Official Trump VP thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just dumb poor white trash from Appalachia who enlisted on a whim as a teen during a hot war and gets the cushiest desk post there is. What are the odds.

There are no “desk jobs” for lower enlisted Marines on deployment.

I suggest those of you trashing his four-year military service read this. No, he did not see combat - as he VERY CLEARLY states in this piece. He did, however, learn a lot of very valuable lessons that it appears many of you have never learned.

https://www.stripes.com/theaters/us/2024-07-16/vance-trump-marines-vice-president-republicans-14505177.html

He very clearly states he was attached to units, when on missions and was in dangerous situations in unsecured areas. He got lucky that is wasn’t injured or killed, but he was most definitely in harms way and putting his life on the line. I worked as an active duty nurse and we had causalities from all different units and MOSs, not just infantry, including some of own nurses. So take a seat and stay in your lane.

PP here and I agree with you. I think you misunderstood what I was saying. Trolls have claimed that Vance made the claim that he "had seen combat," when in reality he had not. I was providing that link to show that he never made that claim - ever - and that in fact, he's very open about what his assignments were. I agree that he was in harm's way merely by being in the military. IOW, he never claimed to be anything he was not, unlike what the trolls would have everyone believe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The other weird thing about his wife being Hindu - not that I believe it but Catholics do - is that there is no way you would let your spouse, who you presume to love, risk burning in eternity by worshipping false gods. If you truly believed Catholicism was the only way to Heaven, you'd be getting her into your faith ASAP.

It would be one thing if she was Episcopalian or Lutheran. She worships completely different gods than Catholics. Multiple gods. It is completely invalid in the eyes of Rome.

Don't vote for him if you can't tolerate his marriage to a Hindu. My list of reasons to not vote for him is long but it does include that one. But if that is it for you, so be it.

Girl, be so for real. He could be married to my Episcopalian sister and I wouldn't vote for him.

I'm not saying his marriage to a Hindu is a reason to not vote for him. I'm saying it's evidence that he's not serious about being Catholic and that his conversion was for electoral purposes.

Please try to keep up with the thread.

DP. Are you the moron telling others to "keep up" when you yourself seem like the most ignorant person on this thread? You clearly know nothing about 1) religion or 2) respectful, equal marriages. I suggest you do some research.

Another DP. Vance said that his wife's devotion to her religion made him reconsider what religion could be his own life. Rome (you probably mean the part of Rome called The Vatican) is much more ecumenical than you may think He can be of one faith and his wife of another faith with completely different beliefs. You have no idea why he converted to Catholicism and it is odd that you are bearing false witness against a person; that is something Catholicism forbids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we actually know if she’s Brahmin

Why does this matter to you? Why are Democrats so obsessed with race and ethnicity?

Democrats aren't. Maybe you assume too much about anonymous posters. It's right wingers like Nick Fuentes who are obsessed with her race.

Nick Fuentes has to be a troll. He's just outrageous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems are so funny. Do you have anything to say other than snarky personal attacks?

+1. I love how they are using gay and religion as pejoratives when it suits their theme.

+ a million
Not to mention, misogyny and racism. This thread is a masterclass of the inner workings of the liberal "mind." The hypocrisy is truly something to behold.

It is interesting.

I don't like any and all of them

But seeing where progressives are going - hating on a woman for class, race, ethnicity. Not loving her appearance.

Yeah, that's going to turn out well.

Progressives being super as usual and absolutely destroying things for every other human being.

On brand

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He sets off my gaydar, sorry. And his mentor is a gay billionaire man. Probably another Republican closet case Ivy Leaguer who prefers men. An epidemic dating back to at least the 80s with the congressional page scandal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_congressional_page_sex_scandal

Why would that matter?

Exactly. Imagine someone sounding off like that about a Democrat. They would be lambasted as homophobic. But I guess it's ok to speculate since he's a Republican - just as they did with Tim Scott. Idiot hypocrites.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What in the H will Melania and Usha Vance talk about?

Doubtful that whatever they discuss will be in English.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just dumb poor white trash from Appalachia who enlisted on a whim as a teen during a hot war and gets the cushiest desk post there is. What are the odds.

There are no “desk jobs” for lower enlisted Marines on deployment.

I suggest those of you trashing his four-year military service read this. No, he did not see combat - as he VERY CLEARLY states in this piece. He did, however, learn a lot of very valuable lessons that it appears many of you have never learned.

https://www.stripes.com/theaters/us/2024-07-16/vance-trump-marines-vice-president-republicans-14505177.html

He very clearly states he was attached to units, when on missions and was in dangerous situations in unsecured areas. He got lucky that is wasn’t injured or killed, but he was most definitely in harms way and putting his life on the line. I worked as an active duty nurse and we had causalities from all different units and MOSs, not just infantry, including some of own nurses. So take a seat and stay in your lane.

Of course he would say that. He is self aggrandizing. Did he ever go door to door like actual fighters? Nope.

DP. He never said anything that was untrue. He was active-duty military, something that is probably a completely foreign concept to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He sets off my gaydar, sorry. And his mentor is a gay billionaire man. Probably another Republican closet case Ivy Leaguer who prefers men. An epidemic dating back to at least the 80s with the congressional page scandal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_congressional_page_sex_scandal

Why would that matter?

