probe.htm

Bad link, sorry:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9165821/In-one-final-acts-Trump-declassifies-documents-FBIs-Russia-probe.html

That didn't help. It still links to Daily Mail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, not Crossfire Hurricane related at all.
FBI searched Trump’s home to look for nuclear documents and other items, sources say
https://wapo.st/3SIMXTa (no paywall)

There were 15+10 boxes of documents. It could be both. And more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sources confirming FBI siezed materials classified as Top Secret. Trump isn’t going to find the Alexandria Detention Center to his liking. No hamberders.

The President retains his clearance and can declassify anything he wants. And did. Publicly stated.

At this point, a huge percentage of the American people do not, and will not, believe anything that's said.

If he had declassified all of it there would be a proper paper trail, and he still couldn’t take them with him because they’re the property of the U.S. Government.

He stated that he was declassifying all of it. Publicly. To the American public. And if that wasn't done, who's fault is that? Legal dragged their feet. They didn't follow through. You best tell Obama he wasn't allowed to take papers because he told a TON of pages

You don’t just tweet something saying you’re going to declassify it. There’s a process. If the “best people” in your administration don’t follow up, they’re not declassified. And there’s also a different process that Obama and every other President has followed when legally procuring Presidential records for their libraries. Trump didn’t do any of this.

This is not correct. Trump sought to declassify TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMISSIBLE certain documents pertaining to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation as contained in a binder provided to DOJ and DNI. The FBI and intelligence community raised objections to the declassification and it therefore did not occur. Additionally, Trump tweeted about declassifying the entirety of the Mueller Report but when Judge Reggie Walton made an inquiry about whether this constituted an official presidential order, Mark Meadows advised the court that it did not.

What's the Crossfire Hurricane investigation?

The FBI investigation into the unprecedented amount of Russian contacts with Trump and his campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Article from 2021 about the declassification:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9165821/In-one-final-acts-Trump-declassifies-documents-FBIs-Russia-probe.htm

Bad link, sorry:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9165821/In-one-final-acts-Trump-declassifies-documents-FBIs-Russia-probe.html

That didn't help. It still links to Daily Mail.

😀

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Obviously nothing to see here!

So, Donald was trying to sell information on our nuclear capability to our adversaries. Is not this treason in the legal sense?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Obviously nothing to see here!

I hope and pray this is just my progressive friends getting facts wrong. Because if true, this would be a huge security issue. We overclassify things. I read various reports and wonder why stuff is classified. But of all the things that should be closely guarded, I can’t think of much more relevant than our nuclear secrets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Obviously nothing to see here!

So, Donald was trying to sell information on our nuclear capability to our adversaries. Is not this treason in the legal sense?

I'm dying to see the search warrant because it should cite the specific laws Trump is accused of breaking. Is 18 U.S. Code §793 (Espionage Act) on there?

[Anonymous]

Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were executed for this. And, in an ironic twist, Trump mentor, Roy Cohn helped with their prosecution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, not Crossfire Hurricane related at all.
FBI searched Trump’s home to look for nuclear documents and other items, sources say
https://wapo.st/3SIMXTa (no paywall)

There were 15+10 boxes of documents. It could be both. And more.

This reeks of a reporter being played.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were executed for this. And, in an ironic twist, Trump mentor, Roy Cohn helped with their prosecution.

If that happens, they better have ironclad evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Obviously nothing to see here!

I hope and pray this is just my progressive friends getting facts wrong. Because if true, this would be a huge security issue. We overclassify things. I read various reports and wonder why stuff is classified. But of all the things that should be closely guarded, I can’t think of much more relevant than our nuclear secrets.

That's rich, because about 5:30, Gorka stated that they better find the nuclear football. Looks like they watch the War Room over at the DOJ.

[Anonymous]

Wow.
I went from being “let down” that Trump had just stolen documents to help rehab his image.
To finding out he might have stolen information about our nuclear weapons and missing the good old days when I was just feeling “let down”.

[Anonymous]

The US hasn't yet reached a level where the POTUS can dictate laws by tweets. He often tweeted BS. Thankfully, our government doesn't operate based on the whims of a stupid man's tweets.

I realize that Trump and his stupid followers don't realize that, though. But, ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Sorry, not sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Obviously nothing to see here!

I hope and pray this is just my progressive friends getting facts wrong. Because if true, this would be a huge security issue. We overclassify things. I read various reports and wonder why stuff is classified. But of all the things that should be closely guarded, I can’t think of much more relevant than our nuclear secrets.

It doesn’t specify whose nuclear weapons. Just as likely that it could be an assessment of an ally or geopolitical adversary. Disclosure of either would be a colossal intelligence issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Obviously nothing to see here!

So, Donald was trying to sell information on our nuclear capability to our adversaries. Is not this treason in the legal sense?

I'm dying to see the search warrant because it should cite the specific laws Trump is accused of breaking. Is 18 U.S. Code §793 (Espionage Act) on there?

The NSD-Counterintelligence Section wouldn’t be leading the charge if 793 was not featured prominently in the warrant and underlying affidavit.