Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/26/kavanaugh-accuser-christine-ford-releases-results-polygraph-test-but-key-detail-appears-to-contradict-past-statements.html

I don't like fox news but this article is interesting

So maybe a polygraph is more helpful if you're using it to see how someone responds to a particular question.

Asking the murderer who knows he murdered someone with an usual weapon:

Did you kill her with a gun? (No response)
Did you kill her with a knife? (No response)
Did you kill her with a banana? (Off the charts!)


Is that how they are supposed to be used?

I suppose it could also see if she has some response to being asked if she made anything up, but maybe that's not how a polygraph is supposed to work

Sure would be nice if the senate judiciary committee had questioned the person who gave the polygraph! Sure would have been helpful to have the FBI investigation started before they forced the vote!
Only one side is scared of those things. The GOP should be ashamed of themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is zero change Judge is going to admit to any kind of assault or attempted assault. What he *might* MIGHT admit to is a level of drinking that Brett has denied.

Again, Brett did indeed admit to being drunk. Many times he admitted it. There was no denial there. Your statement about a 'level of drunk' cannot be substantiated because there is no physical measure of such. It would just be opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/26/kavanaugh-accuser-christine-ford-releases-results-polygraph-test-but-key-detail-appears-to-contradict-past-statements.html

I don't like fox news but this article is interesting

So maybe a polygraph is more helpful if you're using it to see how someone responds to a particular question.

Asking the murderer who knows he murdered someone with an usual weapon:

Did you kill her with a gun? (No response)
Did you kill her with a knife? (No response)
Did you kill her with a banana? (Off the charts!)


Is that how they are supposed to be used?

I suppose it could also see if she has some response to being asked if she made anything up, but maybe that's not how a polygraph is supposed to work

Sure would be nice if the senate judiciary committee had questioned the person who gave the polygraph! Sure would have been helpful to have the FBI investigation started before they forced the vote!
Only one side is scared of those things. The GOP should be ashamed of themselves.

Her lawyers would NEVER let her be hooked up to an independent polygraph after that testimony. EVER. They will ask many more questions of her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whatever you believe there is one thing I take away from this:

I'm scared to live in a world where we will believe something just because someone says it (whether you believe Ford or Bk). There is literally no proof in either direction. No witnesses really saying anything substantial on either side.

But regardless half are believing one side and the other half are believing the other side. With literally no proof. Am I the only one who finds this terrifying?

I guess you’re not a black man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a little scary that those women were able to harass Flake in an elevator. He didn’t sexually assault anyone. Where was security? They should seek therapy and protest through legal channels rather than harassing and cornering an innocent man in an elevator. Excuse me if I don’t think that these bullies were heroes. And BTW, I say this as a sexual assault victim.

They didn’t harass him!!! We still live in a world where we can speak to our elected officials!! Giving your opinion to an elected official is actually a part of the franchise of democracy!

You must be joking. This woman and her minions got up in Flake's face, *screaming* at him. They absolutely harassed him and I can't believe people like that are allowed in the building, much less allowed to approach lawmakers in that way. Plenty of guards were just standing around and no one pulled her away from Flake. What a lunatic. If she wanted to "speak" to her elected officials, she should have done so respectfully. But she didn't even come close.

Did Kavanaugh speak to elected representatives respectfully yesterday? Nope.

If you accused ME of doing what he’s been accused of doing...and then I had to sit down in front of a room full of people who had just finished telling my accuser “I believe you” without hearing me emphatically deny the accusations first, I think “respectful” would be a pretty difficult time for me to strike.

That is funny because many people go to court EVERY DAY to defend themselves - actual court where the stakes are million times higher than he faced here. Not getting his dream job??? Sorry, no. How about people facing the death penalty, life in prison, losing custody of their kids? Any defendant would be thrown out of court for contempt if they did what he did, and as a judge, he knows it.

Don't fall for the faux outrage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a little scary that those women were able to harass Flake in an elevator. He didn’t sexually assault anyone. Where was security? They should seek therapy and protest through legal channels rather than harassing and cornering an innocent man in an elevator. Excuse me if I don’t think that these bullies were heroes. And BTW, I say this as a sexual assault victim.

