The Twitter Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Basically, Taibbi is FoS and has been called out for it. The whole premise of "the twitter files" was false and fake. Just as bad as Fox and Dominion. Lies, lies lies, it is all the GOP has anymore.

Nope, sorry.

The Twitter files is a damning example of government squelching free speech.

Yes, the Trump administration was attempting to squelch free speech.

You haven't been paying attention.
Or, you are gaslighting.
Typical.

[jsteele]

LOL! Taibbi has stopped using Twitter himself because he can't link to his own articles:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Basically, Taibbi is FoS and has been called out for it. The whole premise of "the twitter files" was false and fake. Just as bad as Fox and Dominion. Lies, lies lies, it is all the GOP has anymore.

Nope, sorry.

The Twitter files is a damning example of government squelching free speech.

Yes, the Trump administration was attempting to squelch free speech.

You haven't been paying attention.
Or, you are gaslighting.
Typical.

The Trump administration asked Twitter to take down Chrissy Teigen’s tweet calling Trump a pu**y a** b!|ch. Perhaps it is you who is not paying attention?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:LOL! Taibbi has stopped using Twitter himself because he can't link to his own articles:

The defender of free speech wouldn't criticize Elon for helping Modi engage in censorship, but the second it affected his own pocketbook he's gone. Tells you all you need to know about Taibbi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thread worth reading, but here's the key tweet:

When “Democrats” start quoting a Bush/Cheney stooge, and an architect of the Iraq war, to support their position they cease to become Democrats anymore. Sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not seeing weaponization with the IRS. If he’s been the victim of identity theft, they should reach out. If anything he’s privileged. None of the posters here would be able to get a human on the phone.

Who said he was the victim of identity theft?
Why the personal visit? Not a phone call. Not a letter. A personal UNANNOUNCED visit.
And, you naively think that the IRS is not weaponized. LOL.

Something like that would be pretty easy to fake. I'll believe it when I hear it from a more credible source than Taibbi.

You just cannot admit that our government has been weaponized under Biden.
It is ironic that you consider Taibbi not credible. He is an award winning liberal journalist. Maybe it is because he happens to be highly ethical that you are bothered by him.

Taibbi won all sorts of awards exposing the financial crisis and was one of the most trenchant critics of the Iraq War. He has more liberal bonafides than everyone in this thread, but these people don’t like him because he isn’t a spineless partisan sycophant. We’re in DC, where having a moral and ethical compass that doesn’t bend with the whims of what either party’s leadership dictates is scene as a negative, so I’m not surprised these people hate Taibbi.

People lost faith in Taibbi years ago. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/what-happened-to-matt-taibbi.html

Do you have reading comprehension issues? Serious question. Per the article, Taibbi formed a podcast with a socialist, Katie Halper, and is a mutual admirer of one of the foremost Black socialist intellectuals in the country, Adolf Reed of UPenn. In what world, other than the bizarro world DC echo chamber where neoconservatives make up the back bone of the Democrat party friendly media on MSNBC (Joe Scarborough and Nicole Wallace to name a few), does this make someone a Republican?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not seeing weaponization with the IRS. If he’s been the victim of identity theft, they should reach out. If anything he’s privileged. None of the posters here would be able to get a human on the phone.

Who said he was the victim of identity theft?
Why the personal visit? Not a phone call. Not a letter. A personal UNANNOUNCED visit.
And, you naively think that the IRS is not weaponized. LOL.

Something like that would be pretty easy to fake. I'll believe it when I hear it from a more credible source than Taibbi.

You just cannot admit that our government has been weaponized under Biden.
It is ironic that you consider Taibbi not credible. He is an award winning liberal journalist. Maybe it is because he happens to be highly ethical that you are bothered by him.

Taibbi won all sorts of awards exposing the financial crisis and was one of the most trenchant critics of the Iraq War. He has more liberal bonafides than everyone in this thread, but these people don’t like him because he isn’t a spineless partisan sycophant. We’re in DC, where having a moral and ethical compass that doesn’t bend with the whims of what either party’s leadership dictates is scene as a negative, so I’m not surprised these people hate Taibbi.

People lost faith in Taibbi years ago. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/what-happened-to-matt-taibbi.html

Do you have reading comprehension issues? Serious question. Per the article, Taibbi formed a podcast with a socialist, Katie Halper, and is a mutual admirer of one of the foremost Black socialist intellectuals in the country, Adolf Reed of UPenn. In what world, other than the bizarro world DC echo chamber where neoconservatives make up the back bone of the Democrat party friendly media on MSNBC (Joe Scarborough and Nicole Wallace to name a few), does this make someone a Republican?