Exactly. Imagine someone sounding off like that about a Democrat. They would be lambasted as homophobic. But I guess it's ok to speculate since he's a Republican - just as they did with Tim Scott. Idiot hypocrites.

You guys currently have a conspiracy theory (that's pretty mainstream within your party, no?) that Obama and his private chef were gay lovers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The other weird thing about his wife being Hindu - not that I believe it but Catholics do - is that there is no way you would let your spouse, who you presume to love, risk burning in eternity by worshipping false gods. If you truly believed Catholicism was the only way to Heaven, you'd be getting her into your faith ASAP.

It would be one thing if she was Episcopalian or Lutheran. She worships completely different gods than Catholics. Multiple gods. It is completely invalid in the eyes of Rome.

Don't vote for him if you can't tolerate his marriage to a Hindu. My list of reasons to not vote for him is long but it does include that one. But if that is it for you, so be it.

Girl, be so for real. He could be married to my Episcopalian sister and I wouldn't vote for him.

I'm not saying his marriage to a Hindu is a reason to not vote for him. I'm saying it's evidence that he's not serious about being Catholic and that his conversion was for electoral purposes.

Please try to keep up with the thread.

DP. Are you the moron telling others to "keep up" when you yourself seem like the most ignorant person on this thread? You clearly know nothing about 1) religion or 2) respectful, equal marriages. I suggest you do some research.

Another DP. Vance said that his wife's devotion to her religion made him reconsider what religion could be his own life. Rome (you probably mean the part of Rome called The Vatican) is much more ecumenical than you may think He can be of one faith and his wife of another faith with completely different beliefs. You have no idea why he converted to Catholicism and it is odd that you are bearing false witness against a person; that is something Catholicism forbids.

Good thing I'm not Catholic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What in the H will Melania and Usha Vance talk about?

Doubtful that whatever they discuss will be in English.

What other common language do they speak?
Or do you think that there are only two languages in the world: English and "whatever everyone else speaks"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What in the H will Melania and Usha Vance talk about?

Doubtful that whatever they discuss will be in English.

What other common language do they speak?
Or do you think that there are only two languages in the world: English and "whatever everyone else speaks"?

They are both foreigners who can barely speak English.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does an alleged white trash teenager from Ohio get the cushiest Marines gig there is during a hot war at age 18? An intel gig writing articles in an air conditioned office for a few years. Wow, what a lucky break!

Can we all refrain from using the term "white trash"? It's really bigoted. Also the adjacent "trailer trash." And I say this as a Dem. It just plays into the criticism of Dems and their disdain for "deplorables." Maybe use something softer like "lower-income white teenager" from a "disadvantaged background" or some such thing.

Agree!
Here is a clip of Trump firing someone from the Apprentice for using that term. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3A-Z5sRwgLM
It will be nice to have someone with decency and integrity back in the White House.

Yes, because when one thinks of decency and integrity, one’s mind immediately goes to Trump. /s

lol so true!

He also didn't fire that guy for saying white trash because he opposed the use of the word. He fired that guy because he thought that jokingly describing yourself as white trash cheapened a brand. He actually said "Why would I buy something from white trash"

Bull$hit. He said, "Why would I buy something from someone who considers themselves 'white trash'." He said the term was offensive. But, you know that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if Haley and Scott turned him down or if Trump and his team are really dumb enough to believe Vance was the best choice.

How are those others a better choice? Vance is the best choice.

Vance adds nothing to this ticket. It's a doubling down on Trump and not bringing in anything new.

I have to say, I feel the tiniest bit better now. I was worried it was going to be Haley.

Agreed, and or Younkin!

No, Youngkin campaigned hard in the Virginia midterms for Republicans across the state and very few of them won. I know when he won the governorship, people had high hopes for him, but he turned out to be a dud who simply won with a combo of suburban moms who were angry about slow Covid school reopenings and a really bad/unmotivating opponent.

DP. Youngkin won because he was a great candidate. Sorry you're still upset that he won, but millions of us are very grateful he did. He's a good guy and an effective governor. Would have made a great VP too.

No, he got lucky with that McAuliffe quote about parents and schools. You being glad that he won doesn't negate the fact that he hasn't been able to get other Rs elected since then.

McAuliffe's moronic quote wasn't what got Youngkin elected. McAuliffe actually *being* a moron is what did it. It's fun to see how triggered you still are about this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What in the H will Melania and Usha Vance talk about?

Doubtful that whatever they discuss will be in English.

What other common language do they speak?
Or do you think that there are only two languages in the world: English and "whatever everyone else speaks"?

They are both foreigners who can barely speak English.

Melania speaks English more than well enough to chat and I'm sure that a woman who graduated from Yale is fluent in English. Most foreigners do speak some English, in addition to another language or two, btw.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we actually know if she’s Brahmin

Why does this matter to you? Why are Democrats so obsessed with race and ethnicity?

Democrats aren't. Maybe you assume too much about anonymous posters. It's right wingers like Nick Fuentes who are obsessed with her race.

Nick Fuentes has to be a troll. He's just outrageous.

He's also of Mexican background