Unless the husband is rich.
Women do most of the unpaid and unnoticed domestic labor in the home. They use their body to create babies and then do most of the childcare. If the husband isn’t rich, what does he bring to the table? |
Very little, unless he genuinely tends to his wife's physical and mental needs. |
If you were bringing as much to the table as you seem to think, you would have been able to attract one of those rich husbands. |
What a fresh, original concept for a thread. More please! |
Some historian noted that when women enter a profession en masse that was previously only open to men, it consequently becomes low status. Good to see women flooding the redpill/(W)GTOW arena 10 years later—-perhaps inceldom/femceldom will become low status at last! |
My husband is rich and it’s still a horrible deal. Don’t let the money fool you |
Most men are also unable to meet a woman’s emotional and intellectual needs as well. They need to be used for their wallet and their sperm. |
I do agree with that. As a woman who makes around 300K I work many more hours than men in the same position (they make half a million). I also was routinely passed on promotions, given more admin tasks at work, which resulted in me taking more time/efforts to climb up. If you add the child birth and household duties on top of that (men are traditionally are not great at that, so working women still pull off most on the home front), this results in a huge tax on woman's body, time and own financial stability.
I went through this in my marriage (my ex was well paid, we were roughly equal but he didn't pull off the home duties), and I do not want to remarry unless a candidate can offer a really great lifestyle, which would take many daily tasks off my table. For example, if I could work less hours when I am with my partner, if he is indeed an equal contributor at home, with kids etc. Men should bring more to the table financially if they are not pulling it off at home. I think I will be partnered but won't remarry after my divorce as it's objectively hard to find such a husband. I've met many guys who are working low stress jobs, live in messy places, travel cheaply, play music after 6pm devoting time to their hobbies and interests, and they don't plan to change their lifestyle for a woman. Being with someone like that would result in me working again like a horse while he rests aside |
If the husband is rich he’ll want his kids to have a SAHM and control you (the SAHM) with money. |
It's the motherhood that's a raw deal. |
SAHM is still a better deal than pulling both corporate career and childbirth. Women who tell their rich husbands it's either or are in fact smart! This is the only way to stay sane and not totally exhausted in marriage |
Until you get divorced. Average child support is $5k/year. |
Being a single mother who isn’t poor is the best. |
Well, if the exH was rich, and she's indeed smart, she will get a settlement that makes any job redundant. |
On average yes. It used to be the only way to get protection as the man worked and provided for the woman. No wonder women didn't get their own bank accounts or cpuld own property until quite recently. As soon as women have the ability to make their own money, control childbirth they will not give up that freedom for anything less than what they want in a partner. |