Who cares if he's a Democrat or Republican? I sure don't. It's just clear he's a liar. There are plenty of liberals who are liars and I don't have any faith in them either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not seeing weaponization with the IRS. If he’s been the victim of identity theft, they should reach out. If anything he’s privileged. None of the posters here would be able to get a human on the phone.

Who said he was the victim of identity theft?
Why the personal visit? Not a phone call. Not a letter. A personal UNANNOUNCED visit.
And, you naively think that the IRS is not weaponized. LOL.

Something like that would be pretty easy to fake. I'll believe it when I hear it from a more credible source than Taibbi.

You just cannot admit that our government has been weaponized under Biden.
It is ironic that you consider Taibbi not credible. He is an award winning liberal journalist. Maybe it is because he happens to be highly ethical that you are bothered by him.

Taibbi won all sorts of awards exposing the financial crisis and was one of the most trenchant critics of the Iraq War. He has more liberal bonafides than everyone in this thread, but these people don’t like him because he isn’t a spineless partisan sycophant. We’re in DC, where having a moral and ethical compass that doesn’t bend with the whims of what either party’s leadership dictates is scene as a negative, so I’m not surprised these people hate Taibbi.

People lost faith in Taibbi years ago. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/what-happened-to-matt-taibbi.html

Do you have reading comprehension issues? Serious question. Per the article, Taibbi formed a podcast with a socialist, Katie Halper, and is a mutual admirer of one of the foremost Black socialist intellectuals in the country, Adolf Reed of UPenn. In what world, other than the bizarro world DC echo chamber where neoconservatives make up the back bone of the Democrat party friendly media on MSNBC (Joe Scarborough and Nicole Wallace to name a few), does this make someone a Republican?

Who cares if he's a Democrat or Republican? I sure don't. It's just clear he's a liar. There are plenty of liberals who are liars and I don't have any faith in them either.

Because he made a factual mistake in an article? If you cast aside every journalist who made a mistake in an article you wouldn’t have anyone to read. Taibbi is clearly being marked out because he isn’t towing the party line on this story. He’s an independent voice, not a party stooge, so he must be stopped. Just like MSNBC tried to slander and kneecap Bernie in 2016 and 2020.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not seeing weaponization with the IRS. If he’s been the victim of identity theft, they should reach out. If anything he’s privileged. None of the posters here would be able to get a human on the phone.

Who said he was the victim of identity theft?
Why the personal visit? Not a phone call. Not a letter. A personal UNANNOUNCED visit.
And, you naively think that the IRS is not weaponized. LOL.

Something like that would be pretty easy to fake. I'll believe it when I hear it from a more credible source than Taibbi.

You just cannot admit that our government has been weaponized under Biden.
It is ironic that you consider Taibbi not credible. He is an award winning liberal journalist. Maybe it is because he happens to be highly ethical that you are bothered by him.

Taibbi won all sorts of awards exposing the financial crisis and was one of the most trenchant critics of the Iraq War. He has more liberal bonafides than everyone in this thread, but these people don’t like him because he isn’t a spineless partisan sycophant. We’re in DC, where having a moral and ethical compass that doesn’t bend with the whims of what either party’s leadership dictates is scene as a negative, so I’m not surprised these people hate Taibbi.

People lost faith in Taibbi years ago. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/what-happened-to-matt-taibbi.html

Do you have reading comprehension issues? Serious question. Per the article, Taibbi formed a podcast with a socialist, Katie Halper, and is a mutual admirer of one of the foremost Black socialist intellectuals in the country, Adolf Reed of UPenn. In what world, other than the bizarro world DC echo chamber where neoconservatives make up the back bone of the Democrat party friendly media on MSNBC (Joe Scarborough and Nicole Wallace to name a few), does this make someone a Republican?

Who cares if he's a Democrat or Republican? I sure don't. It's just clear he's a liar. There are plenty of liberals who are liars and I don't have any faith in them either.

Because he made a factual mistake in an article? If you cast aside every journalist who made a mistake in an article you wouldn’t have anyone to read. Taibbi is clearly being marked out because he isn’t towing the party line on this story. He’s an independent voice, not a party stooge, so he must be stopped. Just like MSNBC tried to slander and kneecap Bernie in 2016 and 2020.

He's done far more than make a factual mistake. He's spun up a entire false narrative based on these "Twitter files." But no one needs to stop him; he just stopped himself because he got in a fight with his paymaster Elon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not seeing weaponization with the IRS. If he’s been the victim of identity theft, they should reach out. If anything he’s privileged. None of the posters here would be able to get a human on the phone.