They didn’t harass him!!! We still live in a world where we can speak to our elected officials!! Giving your opinion to an elected official is actually a part of the franchise of democracy!

You must be joking. This woman and her minions got up in Flake's face, *screaming* at him. They absolutely harassed him and I can't believe people like that are allowed in the building, much less allowed to approach lawmakers in that way. Plenty of guards were just standing around and no one pulled her away from Flake. What a lunatic. If she wanted to "speak" to her elected officials, she should have done so respectfully. But she didn't even come close.

Did Kavanaugh speak to elected representatives respectfully yesterday? Nope.

If you accused ME of doing what he’s been accused of doing...and then I had to sit down in front of a room full of people who had just finished telling my accuser “I believe you” without hearing me emphatically deny the accusations first, I think “respectful” would be a pretty difficult time for me to strike.

The GOPers already said they didn’t believe her and they couldn’t even question her themselves, had to bring in a ringer. Ford remained respectful. Why couldn’t he?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/26/kavanaugh-accuser-christine-ford-releases-results-polygraph-test-but-key-detail-appears-to-contradict-past-statements.html

I don't like fox news but this article is interesting

So maybe a polygraph is more helpful if you're using it to see how someone responds to a particular question.

Asking the murderer who knows he murdered someone with an usual weapon:

Did you kill her with a gun? (No response)
Did you kill her with a knife? (No response)
Did you kill her with a banana? (Off the charts!)


Is that how they are supposed to be used?

I suppose it could also see if she has some response to being asked if she made anything up, but maybe that's not how a polygraph is supposed to work

Sure would be nice if the senate judiciary committee had questioned the person who gave the polygraph! Sure would have been helpful to have the FBI investigation started before they forced the vote!
Only one side is scared of those things. The GOP should be ashamed of themselves.

Her lawyers would NEVER let her be hooked up to an independent polygraph after that testimony. EVER. They will ask many more questions of her.

And Kavanaugh won't let himself take a polygraph - something he himself in his opinions (his WORK PRODUCT) said was a fantastic tool for law enforcement!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero change Judge is going to admit to any kind of assault or attempted assault. What he *might* MIGHT admit to is a level of drinking that Brett has denied.

Again, Brett did indeed admit to being drunk. Many times he admitted it. There was no denial there. Your statement about a 'level of drunk' cannot be substantiated because there is no physical measure of such. It would just be opinion.

grasping grasping grasping

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a little scary that those women were able to harass Flake in an elevator. He didn’t sexually assault anyone. Where was security? They should seek therapy and protest through legal channels rather than harassing and cornering an innocent man in an elevator. Excuse me if I don’t think that these bullies were heroes. And BTW, I say this as a sexual assault victim.

They didn’t harass him!!! We still live in a world where we can speak to our elected officials!! Giving your opinion to an elected official is actually a part of the franchise of democracy!

You must be joking. This woman and her minions got up in Flake's face, *screaming* at him. They absolutely harassed him and I can't believe people like that are allowed in the building, much less allowed to approach lawmakers in that way. Plenty of guards were just standing around and no one pulled her away from Flake. What a lunatic. If she wanted to "speak" to her elected officials, she should have done so respectfully. But she didn't even come close.

Did Kavanaugh speak to elected representatives respectfully yesterday? Nope.

If you accused ME of doing what he’s been accused of doing...and then I had to sit down in front of a room full of people who had just finished telling my accuser “I believe you” without hearing me emphatically deny the accusations first, I think “respectful” would be a pretty difficult time for me to strike.

The GOPers already said they didn’t believe her and they couldn’t even question her themselves, had to bring in a ringer. Ford remained respectful. Why couldn’t he?

They wanted to question her themselves. Ford's team claimed she was afraid. So they brought in a woman. Then she claimed she was afraid of her too. The woman is a basket case.

[Anonymous]

NPR reporting that a supplemental investigation by the FBI will take place into the allegations against K. They say McConnel has agreed that the FBI will do a supplemental background check limited to credible allegations against Brett. The investigation will last no longer than one week.

This isn't good news for Brettie, especially since Judge as agreed to talk to the FBI. I have zero sympathy for BK. If he hadn't lied so much, I'd believe he had some integrity, but his lies belie the truth about him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Big Brain Brett

https://www.instagram.com/p/BoQ3RYIFEGB/?taken-by=elarapictures

This is what I’ve been waiting for all day!

