|
In other words, typical leftist semantics to call someone a liar. Glad he’s correcting, but given the EIP did change their model after the disinformation board was dropped, his points still stand. This was his tweet in March: 28. EIP research manager Renee DiResta boasted that while filling “gaps," the EIP succeeded in getting “tech partners” Google, TikTok, Facebook and Twitter to take action on “35% of the URLS flagged” under “remove, reduce, or inform” policies. So he even said it then as well. |
|
|
| Basically, Taibbi is FoS and has been called out for it. The whole premise of "the twitter files" was false and fake. Just as bad as Fox and Dominion. Lies, lies lies, it is all the GOP has anymore. |
This is the danger of Substack journalism. The tactic here is to find minor issues to invalidate the whole projects. Stubstack journalists don't have legit editors or institutional reputation to fall back on. |
Nope, sorry. The Twitter files is a damning example of government squelching free speech. |
Only in your deluded mind, Boris. |
And you probably believe Hillary Clinton killed Vince Foster too, right? |
Yes, the Trump administration was attempting to squelch free speech. |
Not directly. Depends on what the meaning of is is. What difference does it make. |