Who said he was the victim of identity theft?
Why the personal visit? Not a phone call. Not a letter. A personal UNANNOUNCED visit.
And, you naively think that the IRS is not weaponized. LOL.

Something like that would be pretty easy to fake. I'll believe it when I hear it from a more credible source than Taibbi.

You just cannot admit that our government has been weaponized under Biden.
It is ironic that you consider Taibbi not credible. He is an award winning liberal journalist. Maybe it is because he happens to be highly ethical that you are bothered by him.

Taibbi won all sorts of awards exposing the financial crisis and was one of the most trenchant critics of the Iraq War. He has more liberal bonafides than everyone in this thread, but these people don’t like him because he isn’t a spineless partisan sycophant. We’re in DC, where having a moral and ethical compass that doesn’t bend with the whims of what either party’s leadership dictates is scene as a negative, so I’m not surprised these people hate Taibbi.

People lost faith in Taibbi years ago. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/what-happened-to-matt-taibbi.html

Do you have reading comprehension issues? Serious question. Per the article, Taibbi formed a podcast with a socialist, Katie Halper, and is a mutual admirer of one of the foremost Black socialist intellectuals in the country, Adolf Reed of UPenn. In what world, other than the bizarro world DC echo chamber where neoconservatives make up the back bone of the Democrat party friendly media on MSNBC (Joe Scarborough and Nicole Wallace to name a few), does this make someone a Republican?

Who cares if he's a Democrat or Republican? I sure don't. It's just clear he's a liar. There are plenty of liberals who are liars and I don't have any faith in them either.

Because he made a factual mistake in an article? If you cast aside every journalist who made a mistake in an article you wouldn’t have anyone to read. Taibbi is clearly being marked out because he isn’t towing the party line on this story. He’s an independent voice, not a party stooge, so he must be stopped. Just like MSNBC tried to slander and kneecap Bernie in 2016 and 2020.

He's done far more than make a factual mistake. He's spun up a entire false narrative based on these "Twitter files." But no one needs to stop him; he just stopped himself because he got in a fight with his paymaster Elon.

+1 He also lied under oath about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not seeing weaponization with the IRS. If he’s been the victim of identity theft, they should reach out. If anything he’s privileged. None of the posters here would be able to get a human on the phone.

Who said he was the victim of identity theft?
Why the personal visit? Not a phone call. Not a letter. A personal UNANNOUNCED visit.
And, you naively think that the IRS is not weaponized. LOL.

Something like that would be pretty easy to fake. I'll believe it when I hear it from a more credible source than Taibbi.

You just cannot admit that our government has been weaponized under Biden.
It is ironic that you consider Taibbi not credible. He is an award winning liberal journalist. Maybe it is because he happens to be highly ethical that you are bothered by him.

Taibbi won all sorts of awards exposing the financial crisis and was one of the most trenchant critics of the Iraq War. He has more liberal bonafides than everyone in this thread, but these people don’t like him because he isn’t a spineless partisan sycophant. We’re in DC, where having a moral and ethical compass that doesn’t bend with the whims of what either party’s leadership dictates is scene as a negative, so I’m not surprised these people hate Taibbi.

People lost faith in Taibbi years ago. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/what-happened-to-matt-taibbi.html

Do you have reading comprehension issues? Serious question. Per the article, Taibbi formed a podcast with a socialist, Katie Halper, and is a mutual admirer of one of the foremost Black socialist intellectuals in the country, Adolf Reed of UPenn. In what world, other than the bizarro world DC echo chamber where neoconservatives make up the back bone of the Democrat party friendly media on MSNBC (Joe Scarborough and Nicole Wallace to name a few), does this make someone a Republican?

Who cares if he's a Democrat or Republican? I sure don't. It's just clear he's a liar. There are plenty of liberals who are liars and I don't have any faith in them either.

Because he made a factual mistake in an article? If you cast aside every journalist who made a mistake in an article you wouldn’t have anyone to read. Taibbi is clearly being marked out because he isn’t towing the party line on this story. He’s an independent voice, not a party stooge, so he must be stopped. Just like MSNBC tried to slander and kneecap Bernie in 2016 and 2020.

He's done far more than make a factual mistake. He's spun up a entire false narrative based on these "Twitter files." But no one needs to stop him; he just stopped himself because he got in a fight with his paymaster Elon.

+1 He also lied under oath about it.

Wow, just wow. How could this guy go on this long, through multiple articles and then congressional testimony, basing his thesis on the assumption that CISA and CIS are the same thing? It's just so sloppy that it's hard to believe it's not intentional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not seeing weaponization with the IRS. If he’s been the victim of identity theft, they should reach out. If anything he’s privileged. None of the posters here would be able to get a human on the phone.