Just quoting this hilarious thing for people on this page of the thread who might have missed it

SO FUNNY!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero change Judge is going to admit to any kind of assault or attempted assault. What he *might* MIGHT admit to is a level of drinking that Brett has denied.

Again, Brett did indeed admit to being drunk. Many times he admitted it. There was no denial there. Your statement about a 'level of drunk' cannot be substantiated because there is no physical measure of such. It would just be opinion.

grasping grasping grasping

Can you determine level of drunk and what another remembers with uncanny accuracy? How will that be proven without a measurable number?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a little scary that those women were able to harass Flake in an elevator. He didn’t sexually assault anyone. Where was security? They should seek therapy and protest through legal channels rather than harassing and cornering an innocent man in an elevator. Excuse me if I don’t think that these bullies were heroes. And BTW, I say this as a sexual assault victim.

They didn’t harass him!!! We still live in a world where we can speak to our elected officials!! Giving your opinion to an elected official is actually a part of the franchise of democracy!

You must be joking. This woman and her minions got up in Flake's face, *screaming* at him. They absolutely harassed him and I can't believe people like that are allowed in the building, much less allowed to approach lawmakers in that way. Plenty of guards were just standing around and no one pulled her away from Flake. What a lunatic. If she wanted to "speak" to her elected officials, she should have done so respectfully. But she didn't even come close.

Did Kavanaugh speak to elected representatives respectfully yesterday? Nope.

If you accused ME of doing what he’s been accused of doing...and then I had to sit down in front of a room full of people who had just finished telling my accuser “I believe you” without hearing me emphatically deny the accusations first, I think “respectful” would be a pretty difficult time for me to strike.

That is funny because many people go to court EVERY DAY to defend themselves - actual court where the stakes are million times higher than he faced here. Not getting his dream job??? Sorry, no. How about people facing the death penalty, life in prison, losing custody of their kids? Any defendant would be thrown out of court for contempt if they did what he did, and as a judge, he knows it.

Don't fall for the faux outrage.

This. FFS, he is applying to be a Justice. If he can't keep his shit together for this, he is absolutely unfit for that position.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NPR reporting that a supplemental investigation by the FBI will take place into the allegations against K. They say McConnel has agreed that the FBI will do a supplemental background check limited to credible allegations against Brett. The investigation will last no longer than one week.

This isn't good news for Brettie, especially since Judge as agreed to talk to the FBI. I have zero sympathy for BK. If he hadn't lied so much, I'd believe he had some integrity, but his lies belie the truth about him.

I think Avanetti's crazy will come out smelling like a rose on this one. LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a little scary that those women were able to harass Flake in an elevator. He didn’t sexually assault anyone. Where was security? They should seek therapy and protest through legal channels rather than harassing and cornering an innocent man in an elevator. Excuse me if I don’t think that these bullies were heroes. And BTW, I say this as a sexual assault victim.

They didn’t harass him!!! We still live in a world where we can speak to our elected officials!! Giving your opinion to an elected official is actually a part of the franchise of democracy!

You must be joking. This woman and her minions got up in Flake's face, *screaming* at him. They absolutely harassed him and I can't believe people like that are allowed in the building, much less allowed to approach lawmakers in that way. Plenty of guards were just standing around and no one pulled her away from Flake. What a lunatic. If she wanted to "speak" to her elected officials, she should have done so respectfully. But she didn't even come close.

Did Kavanaugh speak to elected representatives respectfully yesterday? Nope.

If you accused ME of doing what he’s been accused of doing...and then I had to sit down in front of a room full of people who had just finished telling my accuser “I believe you” without hearing me emphatically deny the accusations first, I think “respectful” would be a pretty difficult time for me to strike.

The GOPers already said they didn’t believe her and they couldn’t even question her themselves, had to bring in a ringer. Ford remained respectful. Why couldn’t he?

They wanted to question her themselves. Ford's team claimed she was afraid. So they brought in a woman. Then she claimed she was afraid of her too. The woman is a basket case.

Can you blame her? Look how they have treated her!