Who said he was the victim of identity theft?
Why the personal visit? Not a phone call. Not a letter. A personal UNANNOUNCED visit.
And, you naively think that the IRS is not weaponized. LOL.

Something like that would be pretty easy to fake. I'll believe it when I hear it from a more credible source than Taibbi.

You just cannot admit that our government has been weaponized under Biden.
It is ironic that you consider Taibbi not credible. He is an award winning liberal journalist. Maybe it is because he happens to be highly ethical that you are bothered by him.

Taibbi won all sorts of awards exposing the financial crisis and was one of the most trenchant critics of the Iraq War. He has more liberal bonafides than everyone in this thread, but these people don’t like him because he isn’t a spineless partisan sycophant. We’re in DC, where having a moral and ethical compass that doesn’t bend with the whims of what either party’s leadership dictates is scene as a negative, so I’m not surprised these people hate Taibbi.

People lost faith in Taibbi years ago. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/what-happened-to-matt-taibbi.html

Do you have reading comprehension issues? Serious question. Per the article, Taibbi formed a podcast with a socialist, Katie Halper, and is a mutual admirer of one of the foremost Black socialist intellectuals in the country, Adolf Reed of UPenn. In what world, other than the bizarro world DC echo chamber where neoconservatives make up the back bone of the Democrat party friendly media on MSNBC (Joe Scarborough and Nicole Wallace to name a few), does this make someone a Republican?

Who cares if he's a Democrat or Republican? I sure don't. It's just clear he's a liar. There are plenty of liberals who are liars and I don't have any faith in them either.

Because he made a factual mistake in an article? If you cast aside every journalist who made a mistake in an article you wouldn’t have anyone to read. Taibbi is clearly being marked out because he isn’t towing the party line on this story. He’s an independent voice, not a party stooge, so he must be stopped. Just like MSNBC tried to slander and kneecap Bernie in 2016 and 2020.

He's done far more than make a factual mistake. He's spun up a entire false narrative based on these "Twitter files." But no one needs to stop him; he just stopped himself because he got in a fight with his paymaster Elon.

+1 He also lied under oath about it.

Wow, just wow. How could this guy go on this long, through multiple articles and then congressional testimony, basing his thesis on the assumption that CISA and CIS are the same thing? It's just so sloppy that it's hard to believe it's not intentional.

This is what happens when people don’t think they need editors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not seeing weaponization with the IRS. If he’s been the victim of identity theft, they should reach out. If anything he’s privileged. None of the posters here would be able to get a human on the phone.

Who said he was the victim of identity theft?
Why the personal visit? Not a phone call. Not a letter. A personal UNANNOUNCED visit.
And, you naively think that the IRS is not weaponized. LOL.

Something like that would be pretty easy to fake. I'll believe it when I hear it from a more credible source than Taibbi.

You just cannot admit that our government has been weaponized under Biden.
It is ironic that you consider Taibbi not credible. He is an award winning liberal journalist. Maybe it is because he happens to be highly ethical that you are bothered by him.

Taibbi won all sorts of awards exposing the financial crisis and was one of the most trenchant critics of the Iraq War. He has more liberal bonafides than everyone in this thread, but these people don’t like him because he isn’t a spineless partisan sycophant. We’re in DC, where having a moral and ethical compass that doesn’t bend with the whims of what either party’s leadership dictates is scene as a negative, so I’m not surprised these people hate Taibbi.

People lost faith in Taibbi years ago. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/what-happened-to-matt-taibbi.html

Do you have reading comprehension issues? Serious question. Per the article, Taibbi formed a podcast with a socialist, Katie Halper, and is a mutual admirer of one of the foremost Black socialist intellectuals in the country, Adolf Reed of UPenn. In what world, other than the bizarro world DC echo chamber where neoconservatives make up the back bone of the Democrat party friendly media on MSNBC (Joe Scarborough and Nicole Wallace to name a few), does this make someone a Republican?

Who cares if he's a Democrat or Republican? I sure don't. It's just clear he's a liar. There are plenty of liberals who are liars and I don't have any faith in them either.

Because he made a factual mistake in an article? If you cast aside every journalist who made a mistake in an article you wouldn’t have anyone to read. Taibbi is clearly being marked out because he isn’t towing the party line on this story. He’s an independent voice, not a party stooge, so he must be stopped. Just like MSNBC tried to slander and kneecap Bernie in 2016 and 2020.

+1000
And, he has since corrected it.
Which is more than I can say for some of the "preferred" media of the left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not seeing weaponization with the IRS. If he’s been the victim of identity theft, they should reach out. If anything he’s privileged. None of the posters here would be able to get a human on the phone.

Who said he was the victim of identity theft?
Why the personal visit? Not a phone call. Not a letter. A personal UNANNOUNCED visit.
And, you naively think that the IRS is not weaponized. LOL.

Something like that would be pretty easy to fake. I'll believe it when I hear it from a more credible source than Taibbi.

You just cannot admit that our government has been weaponized under Biden.
It is ironic that you consider Taibbi not credible. He is an award winning liberal journalist. Maybe it is because he happens to be highly ethical that you are bothered by him.

Taibbi won all sorts of awards exposing the financial crisis and was one of the most trenchant critics of the Iraq War. He has more liberal bonafides than everyone in this thread, but these people don’t like him because he isn’t a spineless partisan sycophant. We’re in DC, where having a moral and ethical compass that doesn’t bend with the whims of what either party’s leadership dictates is scene as a negative, so I’m not surprised these people hate Taibbi.

People lost faith in Taibbi years ago. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/what-happened-to-matt-taibbi.html

Do you have reading comprehension issues? Serious question. Per the article, Taibbi formed a podcast with a socialist, Katie Halper, and is a mutual admirer of one of the foremost Black socialist intellectuals in the country, Adolf Reed of UPenn. In what world, other than the bizarro world DC echo chamber where neoconservatives make up the back bone of the Democrat party friendly media on MSNBC (Joe Scarborough and Nicole Wallace to name a few), does this make someone a Republican?

Who cares if he's a Democrat or Republican? I sure don't. It's just clear he's a liar. There are plenty of liberals who are liars and I don't have any faith in them either.

Because he made a factual mistake in an article? If you cast aside every journalist who made a mistake in an article you wouldn’t have anyone to read. Taibbi is clearly being marked out because he isn’t towing the party line on this story. He’s an independent voice, not a party stooge, so he must be stopped. Just like MSNBC tried to slander and kneecap Bernie in 2016 and 2020.

+1000
And, he has since corrected it.
Which is more than I can say for some of the "preferred" media of the left.

He fixed one error, but not the many others. In fact, he doubled down on them. And even for the one he fixed, he tries to minimize it. The error was not "one tweet." It was key to his thesis and he repeated it in congressional testimony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not seeing weaponization with the IRS. If he’s been the victim of identity theft, they should reach out. If anything he’s privileged. None of the posters here would be able to get a human on the phone.

Who said he was the victim of identity theft?
Why the personal visit? Not a phone call. Not a letter. A personal UNANNOUNCED visit.
And, you naively think that the IRS is not weaponized. LOL.

Something like that would be pretty easy to fake. I'll believe it when I hear it from a more credible source than Taibbi.

You just cannot admit that our government has been weaponized under Biden.
It is ironic that you consider Taibbi not credible. He is an award winning liberal journalist. Maybe it is because he happens to be highly ethical that you are bothered by him.

Taibbi won all sorts of awards exposing the financial crisis and was one of the most trenchant critics of the Iraq War. He has more liberal bonafides than everyone in this thread, but these people don’t like him because he isn’t a spineless partisan sycophant. We’re in DC, where having a moral and ethical compass that doesn’t bend with the whims of what either party’s leadership dictates is scene as a negative, so I’m not surprised these people hate Taibbi.

People lost faith in Taibbi years ago. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/what-happened-to-matt-taibbi.html

Do you have reading comprehension issues? Serious question. Per the article, Taibbi formed a podcast with a socialist, Katie Halper, and is a mutual admirer of one of the foremost Black socialist intellectuals in the country, Adolf Reed of UPenn. In what world, other than the bizarro world DC echo chamber where neoconservatives make up the back bone of the Democrat party friendly media on MSNBC (Joe Scarborough and Nicole Wallace to name a few), does this make someone a Republican?

Who cares if he's a Democrat or Republican? I sure don't. It's just clear he's a liar. There are plenty of liberals who are liars and I don't have any faith in them either.

Because he made a factual mistake in an article? If you cast aside every journalist who made a mistake in an article you wouldn’t have anyone to read. Taibbi is clearly being marked out because he isn’t towing the party line on this story. He’s an independent voice, not a party stooge, so he must be stopped. Just like MSNBC tried to slander and kneecap Bernie in 2016 and 2020.

+1000
And, he has since corrected it.
Which is more than I can say for some of the "preferred" media of the left.

He fixed one error, but not the many others. In fact, he doubled down on them. And even for the one he fixed, he tries to minimize it. The error was not "one tweet." It was key to his thesis and he repeated it in congressional testimony.

Would that you held MSM to this same standard. Maybe then we wouldn't need rogue independents to get the real juicy stuff.